Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mosaic

(1,451 posts)
Sat Jun 9, 2012, 08:05 AM Jun 2012

Little Britain: why the UK is no longer a superpower

Economic crisis apart, the United Kingdom is still a major player on the world stage, right? Wrong

[...]

It is not just a question of adopting a different system of taxation or limiting the ability of the commercial banks to create credit – however commendable those individual ideas may be in themselves. One hundred years of pretending to be a "big beast" have to end now. There has to be an acceptance, like that in Germany, France and Japan in 1945, that the country has hit rock bottom and needs to change. In football, this happens all the time: a new manager goes to a struggling club and proceeds to clear out the dead wood. This has never happened to the UK, and even now the country does not seem ready for the sort of cathartic moment that the defeated Axis powers had at the end of the second world war. Even now there is a belief that all will be well, that something will turn up, that Britain will muddle through. The temptation, as ever, will be to look at the events of the past decade as another occasion where disaster was averted by a whisker. The reality is different: this is the moment when the UK has to face the truth about its diminished status in the world.

• Extracted from Going South: Why Britain Will Have A Third World Economy By 2014

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/jun/08/why-uk-no-longer-superpower?CMP=twt_gu

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Little Britain: why the UK is no longer a superpower (Original Post) Mosaic Jun 2012 OP
Some historians attribute it to the loss exboyfil Jun 2012 #1
The open question is how long we can sustain our superpower status. lastlib Jun 2012 #2

exboyfil

(17,865 posts)
1. Some historians attribute it to the loss
Sat Jun 9, 2012, 08:29 AM
Jun 2012

of India as a colony. I can't find the exact quote but it is something like England is just an island without India. For a nation of their size and population they still do pretty well in comparison to other countries. They have a better health care system than we have. They still have many fine colleges and universities. They have a vibrant banking sector (not regulated enough though - just like ours). I would have a tendency to bet on them before I would Japan after we pull out of Asia (which will happen in the next 20 years in my opinion).

lastlib

(23,309 posts)
2. The open question is how long we can sustain our superpower status.
Sat Jun 9, 2012, 09:58 AM
Jun 2012

Given the loss of our maufacturing capacity, can we field a colossal military force far into the century? Can we sustain our national income levels by importing vastly more than we export?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Little Britain: why the U...