General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTwitter permanently bans Milo Yiannopoulos
I won't put on DU what I'm saying to myself about "Nero" right now. It would likely get me tombstoned.
https://www.buzzfeed.com/charliewarzel/twitter-just-permanently-suspended-conservative-writer-milo?utm_term=.hq4ezkpw7#.lsaGYkPKp
Twitter has banned one of its most notoriously contentious voices. On Tuesday evening, the microblogging service permanently suspended the account of conservative commentator Milo Yiannopoulos, a day after he incited his followers to bombard Ghostbusters star Leslie Jones with racist and demeaning tweets.
Yiannopoulos, who currently serves as Breitbart.coms tech editor, has been hailed as a voice of the new alt-right movement. As such, he has made a living as a provocateur, continually inflaming tensions between progressive branches of the internet focused on identity politics and the fervently anti-PC segment that constantly trolls it. For years, Yiannopoulous has used Twitter not only to voice his controversial opinions, but to direct his legion of followers (388,042 at the time of this writing) toward his opponents. As a result, hes been temporarily banned from Twitter a number of times for violating its terms of service and stripped of his verification.
mroe
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Jeffersons Ghost
(15,235 posts)This is "REAL GOOD" for children! Please think "happy thoughts," as the movie demands. Have you ever seen a "gopher with three heads?"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3180201/Trump-defends-big-game-hunting-sons-shamed-Twitter-posing-trophy-kills-including-leopard-elephant-death-Cecil-lion.html
Donald Trump defending sons' sport killing of exotic African animals may finally doom billionaire blowhard's campaign
http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/stasi-hed-article-1.2311902
"HUNTER KILLS LARGEST AFRICAN ELEPHANT AND POISONS DOZENS MORE"
IT'S A GOOD LIFE "You be dead!" said this kid
scscholar
(2,902 posts)That alone means he needs to be silenced.
tritsofme
(17,380 posts)Skittles
(153,169 posts)you can even be banned from DU for such behavior
tritsofme
(17,380 posts)Closing a Twitter account does not leave one silenced, which is what that person advocates...
What does that mean? I'd like to know too.
Skittles
(153,169 posts)he's free to spew his racist, sick trash where assholes appreciate him
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)he can stand on the street corner and scream his filth
63splitwindow
(2,657 posts)Of course once they see how lucrative it is they will milk it for all it is worth.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)he was not silenced
Explain that one to me. How do you know what's in other peoples' minds, and what makes you think you're any sort of arbiter on who needs to be 'silenced', whatever that means?
tallahasseedem
(6,716 posts)on Twitter. Vile and disgusting. Definitely not a loss.
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)Initech
(100,081 posts)I saw Ghostbusters on Sunday and it was really good. Better than I had expected. Leslie Jones doesn't deserve this.
Onyrleft
(344 posts)The crap he posted was disgusting. He's a Breitbart scumbag and I hope she sues them all into abject poverty.
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)It's like a remake of Duck Soup. It's a totally needless remake of an already perfect original.
I just bought tickets for me, my wife, my daughter, and her boyfriend at two different showings of the new Ghostbusters. If you go to the original link, these are terrible, horrible human beings, and even on DU I can't say what I really think of them. I can, however, show the world with my wallet.
(It's still probably going to suck, but at least I now have sixty bucks towards the sequel )
herding cats
(19,565 posts)You can say what you like...that's free speech. What you can't do is say it on privately owned venues when it breaches their TOS.
I like seeing abusive speech banned from social media. It sends a powerful message to those using such speech.
KT2000
(20,583 posts)is disgusting and should be against the law, not just Twitter rules.
Crowman1979
(3,844 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Bottom feeders, attacking women gee how original that is all they know how to do.
LuvLoogie
(7,011 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)kcr
(15,317 posts)I'd say it's because there are a vast array of other choices for pizza. You just can't have that pizza. So the claim that his pizza rights have been violated would be an overstatement. Kind of like the claim that his free speech rights have been violated just because one social media venue didn't tolerate his vile spew.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)We don't have a constitutional right to use Twitter any more than we have a constitutional right to post on DU.
Lots of people don't understand this, unfortunately.
It is amazing how many people really do not understand the 1st Amendment.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)but why take it out on the actors? She was offered a roll, she took it.
Warpy
(111,277 posts)because reading seems to be a low priority for studio honchos. They'll blow millions on special effects but script writers? Oh why not just let the actors ad lib their way through a story board? It'll seem real that way.
Unfortunately, it's also boring as hell that way.
In addition, there are few women's roles where they're not just props to be used by men.
It's a good thing so many great movies are being made offshore. They're rarely being made here.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)and keeping things within the themes you wish to use.
There are only so many themes that movies, books, TV, epics, stories, legends, etc. use, and they only number a dozen or so.
Also, please bear in mind that all of these themes, or tropes, whatever you call them, are as old as dirt. Its very hard to be original when people have been retelling the same shit for probably tens of thousands of years now, since the beginning of complex language at least.
To give examples, there's the Hero's Journey, let's see, some of homer's epics, a LOT of westerns are like this, Star Wars, Star War VII(obviously), The Princess Bride, Three Musketeers, hmm, a Knight's Tale(both original Chaucer and the movie).
Ghostbusters falls under this theme as well, but for a team, rather than just a single individual, and it follows the conventions established a long time ago about how such teams are set up. The thing that's important is that the story is told well, the universe follows its own conventions so the audience isn't lost, etc.
