General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBlack Lives Matter Releases Policy Agenda
Please tell me this came from the Onion or some RW rag...
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/black-lives-matter-releases-policy-agenda-n620966
The six platform demands are:
1. End the war on black people.
2. Reparations for past and continuing harms.
3. Divestment from the institutions that criminalize, cage and harm black people; and investment in the education, health and safety of black people.
4. Economic justice for all and a reconstruction of the economy to ensure our communities have collective ownership, not merely access.
5. Community control of the laws, institutions and policies that most impact us.
6. Independent black political power and black self-determination in all areas of society.
To achieve those demands the group offered a set of solutions that include the demilitarization of police and an end to systemic attacks on black youth, including black members of the LGBTQ community. They call for the passing of state and federal laws that acknowledge and address the impacts of slavery and the passage of H.R. 40 to form a commission to study reparations proposals. Another of the recommendations calls for the "retroactive decriminalization and immediate release of all people convicted of drug offenses, sex work-related offenses and youth offenses."
Words... fail me. If it hasn't happened already, this will turn BLM into a laughingstock.
Skittles
(153,202 posts)SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)JustinL
(722 posts)I'm not sure exactly what about this you find amusing, and frankly I don't really care. Welcome to my ignore list.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)admit that the war continues?
Capitalism needs racism. The 1% need capitalism.
What do you mean "laughingstock"? Do you disagree with the diagnosis, or the proposed solutions.
Uponthegears
(1,499 posts)Which of these proposals tickle your funny bone?
Was it the suggestion that a war is being waged on black people?
Even setting aside the fact that the 4th Circuit just found that the State of North Carolina was waging war on black people, one would think the pile of dead unarmed black bodies stacking up at the business end of cop guns would be nothing to laugh at.
I also see little humor in the fact that 60 trillion dollars of slave-created wealth is being held by the beneficiaries of the plantation culture.
I'm also not laughing at the use of educational institutions as a tool of early criminalization.
I'm just wondering what is so funny.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)That seems a little ridiculous.
Uponthegears
(1,499 posts)it might seem that way, but the decriminalization of drugs is a near-mainstream idea.
If, indeed, that idea is near-mainstream, I can't think of a reason why any drug offender (assuming they were not also convicted of a violent crime) should not be immediately released.
Given that, BLM's strong interest in preventing the subjugation, imprisonment, disenfranchisement, and execution (both judicial and non-judicial), and the disparate impact of drug convictions on the black community, I can't say this isn't a reasonable policy position.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)But not with respect to other drugs.
Can you show me a poll that suggests otherwise?
Uponthegears
(1,499 posts)And, yes, I laugh at Libertarians so maybe that isn't the best example.
But,
I would be hard-pressed to say that, when their presidential candidate has 10% support according to 538, the fact that someone with my insufferable ego laughs at them actually makes them laughable.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)It is true that we have come a long way in the last decade or so in terms of the perception of marijuana.
Maybe things will change with respect to other drugs as well.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Politically, the retroactive aspect is shaky, but release of non-violent drug offenders seems reasonable.
Warpy
(111,359 posts)It's not a well thought out list.
An earlier one was much better.
uponit7771
(90,364 posts)Warpy
(111,359 posts)This is the real deal: https://policy.m4bl.org/economic-justice/
While I do have quibbles with it here and there, they are extremely minor ones.
However, the list in the OP just doesn't mesh with the well developed and articulate things I've read elsewhere.
kcr
(15,320 posts)This is the problem with those who think you need to be reasonable. You don't start from the middle and sound reasonable. If you do, you won't get anything.
Warpy
(111,359 posts)it also means it is unworkable and you wouldn't like it if you got it. Fighting for such things just discredits you.
kcr
(15,320 posts)and there's a reason you're not with them.
uponit7771
(90,364 posts)gg4usa
(83 posts)Seems like a fairly reasonable list, although this: "retroactive decriminalization and immediate release of all people convicted of drug offenses, sex work-related offenses and youth offenses" seems to be too extreme - not sure I can agree with decriminalizing sexual harassment and some drug offenses, and not sure what they mean by youth offenses.
Uponthegears
(1,499 posts)last point is about ending the criminalization of sex workers.
I am almost positive the youth offenses refers to the way people of color are ushered into the criminal justice system beginning with the dramatically harsher treatment black children receive in terms of school discipline coupled with the increasing criminalization of school misbehavior which puts black children into the criminal justice system at an early age. This, in turn, saddles them with more extensive criminal records which are in turn used to justify harsher sentences. In turn, these more extensive criminal records are then paraded out as the "reason" that PoC are overepresented in the criminal justice system . . . as opposed to, say, the fact that the system is intrinsically racist.
gg4usa
(83 posts)Heaven forbid that we should actually point out that police/the system is racially bias. Seems some police officers choose their profession just so they can beat some black A_ _.
Iggo
(47,571 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)What did people expect, requests for micro loans and small business tax breaks?
glennward
(989 posts)state, local, and national, responsible or vote them out next time.
Glassunion
(10,201 posts)kcr
(15,320 posts)I don't get it.
Iggo
(47,571 posts)romanic
(2,841 posts)Reparations will never happen, the time for that has long since passed. Number 6 is very vague; an independent black political party? Number 1 is just pure emotion and could mean anything.
Again, what will BLM do to achieve any of this. The ball is in their court.
Glassunion
(10,201 posts)It does not equal cash payouts.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Archae
(46,354 posts)He had a caricature of radical "students" called "S W I N E."
Students Wildly Indignant about Nearly Everything.
They'd make stupid demands, and even after the demands were met, they'd riot anyway.
It wasn't until they made demands on the Mob, (who had taken over their college,) and got the patooties pounded out of them that they laid off.
Now while this was a silly comic strip, it still sound like this in this BLM "policy agenda."
It's unworkable, unfair, racist, (oh you god damn right it is!) and simply stupid.
It's one thing to demand accountablity of the cops, or banks, Wall Street or the US government.
But reparations?
From who? And for what?
And this "policy agenda" is gold to the right wing.
They want to stop blacks from voting, or moving into *THEIR* neighborhoods, etc.
This radical "agenda" is gold for their propaganda machine.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Because the vast majority have lived in perpetual poverty.
The problem is that it is likely to be thrown out by SCOTUS as we're the vast majority of affirmative action programs.
Archae
(46,354 posts)Who would the money come from?
Who would hand the money out?
Who would actually get the money?
Far too many outdated and vague chances for claims.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)If structured like affirmative action, we could make it available to the poor to the poor and middle class.
Having a permanent underclass based on race while claiming everyone is equal has failed.
Outdated and vague claims is no reason continue perpetual poverty based on race, and deserve as much consideration as claims of voter fraud and welfare queens, which is to say none.
Archae
(46,354 posts)Not anymore.
People are poor for many reasons, but no longer due to race.
If good jobs are being unfairly given to whites, find and expose the bad bosses.
It's not that hard, and investigative reporters used to do it rather often.
Same for bad banks, etc.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)I do not agree with your assumption.
melman
(7,681 posts)All the idiots howling about JPR are totally ignoring this. lol
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,858 posts)How's that supposed to work?
Glassunion
(10,201 posts)It's laid out here: https://policy.m4bl.org/platform/
TipTok
(2,474 posts)... they can still claim to be wronged now and forever.