General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow Bernie Sanders’ supporters are planning to shake up the Democratic convention
STEVEN ROSENFELD, ALTERNET
20 JUL 2016 AT 00:16 ET
Veep protests, amendment fights, interrupting Hillary.
Different camps inside Bernie Sanders 1,900-member delegation to the Democratic National Convention next week are anticipating varying degrees of protestssome telegraphing their intentions now, others planning in secretif Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party do not make additional major concessions.
These protests go beyond high-profile public announcements in recent days, such as scholar and activist Cornell West, who was appointed to the Platform Committee at Sanders request, announcing he would be supporting Jill Stein, the Green Party nominee in November.
On Saturday, a group called the Bernie Delegates Network announced that more than 250 Sanders delegates had responded to its poll about the acceptability of six possible centrist vice presidential picks: Sen. Tim Kaine, D-VA; HUD Secretary Julian Castro; Sen. Mark Warner, D-VA; Sen. Cory Booker, D-NJ; Admiral James Stavridis and Admiral Mike Mullen. All were overwhelmingly rejected, with a majority of respondents saying they would seriously consider publicly denouncing a centrist VP pick and/or nonviolently and emphatically protesting in the convention hall during Clintons acceptance speech.
You see in the survey if they close Tim Kaine, or someone like Tim Kaine, it could be a somewhat unruly convention, said Jeff Cohen, co-founder of RootsAction, which conducted the poll in partnership with Progressive Democrats of America. To have two corporate centrists on the ticket when 45 percent of voters were voting for a transformative progressive agenda is a slap in the face to them and to 1,900 delegates.
more
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/07/how-bernie-sanders-supporters-are-planning-to-shake-up-the-democratic-convention/
chillfactor
(7,576 posts)WE do not NEED a convention circus like the rethugs are putting on....what in the hell is wrong with these people?
Zing Zing Zingbah
(6,496 posts)That's not going to help the democrats, that's for sure. I guess they'd like to risk having Trump as president. They must not think he is all that bad.
Hoppy
(3,595 posts)sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)move again.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Wow, how did the Democratic party get to this place?
Response to AgingAmerican (Reply #90)
Post removed
brooklynite
(94,595 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)without any feeling that they abandoned their goals, merely going after them on a different time table.
And, btw, acting out at a convention is an entirely different thing from checking a box on a poll.
mythology
(9,527 posts)I think she's got a pretty good handle on what the average American voter wants.
kerry-is-my-prez
(8,133 posts)PERFECT? No. But they are a hell of a lot better than Trump/Spence. There's a bunch of people here who will NEVER be satisfied and will have a tantrum for one reason or another. Just face it you are a lost cause. Many have shown it over and over again that they are never going to vote Democratic. They should move on to a Trump site, libertarian or socialist.
brush
(53,787 posts)The primary is over. They should get behind the nominee and her pick.
I certainly hope the Sanders people don't pull some of the stuff that we're seeing at the repug show.
Bohunk68
(1,364 posts)It is not a winner take all, compromise and inclusivity are important. If you do not want people voting for you, then you exclude anything that might bring them over. Otherwise, it is sheer arrogance.
brush
(53,787 posts)Now Cornell West, who is now backing Jill Stein btw, and others, want a say in the Dem vp pick.
There's lunacy afoot with that reasoning.
The primary is over yet some seek to prolong the tussle with this unprecedented demand to have a say in the vp pick.
Bohunk68
(1,364 posts)It is a decision of the convention because.............they have to vote approval.
brush
(53,787 posts)It's the nominees choice. He/She vets who is on their short list and makes the decision. There is no approval by the convention.
This must be your first time getting involved in a campaign, right?
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)than any other candidate.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)pnwmom
(108,980 posts)She also listened to Bernie's supporters, and Bernie himself says the platform is excellent now.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)the large majority of the support she needs, or the majority AT ALL.