Excellent examples of a different type of movie, the new Dredd movie, its not original(based on a comic book), but told well, and frankly I'd like to see them explore more of the Dredd universe they started to establish with that movie. In fact, I would tentatively call it an Americanized version of "The Raid" with slightly toned down violence. Similar themes and premise, even a similar setting of sorts(a single building), the enemy was even similar(drug lord). Both are excellent movies, but there are enough differences for both to stand on their own. I loved both, and would recommend the subtitled version of "The Raid" and its sequel as well. Its also worth mentioning that "The Raid" isn't completely original either, and I definitely got vibes of "Die Hard" from it.
Action_Patrol
(845 posts)But it was both written and into production before The Raid. The Raid just made it to screen first.
Dredd should have been a huge hit. It was just a victim of it's crappy predecessor and bad marketing.
Orrex
(63,216 posts)Terrific performance by Urban in a great examples of a performer "inhabiting" a character. And you can't even see most of his face!
I agree with you completely re: its predecessor and its marketing.
Action_Patrol
(845 posts)From multiple chapters being told. Would love to see more of that universe.
Instead we get sequels to tripe like "XxX"
Orrex
(63,216 posts)Surprisingly, I didn't even know that the film existed until I stumbled upon it on NetFlix, and I couldn't believe how good it was. I only read Judge Dredd sporadically during my youth, because it wasn't available locally where I grew up, but it got the tone, the feel, the look and the attitude exactly right IMO. Even the "star-scrapers" were great, and they set up the promise of entire storytelling universes contained within each building.
I've heard that Urban wants to do another Dredd film with NetFlix or Amazon, but I don't know the current status.
Action_Patrol
(845 posts)Regardless of what format that may be.
I hope it happens. A Netflix series would work great for me. Technology has come a long way
Orrex
(63,216 posts)So many "revivals" of old shows. Why don't they do something creative and new?
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)a rip off of 'Koran-o-rama: the Musical. 'All The Way' has to be the umpteenth play about LBJ and really it's just 'Hamilton' set in the 60's with more white people. 'Fun Home' might was well be Gold Diggers of 1934, for the love of Mike!
Orrex
(63,216 posts)Last edited Wed Jul 20, 2016, 10:26 AM - Edit history (1)
Yes, Swiss Army Man is the thousandth remake of Jane Eyre.
Although the majority of highly successful films are sequels or remakes, whose fault is that? If it's such a terrible trend, and if Hollywood is so disastrously lacking in creativity, then discerning movie-goers should vote with their dollars and only buy tickets for independent films based on original screenplays.
For that matter, sequels and remakes are hardly a new phenomenon. There were at least seven Wizard of Oz films before Judy Garland donned the Technicolor-friendly Ruby Slippers. If Hollywood is lacking in creativity, it's only because it has always been lacking in creativity--just like live productions and print media.
How many productions of Hamlet have there been? Don't these silly theaters have any sense of originality?
Complaining about popular sequels and remakes is very close to self-congratulatory elitism.
Glassunion
(10,201 posts)Except for all of their really good new ideas.
jonno99
(2,620 posts)put butter on it!
(sorry couldn't resist!)
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)I left myself open for that, and I like real butter, too
Skittles
(153,169 posts)now more often than not it's hard to find good movies, so much cartoons and action hero crap
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Yes, Milo Yiannopoulos is the LGBT equivalent to an Uncle Tom.
Response to bluestateguy (Original post)
Post removed
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)tenderfoot
(8,437 posts)eom
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)Witty and eloquent????
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)Response to Post removed (Reply #26)
Post removed
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,182 posts)He's no "witty, eloquent troll." He's an asshole with one of the serious cases of Backpfeifengesicht you will ever see in your life.
He's a piece of shit who rallies other pieces of shit to do shitty things. His purported sexual orientation has absolutely zilch to diminish that fact (other than creating an odd paradox where you have ultra-bigoted alt-righters proclaiming their love of a supposedly gay guy.)
A little primer for you on free speech and the First Amendment: IT DOES NOT APPLY TO SOCIAL MEDIA. SOCIAL MEDIA IS NOT THE GOVERNMENT BUT RATHER A PRIVATE ENTITY AND CAN DO WHATEVER IT LIKES. GET THAT THROUGH YOUR LITTLE PRECIOUS HEAD.
The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)He broke the TOS of a private business and they acted in their own interests.
And twitter has banned plenty of others over things as well (isis for example, who keeps making new accounts, so he is in good company).
His free speech is intact.
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)are definitely not terms that most thinking individuals would use when describing Milo Yannopoulos. The sooner that serial loser and permavictim disappears from public view the better.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)And good riddance.
I've been absolutely horrified by this Leslie Jones story.
Chathamization
(1,638 posts)It says:
Linking to another article - that talks about racist tweets, but doesn't mention Milo Yiannopoulos at all. So I guess he was behind those tweets and they found out later? He was encouraging his followers to attack her? Or maybe even encouraging his followers to attack her based on her race? I don't know. It'd be nice if the article could actually tell us what happened.
Chathamization
(1,638 posts)Worth looking at those tweets - he was "retweeting" disgusting slur filled fake tweets and pretending they came from Jones (the article includes a lot of other things he did). Not sure why almost all the other articles about this are so vague about what actually happened.
erpowers
(9,350 posts)Milo Yiannopoulos got exactly what he deserved. This is not a free speech issue. His free speech rights have not been abridged. His encouragement of his followers to say racist things about Leslie Jones was just wrong. The sad part is that online Republicans are supporting him.
DLevine
(1,788 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,989 posts)I hate that fucker