General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsChairman of the DNC is the MOST THANKLESS job in the party.
You take shit, you work long hours, you get no credit and take all the blame.
And you don't get paid one red cent for all that shit.
IT takes a lot of guts and party loyalty to even begin to do the job.
Thank you for your service, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz. I am certain the next president of the United States will not forget your loyalty to the party as a whole when the time comes for appointments.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)Chief of Staff? Her career ain't over. It's beyond the realm of reason that she would be in line for that position.
Republican heads will explode - and that's a good thing.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)all they got to do is make up a DWS name plate and she's good to go.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)She's loyal.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)nt
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Sadly. She knew what she was doing.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Thank you for your service!
oxymoron
(4,053 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Cheers
Dawgs
(14,755 posts)Got our asses handed to us twice while she was chair.
Only big win came because Obama was such a great candidate. Had nothing to do with her.
Also, Dean was praised for the work he did. So, not so thankless after all.
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)Not so much.
How many seats did she lose us?
runaway hero
(835 posts)BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)R B Garr
(16,954 posts)That's hilarious!
GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)I would ask for more but I'm laughing too hard as it is
Rex
(65,616 posts)The extreme center is having a breakdown.
randome
(34,845 posts)She could have done things a little better but that can be said about anyone. But the rabid left needed their pound of flesh and she was a convenient target so I'm glad she's leaving the post.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]A 90% chance of rain means the same as a 10% chance:
It might rain and it might not.[/center][/font][hr]
edhopper
(33,587 posts)for pay day loan operators is evil.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]A 90% chance of rain means the same as a 10% chance:
It might rain and it might not.[/center][/font][hr]
but she took the side of the vultures over her constituents for donations.
She acted like a typical Repuke.
edhopper
(33,587 posts)if it was so "thankless", why did she extort Obama into keeping her job?
She is a loan shark shill who shouldn't even be in congress.
Avalon Sparks
(2,566 posts)fishwax
(29,149 posts)DFW
(54,405 posts)The day we get a DNC chairperson who manages THAT is the day we can comfortably look forward to controlling both houses of Congress again. I have no idea at all who that might be. It is further complicated by the fact that when a party has the White House, the President is the Party head, not the national committee chairperson. Howard was so effective because he was DNC Chair in opposition. In other words, the party was in his hands. That's what made his achievements in 2006 and 2008 so noteworthy, but also so possible.
It's also why he resigned in 2009. He had no interest in coming into conflict with Obama, and did the noble thing when Obama's inauguration made him the titular party head. Howard got kicked in the ass for his trouble by Rahm Emmanuel, Obama's first White House Chief of Staff and long-time Dean-hater, and stoically accepted his fate. But WE, the Democratic Party, have never forgotten his achievement. Like Al Gore with the Vice-Presidency, Howard changed the definition of the job of Party Chair forever.
We now expect great things, nearly impossible things, from our party chairperson. Anyone holding that position from 2009 on can either thank or curse Howard Dean for that.
PatSeg
(47,501 posts)It is hard to know before hand how good a person will be at such a job and in Dean's case, it really was a thankless job.
Was there anyone that Rahm Emmanuel didn't rub the wrong way?
former9thward
(32,025 posts)Dean made $105,000 a year back in 2005 when he was Chair.
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/republican-party/a-look-at-the-parties-sept-spe.html
Avalon Sparks
(2,566 posts)Her actions were shameful and the only appropriate response should be reprehension.
Corruption is never a good thing for the masses.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)The only corruption I've seen are people celebrating Russian hackers. That's pretty damned corrupt if you ask me.
Avalon Sparks
(2,566 posts)You know it takes integrity to call out corruption when the corruption benefits YOU.
Over a grand in this year to Senator Sanders campaign and annual contributions of 300-500 to the DNC the last 15 years, and 35 years of only voting for Democrats..... and this is what I got in return? No one pees on my leg and tells me it's raining.
I know corruption when I see it.... It doesn't take a genius to know when you're getting screwed over....
The fact that members of a forum that identifies as Democratic are looking the other way and even supporting this travesty is beyond my comprehension.
You don't have to condemn it, or even speak out against her actions....
But to support it? To thank this bitch? Really? Fucking really?
DinahMoeHum
(21,794 posts). . .although a former legislator would be OK.
DWS was essentially serving two masters: the Democratic Party apparatus and her own constituency. If you try to do both at the same time, you won't do either one well.
edhopper
(33,587 posts)pay-day loan sharks who prey on her constituency.
Response to MohRokTah (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)edhopper
(33,587 posts)completely dismantled. She was the worst.