Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
Wed Aug 3, 2016, 10:09 AM Aug 2016

Judge finds ‘revenge porn’ law unconstitutional

On an October day last year, a Bennington County woman got a call telling her that naked photographs of her had been posted on Facebook.

The woman had seen the photos before. In fact, she had taken them and shared them via private message with a man. Now, without her consent, they were posted publicly and she was tagged in them.

The incident became one of the first cases to be brought in criminal court under Vermont’s newly enacted law on what’s known as revenge porn. However, earlier this month, a judge dismissed the case because he found the law unconstitutional on free-speech grounds.

Now, just over one year after the bill was signed into law, the statute appears poised to be tested before the Vermont Supreme Court.

Read more: http://vtdigger.org/2016/08/01/judge-finds-revenge-porn-law-unconstitutional/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge finds ‘revenge porn’ law unconstitutional (Original Post) NaturalHigh Aug 2016 OP
I know the ACLU anoNY42 Aug 2016 #1
I wondered the same thing. NaturalHigh Aug 2016 #2
 

anoNY42

(670 posts)
1. I know the ACLU
Wed Aug 3, 2016, 10:11 AM
Aug 2016

opposed a similar law in Arizona because they thought it would criminalize certain books and magazines (the law there was written very broadly). I wonder if something similar is happening in VT?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge finds ‘revenge porn...