She must represent a wide variety of voters with all kinds of different life experience and views. And she has already compromised a lot. The arrogant ones are people who think they are so special that every single thing they want must be granted or they'll take their little balls and go home.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)Responsible ADULT Democrats understand that they vote for the nominee. Those who would withhold their vote as an act of extortion to get their way need to grow a skin and get over it.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)pnwmom
(108,980 posts)tonyt53
(5,737 posts)You think that the Republican show on the first day was anything? Watch the debacle of ours. Many of the people supporting Sanders aren't Democrats, they are anarchists. There is nothing that will placate them. Nothing. There will be screaming and major disruption both inside and out. They like to cite 1968 as their model. How'd that show at the convention work out for the Democrats in the general election?
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)KMOD
(7,906 posts)keeping the White House blue?
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)says they're going to vote for Hillary. But the holdouts could be anarchists or other disruptors.
Response to chillfactor (Reply #1)
Post removed
OnDoutside
(19,962 posts)Hoppy
(3,595 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)kerry-is-my-prez
(8,133 posts)you're still hanging around here for when you are NOT Democrats.
OnDoutside
(19,962 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)to choose someone to "represent the 99%" because what that 99% wants differs on many issues. No one gets all they want. That's democracy.
Compromise. Acceptance. Respect for the wishes and rights of others. These aren't dirty words. They are words borne of wisdom and understanding. It's like not railing against gravity every time it gets in the way. Instead we accept its reality, admire its power, and work with it.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)KMOD
(7,906 posts)That's all I ask.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Response to geek tragedy (Reply #22)
Post removed
auntpurl
(4,311 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Sheesh
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)KMOD
(7,906 posts)The folks at this site are committed to electing democrats.
If that's not your goal, GTFO.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)KMOD
(7,906 posts)Mike Pence just went on national television and hijacked your message.
He said Trump was creating a movement. He said Trump was bringing in independents and Democratic voters. He said Trump will bring Yuge change.
You can support his position, or you can support Hillary's. Those are your choices.
Your position is asinine. Your scorched earth policy is bullshit that will do great harm to people.
Here's what you need to deal with in your position.
You have two choices.
Let the whole world go to hell, or get off of your high horse, grow up, and realize the world doesn't revolve around you.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)I have no intentions of letting Trump get to the White House. I do have grave concerns about Clinton's ability to win, though. Not sure why you are laying whatever it is at MY feet. I haven't done a damn thing to thwart her efforts to win the general. But it is all up to her. David Sirota I think it was that predicted just this sort of behavior would be coming, though if I remember correctly I think he placed it AFTER November. I see we have started early.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)We don't have time to risk your petty, shitty games.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)What is your actual problem? I feel like your demeanor is sufficient to warrant an alert. WTF? Really? Wow...
KMOD
(7,906 posts)PS. David Sirota is an idiot.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)a little hostile, and I would certainly be pulled of crew if I acted like that at someone's doorstep.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)as if I would take advice from you.
I'm going to continue to work at getting the non delusional vote. Thankfully, they are the majority.
You, eh, you talk and walk like a trumper. Not going to waste my time with you.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)NBachers
(17,120 posts)One option: Full, enthusiastic participation and generous donations.
Another option: Low-wattage VP choice brings disillusionment, lack of participation, and a hold-the-nose vote.
And please, refrain from the boilerplate "If you're fine with Trump getting elected, then you've made your choice!" comment.
lapucelle
(18,275 posts)on the Democratic party platform committee.
So who exactly is the "we" you're talking about?
And can you actually define what you mean by "corporatist"?
bluedye33139
(1,474 posts)I especially love the fact that corporatism is a feature of Marxist, libertarian, liberal, neoliberal, socialist, communist, theocratic, Medieval, modern, and even prehistoric social organization. Kids in the past 12 months have thrown the word around as if it doesn't mean "indicating a society broken up into bodies or corpora."
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Platform committee is done.
lapucelle
(18,275 posts)It still needs to be presented at the convention.
It was a shame though, to see Sanders so badly pwned by West.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)This will also turn into a nothing burger.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)are partisans. I fully expect a significant number of lost potential Democratic votes. Some might well go to Trump, others just won't vote. It will be anything but a cake walk to November, as it appears the Republicans have looked past Trump's baggage.
brush
(53,787 posts)Hell, nit even half of the 17 former repug candidates are there at their convention,
Kacish is in Cleveland and won't even go to show support for Trump.
