Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LongTomH

(8,636 posts)
Sat Sep 3, 2016, 01:39 PM Sep 2016

More on that Oklahoma quake:

NPR Reports: Earthquake Rattles Oklahoma; One of Strongest Reported in State:

The epicenter was around 8 miles northwest of Pawnee, a town of less than 3,000 people. Shortly after the large quake hit, at least four additional temblors struck the same area, with the strongest having a magnitude of 3.6; all of them were shallower than the first quake.

According to the National Weather Service's Tulsa office, the earthquake ties the strongest quake in Oklahoma history at 5.6 magnitude. The previous record breaker hit on Nov. 5, 2011, the agency says.

The NPR article included this quote from the US Geological Survey:

"Locations across the central and eastern United States (CEUS) have been experiencing a rapid increase in the number of induced earthquakes over the past 7 years. Since 2009 rates in some areas, such as Oklahoma, have increased by more than an order of magnitude. Scientific studies have linked the majority of this increased activity to wastewater injection in deep disposal wells in several locations. However, other mechanisms such as fluid withdrawal, enhanced oil recovery, or hydraulic fracturing processes can also result in induced earthquakes."


The USGS site included these maps:







I would add: we felt it up here in KC. KMBC 9 posted this seismographic map:

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
More on that Oklahoma quake: (Original Post) LongTomH Sep 2016 OP
Last year I saw an overlay of the fracking waste water injection sites ChairmanAgnostic Sep 2016 #1
K&R saidsimplesimon Sep 2016 #2
??? Many land owners DURHAM D Sep 2016 #3
OK, I stand corrected. saidsimplesimon Sep 2016 #4
In oil country a lot do not own their mineral rights...a lot pipoman Sep 2016 #5
Land developers all of over the U.S. are also elehhhhna Sep 2016 #6
It depends on what part of the country you are talking about. DURHAM D Sep 2016 #7

ChairmanAgnostic

(28,017 posts)
1. Last year I saw an overlay of the fracking waste water injection sites
Sat Sep 3, 2016, 01:45 PM
Sep 2016

And the incidence of tremors. It was a shocker.

saidsimplesimon

(7,888 posts)
2. K&R
Sat Sep 3, 2016, 01:50 PM
Sep 2016

Land owners do not own the rights to the oil on their land. They've sold those rights to the greedy, oil frackers. It takes a quake near a bushit estate for any bans to be issued. If you live near Dallas, you know what I mean.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
5. In oil country a lot do not own their mineral rights...a lot
Sat Sep 3, 2016, 02:19 PM
Sep 2016

It isn't at all uncommon for ground with rights intact to be sold separately at land auctions here. Most land with mineral rights intact are leased to producers..

 

elehhhhna

(32,076 posts)
6. Land developers all of over the U.S. are also
Sat Sep 3, 2016, 02:43 PM
Sep 2016

Keeping the mineral rights to developed properties now.
Like entire subdivisions.

DURHAM D

(32,610 posts)
7. It depends on what part of the country you are talking about.
Sat Sep 3, 2016, 03:55 PM
Sep 2016

In some states the farmers and ranchers have mostly retained mineral rights. Also, they are pretty smart about conditions in the leases.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»More on that Oklahoma qua...