General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow Abigail Adams Proves Bill O'Reilly Wrong About Slavery
In her widely lauded speech at the Democratic National Convention on Monday, Michelle Obama reflected on the remarkable fact of her African American family living in the executive mansion.
I wake up every morning in a house that was built by slaves. And I watch my daughters, two beautiful, intelligent, black young women, playing with their dogs on the White House lawn, she said.
On Tuesday, Fox News host Bill OReilly discussed the moment in his Tip of the Day. In a moment first noticed by the liberal press-tracking group Media Matters, OReilly said this:
Slaves did participate in the construction of the White House. Records show about 400 payments made to slave masters between 1795 and 1801. In addition, free blacks, whites, and immigrants also worked on the massive building. There were no illegal immigrants at that time. If you could make it here, you could stay here.
In 1800, President John Adams took up residence in what was then called the Executive Mansion. It was only later on they named it the White House. But Adams was in there with Abigail, and they were still hammering nails, the construction was still going on.
Slaves that worked there were well-fed and had decent lodgings provided by the government, which stopped hiring slave labor in 1802. However, the feds did not forbid subcontractors from using slave labor. So, Michelle Obama is essentially correct in citing slaves as builders of the White House, but there were others working as well. Got it all? There will be a quiz.
-snip-
It is not hard to find contemporary accounts from slaves who were neither happy nor contentand whose eloquent testimony accounts to their inspiration, capability, and intellectual powers. If many whites like Hammond were unable to see this, however, others were not so blinkered. As OReilly noted, Michelle Obamas predecessor as first lady, Abigail Adams was living in the White House at the time when slaves were building it, and she recorded her observations of those working on landscaping the grounds.
The effects of Slavery are visible every where; and I have amused myself from day to day in looking at the labour of 12 negroes from my window, who are employd with four small Horse Carts to remove some dirt in front of the house, she wrote. Moreover, Mrs. Adams took note of their conditionand her observation stands at odds with OReillys:
Two of our hardy N England men would do as much work in a day as the whole 12, but it is true Republicanism that drive the Slaves half fed, and destitute of cloathing, ... to labour, whilst the owner waches about Idle, tho his one Slave is all the property he can boast.
Adamss rebuke to OReilly is not the first time that a benign recollection of slavery has broken apart on the shoals of reality.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/how-abigail-adams-proves-bill-oreilly-wrong-about-slavery/ar-BBuXEud?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=edgsp
Enrique
(27,461 posts)how could he have gotten this wrong?
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)It has existed throughout most of human history, and there are still pockets today. But, the concept of actually owning another human being has been thoroughly disgraced in modern times.
Africans were enslaved because a Pope decreed that Irishmen, or any other Europeans, couldn't be slaves any more. The immortal soul that perhaps Africans didn't possess was the explanation. The real explanation was they could get away with it with Africans.
Of course, with all the slaves around, some were treated better than others and some might have acquiesced to a life that wasn't all that bad. But, he entire concept of owning a human being like you own a horse of a pig is in itself the problem.
lapucelle
(18,309 posts)It was abjectly and absolutely heart breaking.
https://memory.loc.gov/ammem/snhtml/snhome.html