No they are in disarray. We just need to maintain, not do anything stupid at our convention and get out our vote.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)as you say...
liberal N proud
(60,336 posts)How they got in to the Convention should be looked into.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)still_one
(92,219 posts)tonyt53
(5,737 posts)csziggy
(34,136 posts)by Fortune Staff
July 12, 2016, 12:45 PM EDT
<SNIP>
Secretary Clinton has won the Democratic nominating process, and I congratulate her for that. She will be the Democratic nominee for president and I intend to do everything I can to make certain she will be the next president of the United States.
I have come here today not to talk about the past but to focus on the future. That future will be shaped more by what happens on November 8 in voting booths across our nation than by any other event in the world. I have come here to make it as clear as possible as to why I am endorsing Hillary Clinton and why she must become our next president.
<SNIP>
It is no secret that Hillary Clinton and I disagree on a number of issues. Thats what this campaign has been about. Thats what democracy is about. But I am happy to tell you that at the Democratic Platform Committee which ended Sunday night in Orlando, there was a significant coming together between the two campaigns and we produced, by far, the most progressive platform in the history of the Democratic Party. Our job now is to see that platform implemented by a Democratic Senate, a Democratic House and a Hillary Clinton president and I am going to do everything I can to make that happen.
<SNIP>
Hillary Clinton will make an outstanding president and I am proud to stand with her here today.
http://fortune.com/2016/07/12/transcript-bernie-sanders-endorsement/
Emphasis added by me.
If Bernie supporters are willing to undercut Hillary Clinton for some pipe dream that Bernie Sanders will be able to take away her nomination, they are working AGAINST everything Sen. Sanders said in his speech.
If Bernie Sanders cares about this country he needs to get in front of cameras and tell his followers to support Hillary Clinton. He needs to tell them that childish antics are not good for the country or for for the movement that supported him.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)pnwmom
(108,980 posts)than he -- to make her the nominee, and he endorsed her.
bluedye33139
(1,474 posts)What is a political party for? Should I belong to a party only if every member of that party agrees with every one of my ideas?
Of course not. The party is a coalition, and there has to be a balance between ideology and policy goals in real time. We have objectives, we argue about whether they are important and how to reach them, and then we craft legislation aimed at that. Legislation in the real world always falls short, always. There is no perfect legislation. Somebody's Pet Project is going to be put on the back burner. That is reality. You deal with it and you move on.
I often get offended by non Democrats who thought they could install a non Democrat as the party's nominee. I don't want to be argumentative, but didn't they lose?
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)Issue to be at the top of the agenda.
They have a right to protest, it's guaranteed in the first amendment.
You don't have to agree with what they're protesting about, and YOU also have the right to protest against their protest, bit to argue that they loss and need to be silent and accept the outcome goes against the very fabric of this country.
As long as it's peaceful, it's legal and as a lifelong Democratic Party member and former employee of the party I welcome their right to protest.
bluedye33139
(1,474 posts)Delegates do not have an absolute right to protest and create mayhem within the private space that is a political National Convention.
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)bluedye33139
(1,474 posts)I wonder if you understand the actual protocols going on here. A party convention and a party's bylaws and officers are all private matters, subject to the discretion of party leadership. Can I name the Green Party's nominee? Can I exclaim my rage when I see by-laws in the Green operating rulebook that I disagree with? No, because the Green Party is a private organization of private citizens, and it governs itself.
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)Will not upset you because they hold a different viewpoint.
I am so happy that this party is not like that.
bluedye33139
(1,474 posts)I want a party that is a coalition of liberals, progressives, centrists and moderates working together by a playbook and creating intelligent policy. Democrats tend to disagree with each other on many things, and until 2016 we did so with passion and with an understanding that just because someone doesn't agree with you, you don't get to throw chairs at them or call them a whore. I want a party in which children don't have meltdowns because their little Pied Piper hasn't hypnotized the entire world.
You really didn't know that the government was distinct from the political conventions until today? You're learning that now? I am glad to be of help to you, and the answer to my rhetorical questions above is: No, I can't name the Green Party nominees, that is a job for people who actually belong to the Green Party. The parties are distinct from the state. First amendment protections do not compel conventions to allow all attendees to speak, because the First Amendment does not govern private space and private organizations.
