General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMen Probably Too Hormonal and Moody to be Trusted with Important Financial Decisions
News from the world of science with some pretty grim implications for the global economy as it currently exists: men rational, level-headed, decisionmaking men aren't actually very well equipped to handle important financial decisions at all; it's like they're getting the male equivalent of their periods, but all the time. In fact, men are so beholden to their volatile hormones that their prominence in the world of finance may actually doom the whole system to inevitable, testosterone-fueled collapse.
A new book postulates that the nature of financial markets combined with the physiological effects of testosterone make for a veritable clusterfuck of overreaction, which ends up exaggerating both good and bad news and artificially prolonging both booms and busts. This conclusion is based on research that analyzed traders' spit during several market sessions which found that men working in the high-risk, high-reward setting of the world of finance experience hormone fluctuations that could seriously interfere with their ability to make good decisions. Per Bloomberg,
In other words, The Invisible Hand exists, but it can't come to the phone right now because it's on some powerful pain killers after it got mad and smashed through a plate glass window and needed like 50 stitches. And actually, it might be more accurate to refer to The Invisible Hand as The Invisible Testicles.
more
http://jezebel.com/5917383/men-probably-too-hormonal-and-moody-to-be-trusted-with-important-financial-decisions
banned from Kos
(4,017 posts)good stuff.
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)Jezebel took a few extra jabs reporting it, is all. Sounds like the book and the Bloomberg article are stone sober:
Now at the University of Cambridge, Coates turned to neuroscience after working for a decade at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Deutsche Bank AG, where he ran a trading desk. Even before his experiments, his practical experience during the dot- com bubble convinced him that the markets were running on something deeper than dispassionate reason. Normally a sober and prudent lot, as he recalls, traders were becoming by small steps euphoric and delusional. They were overconfident in their risk-taking, placing bets of ever-increasing size and ever worsening risk-reward trade-offs. As much as traders and investors try to remain rational, will power is no match for steroids that work their effects in every single cell in the body.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-06-10/what-traders-testosterone-tells-us-about-markets.html
banned from Kos
(4,017 posts)Soros, Chanos, Fink, etc.
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)suggests risky. Aggressive behavior out of control.
Confusious
(8,317 posts)Even aggressive people can see when they are going to loose.
Oh, and then there's just plain ol' fashion greed.
Which, in my experience, impacts both sexes equally.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)unreadierLizard
(475 posts)to justify pushing an extreme agenda.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)Countering flawed studies and assumptions about women with equally stupid ones about men.
If I said "how about we nuke the menstruation jokes and jokes about female emotions instead of engaging in crap like this" would that somehow be taken as misogynistic?
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)you knew the big B was coming, right?
But taking a strategy of non-engagement, keeping silent, turning the other cheek....women have done that for centuries. How'd that work for us?
Things didn't start changing until women/people started countering the hatred.
Satire is a form of speaking out.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)And before anyone accuses me of being one-sided, I've never seen anyone post how women's emotions are holding them back.
I don't propose non-engagement. I propose driving people into exile who make the comments about women that precipitated this particular satire. Lawrence Summers, for instance, should have been disgraced permanently for his sexist Harvard schtick about women in STEM.
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)Jezebel is making funny over a Bloomberg report. Bloomberg's not known for Onion-esque pieces. It's based on several studies and a recent book by a neuroscientist.
Coates makes a convincing case that physiology plays a central role in driving markets, one that is generally overlooked. This insight might well form the basis of new investment indexes, even funds, based on widespread real-time monitoring of the hormonal biochemistry of the investing population.
What's more, I don't think it's the least ridiculous or extreme. Doesn't take a neuroscientist to observe that obsessive, aggressive risk-taking is a by-product of testosterone.
I'm a little surprised to see people leaping in and assuming it's a joke.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)Seems to me to be quantifiable and quantified to the max. examining financial outcomes vis a vis hormonal fluctuations is brilliant b/c values are attached at both ends -- you can measure both chemicals and work performance (in dollars/pounds/etc). pretty cool.
Ashley96
(23 posts)dionysus
(26,467 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)DirkGently
(12,151 posts)Jezebel is adding some sauce, but the referenced sources are not satire. Here's a study. Not super jokey, near as I can tell.
http://www.pnas.org/content/105/16/6167.full.pdf
freshwest
(53,661 posts)DirkGently
(12,151 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)Overseas
(12,121 posts)ManyShadesOf
(639 posts)in "financial markets combined with the physiological effects of testosterone make for a veritable clusterfuck of overreaction" are totally fucked and answering to the actual "rational automatons of most financial theory" -- COMPUTERS!! TALKING TO EACH OTHER. FUCKING OVER JAPAN. ETC. FUCK YEAH! SNAFU.
&feature=relatedljm2002
(10,751 posts)..."PMS is that time of the month when women act the same way men act all the time." (just for the record, the friend was a man).
It is interesting to note that it was often women, rather than men, who blew the whistle on financial wrongdoing, or who tried to apply the brakes to financial overreaching. Examples: Sherron Watkins, the first one to expose the financial shenanigans at Enron; and Brooksley Born, whose attempts to regulate swaps were simply rejected by the likes of Alan Greenspan, Robert Rubin and Larry Summers. There was a lot of discussion about the Iceland situation, and how it was largely fueled by male bankers and traders. They have reacted by giving more women the reins in banking and in politics, with good results.
Also, there are studies showing that women tend to be better investors, while men tend to be paid more for their efforts in the investment world, even though they don't do as well as their female counterparts. Ah, well, what else is new.
Skittles
(153,164 posts)Good points.
Lucky Luciano
(11,257 posts)Then check the reaction.
just1voice
(1,362 posts)Too bad human beings and made up of chemicals and things, that darn science!
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)your man bags are safe.
for now.