Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums“Asymmetric Politics”: A deep dive into the mysterious puzzle of America’s political divide
Asymmetric Politics: A deep dive into the mysterious puzzle of Americas political divideby Paul Rosenberg at Salon
http://www.salon.com/2016/08/30/asymmetric-politics-a-deep-dive-into-the-mysterious-puzzle-of-americas-political-divide/
SNIP............
The Democratic Party fosters a relatively pragmatic, results-oriented style of politics in which officeholders are rewarded for delivering concrete benefits to targeted groups in order to address specific social problems, the authors wrote. In contrast, the Republicans are more prone to forge partisan ties based on common ideological beliefs, encouraging party officials to pursue broad rightward shifts in public policy.
Thus, the authors concluded: Republican voters and activists are more likely than their Democratic counterparts to prize symbolic demonstrations of ideological purity and to pressure their party leaders to reject moderation and compromise.
.............
As Gingrich discovered in his showdown with Clinton, the publics preference for limited federal power in the abstract often dissipates when voters are confronted with potential cuts to particular services, the authors wrote. At the same time, they noted that the Democrats can be surprised by the same pattern in reverse: Clintons once-popular goal of implementing universal health insurance failed after Republicans in Congress successfully characterized it as a left-wing scheme to impose government control over the health care system and reduce the freedom of private citizens.
Both parties would be wise to learn from the authors about the potential for political paralysis that results from their performance in carrying out actions in keeping with their general tendencies. The Democrats finally managed to have Obamacare passed, only to see Republicans sweep to power in the House by running against it and then plunging the government into prolonged gridlock. Republicans found themselves incapable of proposing anything concrete to replace Obamacare with, despite scores of votes to repeal it, and the frustration that was generated as a result disenchanted many GOP voters, opening the way for Trumps rise.
............SNIP
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 485 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
“Asymmetric Politics”: A deep dive into the mysterious puzzle of America’s political divide (Original Post)
applegrove
Aug 2016
OP
PSPS
(13,614 posts)1. "Republicans sweep to power in the House by running against (Obamacare)"
The Democrats finally managed to have Obamacare passed, only to see Republicans sweep to power in the House by running against it and then plunging the government into prolonged gridlock.
Very poor journalism and memory. Republicans took the house solely due to racial gerrymandering. The "prolonged gridlock" was mostly racial in nature. Republicans were "punishing the country" for electing a democrat (and, even worse to them, a 'negro') as president.