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)I know that political parties are distinct from government, and nowhere did I suggest otherwise.
The purpose of the convention is to listen to the people as well as the people listening to the nominee. Many meetings take place out of site from the cameras, policy is discussed and triaged to figure which issues should be tackled first.
If you don't know that protesting goes on behind the scenes of the stage, then you really know nothing about the DNC convention.
I've been to every DNC convention since I WAS 6 years old and my most vivid memory from that convention is when President Carter sent my father to speak with Jesse Jackson and I sat quietly in the corner as my dad and Mr. Jackson got into a screaming match that ended with Mr. Jackson walking out
People also protest outside.
bluedye33139
(1,474 posts)No one has a First Amendment right to speak at any political convention because the conventions are not the state.
People primarily protest outside. People also attempt to get attention inside the convention at times but the behavior inside the convention is subject to rules. On this topic, we are as one as long as the idea that everybody can protest to an unlimited extent within a convention is discarded.
I wouldn't tell that Jackson story when the question of white progressives and their disdain for people of color comes up. As this primary demonstrated, people of color are one of the primary strengths of the Democratic Party.
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)bluedye33139
(1,474 posts)Exilednight
(9,359 posts)bluedye33139
(1,474 posts)have an absolute and total right to be there, in fact they have a duty to be there. O'Malley delegates and Sanders and Clinton delegates
I recommend and support their attendance.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)"They have a right to protest, it's guaranteed in the first amendment."
Walk away
(9,494 posts)tallahasseedem
(6,716 posts)Me neither. Maybe the DNC should expand the vote over a couple of days in order to prevent interruptions and lengthy counts.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)Walk away
(9,494 posts)I'm not even sure what is going on here but it's soul sucking.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)Walk away
(9,494 posts)but not here anymore. I use this place to keep up with old friends and find links to news etc.
When you are in the middle of a history making presidential campaign and you want your candidate to win, you might prefer to be in an atmosphere that is excited and positive about her.
I rarely stop in these days and almost never stray into any general discussions. I'm looking for news about the upcoming convention to chat about on some Democratic web sites. I thought I would forage around here and see what I could dig up and look what I found!
frankieallen
(583 posts)Walk away
(9,494 posts)I'm surprised that my innocuous comment generated such sincere wishes to hear my thoughts on Bernie Sanders and his supporters. I feel honored! But, as I said, I use this site to keep in touch with friends.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Walk away
(9,494 posts)I don't have to figure out what is "legal" and what isn't.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)...right?
Loki
(3,825 posts)That's a rather interesting idea. You want complete satisfaction and complete compitulation? I'm sorry you feel so left out. I think the Democratic Platform is very inclusive, but if you feel differently, then by all means, vote for whom you think BEST represents you in its entirety , and if there is a viable candidate that does, by all means support them. I will, and do intend to support the Democratic party and its candidate, as you will do yours, whomever that may be.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)They need to keep that crap in their mothers basement.
Response to giftedgirl77 (Reply #11)
ChisolmTrailDem This message was self-deleted by its author.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Way to GOTV! Bravo!
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)KMOD
(7,906 posts)And who are you getting out the vote for?
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)an answer to that question.
auntpurl
(4,311 posts)The last thing we need is a bunch of disruption. We need a united, positive event that sharply draws the distinctions between the kid's table of the Repub convention and the adult's table of the Dem convention.
Unfortunately, we've got some "kids" in our own party that seem willing to risk a Trump presidency just to...I don't even know.
I am worried. Bernie's endorsement was marred somewhat by the yelling of the Bernie supporters in the crowd. I really don't want to see that writ large at the convention. I very much hope the DNC has a solid plan for shutting down disruption before it's on camera.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)A corporate ticket guarentees Trump wins.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)a group of pretentious little shits gets a taste of power and runs with it instead of working with the greater powers.
End result-- they waste their time and everyone else's while getting nothing done.
If they try hard enough, they could lose us the election.
