General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKansas City takes on Citizens United
KC Move to Amend is the Kansas City chapter of Move to Amend. Over the last few weeks we've been circulating petitions in Kansas City, Mo with the following language:We, the undersigned residents of Kansas City, Missouri, urge the Kansas City, Missouri City Council to pass the following resolution:
RESOLVED, the People of Kansas City, Missouri, stand with communities across the country to defend democracy from the corrupting effects of undue corporate power by amending the United States Constitution to establish that:
- Only human beings, not corporations, are endowed with constitutional rights, and
- Money is not speech, and therefore regulating political contributions and spending is not equivalent to limiting political speech."
Tomorrow, June 13, Kansas City Move to Amend (KCMTA) members will deliver copies of our petition, with over 3,000 signatures, to the KCMO City Council. We expect them to vote on the resolution Thursday, June 14. The actual resolution to be voted on by the KCMO City Council incorporates the above language from our petition, plus a lot of 'WHEREAS's to make it sound more official. Full text of the resolution HERE.
Here are some excerpts from the press release sent out by KC Move to Amend:
Amendment Needed to Overturn U.S. Supreme Courts Citizens United Ruling
Kansas City MO Citizens will hold a public Press Conference and hope to celebrate the City Councils approval of a resolution designed to curb corporate power in elections which is scheduled for a vote on June 14, 2012.
Read the rest of the press release on Tony's Kansas City blog.
KC Move to Amend is so confident of passage of the resolution that we're planning a celebration and press conference following the vote. For those in the Kansas City Metro area, come join us at All Souls Unitarian Universalist Church, 4501 Walnut Street at 7:00PM Thursday, June14. There will be refreshments and live music by a local musician. Someone has already arranged for videotaping of the event for a YouTube video (I promise to post it here!).
We'll also be discussing where to go next. The current resolution is just for Kansas City, MO. There are other communities in the Kansas City Metro area on both sides of the Kansas / Missouri state line.
Someone is certainly going to ask: "What good does it do to have a resolution supporting a constitutional amendment from a city council? Certainly nice; but, it doesn't get the job done (of amending the Constitution)." That's certainly true; all we're asking for right now is a show of support from KC and the 200 other communities around the nation. The process of amending the Constitution has just started. It's going to be a long, long, uphill battle and we realize that.
For more information on Move to Amend, it's drive to amend the constitution and the issues involved, go to the Frequently Asked Questions page on the Move to Amend website; also check out their links. Find out if there's a Move to Amend chapter near you; if not, start one.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)So the offices of DemocraticUndergound LLC could be searched by the police for no reason, and all of its assets could be confiscated without compensation.
Bad amendment.
EOTE
(13,409 posts)And those people are still protected by the 4th amendment, right?
Indydem
(2,642 posts)Corporations are owned by people, and thus they are protected under the 1st amendment.
Their argument, as I understand it, is that since corporations are made up of shareholders (people) they get the same rights as people.
Bandit
(21,475 posts)I would venture it is a limit that Corporations do not have to follow..
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)in Federal elections. Citizens United did not address or modify this law.
For example, individuals can contribute up to $2500 to a Presidential candidate. Corporations can contribute zero. I hope this answers your question.
LongTomH
(8,636 posts)It's at the top of their Frequently Asked Questions page:
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)and the computer servers and other hardware would be corporate-owned assets.
LongTomH
(8,636 posts)...you spend some time on Move to Amend's Frequently Asked Questions page and/or their Recommended Reading page, and yes, I need to spend some time there too.
In October, 2011, I submitted a post about the the 1886 Santa Clara County vs. Southern Pacific Railroad decision by another corrupt Supreme Court which fastened the concept of corporate personhood on us.
There's a lot of information out on the web for those willing to do a little digging. I do suggest my colleagues do their homework before they defend the idea that "corporations are people."
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)It's an extremely poorly thought through proposal with absolutely zero chance of coming anywhere near passing. They are simply doing it to cash in on donations.
And it's moronic to boot. These sort of "statement" laws may in principle sound helpful but they really dumb down society.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)chieftain
(3,222 posts)LongTomH
(8,636 posts)I'll do my best to keep you informed. The fight to overturn Citizens United has just begun!