Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

erpowers

(9,350 posts)
Tue Aug 2, 2016, 09:45 AM Aug 2016

Should We Really Be Surprised About Theranos?

Last edited Tue Aug 2, 2016, 10:34 AM - Edit history (1)

I am not some college elitist, but Elizabeth Holmes was a 19 year old college drop-out who knew nothing about Chemistry or science. The college drop-out part is not the problem for me; the knew nothing about Chemistry or science part is the problem for me. Why would anyone believe a person who has no science training, when they claim their company will revolutionize science?

I think some people are getting a little too eager for college drop-out stories. Yes, Mark Zuckerberg dropped out of college, but he knew coding and how the website he was promoting worked. Yes, Steve Jobs dropped out of college, but he understood how to build a computer. Yes, Bill Gates dropped out of college, but as far as I know he understood how to work with computers. Elizabeth Holmes was not the equivalent of the previously listed men. She was attempting to create a company that dealt with a subject on which she did not have a firm grasp.

From the very beginning more people should have asked about her qualifications to run this company. How could a 19 year old with little to no knowledge of the science behind the test she was trying to change actually improve the test? If anyone in the media had asked even a few questions they would have realized Theranos was, at best, mainly smoke and mirrors, at worst, a scam.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Should We Really Be Surprised About Theranos? (Original Post) erpowers Aug 2016 OP
Maybe because anyone with a compelling narrative can always capture Nay Aug 2016 #1
I looked into Theranos some time back TexasProgresive Aug 2016 #2
Give her time. She'll one day be the female Donald Trump mainer Aug 2016 #3

Nay

(12,051 posts)
1. Maybe because anyone with a compelling narrative can always capture
Tue Aug 2, 2016, 10:09 AM
Aug 2016

attention way better than anyone talking sense about science?

As far as I can tell, the "story" you can tell has always had more power than actual truth told plainly as long as the story is told in a compelling way, with all the "heroes' journey" story elements present (dropout makes huge discovery! Wins fight against Big Chem! Builds a company from nothing! Saves the world! Etc., etc.). This is the oldest story arc in the world and fits right in with the American up-from-your-bootstraps narrative, also called the Horatio Alger rags-to-riches.

TexasProgresive

(12,159 posts)
2. I looked into Theranos some time back
Tue Aug 2, 2016, 10:09 AM
Aug 2016

It looked like a scam to me then and still does- I don't know anything about Elizabeth Holmes.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should We Really Be Surpr...