Response to TreasonousBastard (Reply #16)
Post removed
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)Exactly, and you are too kind in that description, IMO. I agree with all but the last comment. Those who would disrupt the Dem Convention were never going to support the Dem candidate anyway - unless it was Bernie. We CAN win without them. We just have to work harder.
The more they continue like this, the less credibility they - and Bernie - have insofar as I am concerned. They become exactly like the GOPers in Congress - obstructing everything until they get their own way, no matter the cost to everyone else, the country, or the world. That is, unless Bernie shuts this down. Which he will not do, IMO.
If he does, I will be impressed and give him full kudos for doing so.
People have literally bent over backwards in unprecedented ways to accommodate the LOSER of the Dem primaries. For these holdouts (and they are only a tiny percentage of Bernie supporters, thank heavens), NOTHING will EVER be enough except perhaps for the Convention to declare Bernie the nominee.
That is simply NOT going to happen.
Paladin
(28,264 posts)reflection
(6,286 posts)But Bernie and/or his "acolytes" can't put Trump in the White House. They can only vote like anyone else.
If HRC feels that she has to capture more of the Bernie supporter vote, then she will make the necessary adjustments to do so.
If she feels that she's already peeled off enough of them, and the others are beyond hope, then she'll stand pat.
Time will tell if she miscalculates. I still think she mops the floor with Trump either way, wait until the debates are over (if Trump even agrees to debate) and I bet the differential between her and Agent Orange will become huge.
Disclaimer: I am a Bernie supporter, I will reluctantly vote for Hillary, and I think most others will vote for her also.
YMMV
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)lapucelle
(18,275 posts)and why are you characterizing Hillary as being part of one?
What exactly are you talking about?
Hillary was my senator. In NY, she worked very hard for middle and working class families.
My husband, an FDNY 9/11 survivor, became seriously ill after working for months on the pile and at the dump, but he wasn't the right kind of sick to qualify for specialized programs for the first responders. There were many others in the same boat. Hillary learned about the problem and got funding for a medical monitoring program at one of the best hospitals in the city for people like my husband.
Hillary also persuaded a pharmaceutical company to provide medications at cost. The price of my husband's meds went from $800 a month to $60.
I can't begin to tell you what a difference Hillary's hard work and persistence made for me, my three children, and especially for my husband who the GOP had celebrated and then forgot. Hillary was there for us.
auntpurl
(4,311 posts)Oh, also, you'll never get an answer re: "corporate ticket". The word (along with oligarch, establishment, and third way) has become meaningless.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)xmas74
(29,674 posts)Stories and anecdotes like this need to be brought up every single time someone claims she's never done anything for anyone outside of Wall Street.
OnDoutside
(19,962 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)They can do whatever they wish.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)But that doesn't exclude them from being selfish jerks.
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)small subset, certainly not all.
madokie
(51,076 posts)I really like this family
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)The whiny adolescent narcissists who want to throw a temper tantrum on the floor in order to get attention for themselves are a small minority.
People who can't process the idea that others disagree with them have no place inside that hall.
auntpurl
(4,311 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)You really don't believe in getting out the vote, do you?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Sanders supporters, as I said in my first post on this subject.
They're a fringe group who attached themselves to his campaign like barnacles to a ship.
Same kooks who voted for McKinney/Nader/Stein in the past.
As you can imagine, we have everything from the most die-hard Bernie Busters, Bernal said, speaking of the 200-member California delegation and its counterparts. In terms of the people who occupy that universe, they are almost indistinguishable from protesters you will see outside the convention. Under no circumstance will they ever vote for Hillary. Theyre very protest-minded That goes all the way to the other end of the spectrum, which is the eventual nominee types. These are all Bernie delegates.
Most Sanders supporters will behave as dignified adults.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)And as such are you qualified to speak for us?
GOTV is to some as Kryptonite is to Superman.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)She won the primary.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)narcissism being contemplated in this article.
We will see for ourselves.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)GoneOffShore
(17,340 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Perhaps you should listen to your own advise?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)that didn't go their way.
Most Sanders supporters, as adults, recognize that Clinton won because she got more votes, so temper tantrums are inappropriate.
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)Mike Nelson
(9,959 posts)...Bernie should release his delegates and move to make Hillary's nomination unanimous. Let's win this!
GusBob
(7,286 posts)It would be the most disrespectful thing they could do. It would make a lot of headlines.
It would make a lot of waves too. Women and minorities across the country would recognize the burning feeling.
Go for it you tough guys
Politicub
(12,165 posts)ends up being a shart. But I guess that's the luck of the draw.
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)bigwillq
(72,790 posts)Hillary is going to be the nominee no matter what they do.
If they want to protest, good for them. That is their right.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)...or not
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)And there will be a unified front.
A small group of protestors is not going to change that.
Bohunk68
(1,364 posts)I thought there were new rules, but I am seeing the same old nastiness being exhibited.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)No, you wanna be selfish because you didn't get your unicorn. Guess what THERE ARE NO UNICORNS!
jonno99
(2,620 posts)A freak-show will definitely leave a bad impression on the indys that are on the fence - watching & listening to both campaigns...
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)The committees will meet and do their work, the outcomes voted on at convention. This will be yet another situation where having roots in politics matters. Showing up to convention and making a scene will achieve nothing. Bernie has stated his support for electing Hillary and will do what he needs to at convention to formalize that. A group of folks carrying on out on the convention floor will be just that, nothing more.
You have to have an insurmountable block of support to overcome a realistically expected outcome. I witnessed it once at a MI Dem convention in Detroit. Nomination for AG. It was exciting and, indeed, the masses prevailed with a landslide vote. This situation is very, very different.
I just hope they don't embarrass themselves too much but they do not have the power to turn our convention into a shit show, though I reckon it's a fun daydream for some.
Julie
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)They didn't get the candidate they wanted, they didn't get ALL the concessions they wanted so now here comes the pathetic childish hissy fit. They make me sick.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Or do you think that we need their votes?
Simple question...
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)There's an obvious choice to be made in November - they need to make it and stop whining for their pony.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)uponit7771
(90,347 posts)... but with more snark
Response to uponit7771 (Reply #53)
Name removed Message auto-removed
KMOD
(7,906 posts)Response to KMOD (Reply #64)
Name removed Message auto-removed
KMOD
(7,906 posts)It was evident in the open primaries that some republicans voted for Senator Sanders.
Response to KMOD (Reply #70)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Response to Sheepshank (Reply #67)
Name removed Message auto-removed
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)It's pretty obvious you don't even know what far-left means LOL
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)... I'll stay far away from it
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)The alternative is to move to the right. Are you moving far to the right to get away from them now?
KMOD
(7,906 posts)Have you actually watched the Republican convention?
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)He has already said that he will do anything in his power to elect Hillary...but they wont have it. Sound like these people are just anarchist who were using him.
Yes, I remember the PUMAS. I also remember that when Hillary asked for unity and support for Obama, she got it...That's a true leader
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Don't you know what a leader is?
From Merriam-Webster:
b (1) : a person who directs a military force or unit (2) : a person who has commanding authority or influence
That's what leader means. If these people go ahead and disrupt the convention after Sanders said he will do everything to get Hillary elected, well, it shows he has no influence, IOW, he's no leader.
If those followers are only with him when he does what they want, then, who is the leader? Sounds more like they were using him to push their agenda.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)(or anyone's) sway will drop off dramatically and sharply. So there is no sense including him at all in any equation. Now, what did you mean other than that?
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)a seat at a table they really don't want to be seated at.
hard to give these people my respect when they want to turn the DNC Convention into a bigger, more divisive circus than what is occurring this week in Cleveland.
seanbnewyork4
(32 posts)Bernie is a wake up call for the establishment. Thanks to him, the Democratic platform has become more progressive.
dvduval
(260 posts)Go too far left and the Democrats lose. It is that simple. I am more left than Bernie, but I'm smart enough to know the voters in the center will decide the next President.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Go to the left and the Democrats win.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)candidate herself to win the votes. That is always how it works.
prayin4rain
(2,065 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)The Midway Rebel
(2,191 posts)And they are young. The handwriting is on the wall.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)OregonBlue
(7,754 posts)We don't need a three ring circus like the RNC convention but that's what they are planning. Do they really want Trump to win so that things will get so bad the nation will reject conservatism. Because, it's starting to seem like they are working to defeat Hillary and elect Trump.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)And they are correct in doing so
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)Maybe you wanted to have the convention held on blankets on a farmer's field-- kinda like Woodstock or something. But most delegates would rather attend the convention in a comfortable conference hall owned by . . . a corporation.
Deal with it.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)and everything was hunky-dory?
mike_c
(36,281 posts)Sorry, not gonna play.
LuvNewcastle
(16,846 posts)arthritisR_US
(7,288 posts)Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)liberal N proud
(60,336 posts)And will put another black eye on BS.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)The nerve of them!
KMOD
(7,906 posts)Are you seriously calling our Democratic nominee a right winger?
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Centrist = to the right
KMOD
(7,906 posts)Cut the shit, already.
liberal N proud
(60,336 posts)I doubt anything Hillary does will appease you.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Bernie Sanders is handling this like a mature adult. I am confident most of his delegates will follow his example.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I thought Shrill was on the bad word list.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Democat
(11,617 posts)They are endorsing right wingism.
liberal N proud
(60,336 posts)What ever wingism is.
But it will help donald trump and that will not be good for the protesters or the country.
frankieallen
(583 posts)We were united, and voted FOR Obama, this time we are split, and voting AGAINST Trump.
Were fucked.
Avalon Sparks
(2,566 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)Good lord.
Grammar is not that hard.
Response to frankieallen (Reply #112)
silvershadow This message was self-deleted by its author.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)There's going to be a tremendous temptation for speakers at the Dem convention to stomp on the still warm corpse.
Hekate
(90,714 posts)...and what is the response of our dear friends on the Left?
Pardon me while I do a rendition of a norovirus sufferer
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)They stand for war, bigotry and authoritarianism. They want everyone to be able to buy AR-15s with no background checks, but their platform calls pornography a "public health crisis".
Do you support bigotry, greed, or censorship?
I don't.
I doubt this "Sanders group" in the article really speaks for very many people, frankly.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)Self-entitled brats.
democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)I believe the delegates have to vote to approve the VP nominee. The custom is to defer to the nominee's choice but technically the delegates have the power to nominate or not nominate a proposed VP candidate.
I remember reading in 2008 that if McCain picked Joe Lieberman the Republican delegates might have refused to nominate him because he was pro choice.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)It's not going to happen. Those who didn't support her in the Primaries are likely the ones who want to dictate terms to her now. i.e., choice of VP. They need to let it go already.
nitpicker
(7,153 posts)(snip)
((in reaction to a Q&A email suggesting that there was a way for Sanders to win))
There are adherents to that strain of thinking, but its not very big, said Karen Bernal, a Sanders delegate from Sacramento elected as a co-representative of the California delegation, the nation's largest. In a half-hour interview, she described a half-dozen different camps under the Bernie umbrella: the Bernie or Bust crew, reflected in the Q&A e-mail; a similiar subset that thinks the partys superdelegates, or hundreds of party insiders and elected officials, can still be swayed to pick Sanders; people, like those in the VP poll, who say they are willing to publicly protest on the floor; those who agree with those protesters but would not disrupt the proceedings; those who will follow whatever directions Sanders or the campaign says; and eventual nominee types, who tend to be elected or aspiring politicians, who will back Clinton.
(snip)
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I think our convention is going to be GREAT, and we are going to be united in support of our ticket, our candidates, and our platform.
It will stand in stark contrast to this slo-mo dumpster fire in Cleveland.
MFM008
(19,816 posts)I'm sure after watching this slow-motion disaster in Cleveland most Democrats are going to make sure that we look pretty darn good next week.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)I'm counting on you, Ms. Clinton, to prove you are the person who can lead this parade.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)Takket
(21,577 posts)Bernie has endorsed Hillary. If they really claim to support Bernie, they would follow his lead. Otherwise they are only interested in disruption for their own amusement. The RNC is coming off one of the absolute worst conventions maybe in the history of this nation. Don't lower the DNC to their standards.