General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPensions may be cut to 'virtually nothing' for 407,000 people
http://money.cnn.com/2016/05/20/retirement/central-states-pension-fund/The Central States Pension Fund has no new plan to avoid insolvency, fund director Thomas Nyhan said this week. Without government funding, the fund will run out of money in 10 years, he said.
At that time, pension benefits for about 407,000 people could be reduced to "virtually nothing," he told workers and retirees in a letter sent Friday.
In a last-ditch effort, the Central States Pension Plan sought government approval to partially reduce the pensions of 115,000 retirees and the future benefits for 155,000 current workers. The proposed cuts were steep, as much as 60% for some, but it wasn't enough. Earlier this month, the Treasury Department rejected the plan because it found that it would not actually head off insolvency.
snip
A lot of the fund's companies went bankrupt after the trucking industry was deregulated in the 1980s. That's part of the reason the fund is in trouble now. It's currently paying out $3 for every $1 it takes in.
annabanana
(52,791 posts)better than closing corporate loopholes and taxing capital gains as if they were earned income
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)which of them voted for decades of tax cuts and screwing over others? I live in a very conservative area and fairly frequently bite my tongue on asking where people stood on thirty years of pro-business/anti-people policies as they complain about getting screwed over.
Depaysement
(1,835 posts)Real estate investments in Las Vegas casinos and hotels once threatened the integrity of a Teamsters pension fund that the federal government wrested away from corrupt trustees and organized crime after five years of legal battles.
A quarter-century later, the professionals who replaced themCentral States Pension Fund administrators; the Goldman Sachs & Co. and Northern Trust Global Advisors fiduciaries; and Department of Labor regulatorsstood watch while the financial markets accomplished what the mob had failed to: which was to smash the funds long-term solvency with massive money-losing investments.
And some people are complaining about lifting a chair.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)Ohioblue22
(1,430 posts)Didn't get it's way
Depaysement
(1,835 posts)Violence is behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something. That didn't even come close to happening in Nevada.
If you think that's violence, you have led a very sheltered life. You're lucky. I think it's a conveniently fabricated excuse to smear Bernie's supporters to "bring them to heel."
Ohioblue22
(1,430 posts)The dictionary is your friend.
What a ridiculous comment.
Ohioblue22
(1,430 posts)his supporters look bad. If this were story of a group of men yelling and trying to shame women going in to planned parenthood you most certainly refer to it as violent
zeemike
(18,998 posts)If so I can link you to lots of Youtube videos showing violence committed by women.
But I would guess your definition is selective...and depends on re defining the word violence.
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)Apples and oranges in your comparison.
I'm not saying yelling is right or good or appropriate. But you need to come up with a better example.
Ohioblue22
(1,430 posts)Don't deserve to be treated and threatened like they were
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Here, have some of this:
Ohioblue22
(1,430 posts)You can feel better and go back to sleep
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)People, especially if they've been in the public eye for decades, tend to develop a thick skin regarding rudeness, poor treatment, insults, etc. Private persons on a sidewalk don't have that advantage.
And I agree that no one deserves threats.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Ohioblue22
(1,430 posts)Parenthood got this treatment you wouldn't be surprised be so blase about it. You would call that violence. But it's coming from your side so you down play it
arcane1
(38,613 posts)How hard are you condemning Clinton supporters for literally beating a woman?
Break those Barriers!
Ohioblue22
(1,430 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)REP
(21,691 posts)I retired young due to disability, and had no faith my pension would exist in 27 years, when I would be 65 so I took an early buyout and invested the money (not that I think playing the market is a good alternative to pensions; it was a tiny windfall for me and my long-term holds are doing well - just luck and research).
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)That really sucks.
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)Many pension plans have been forced to reduce benefits and at the same time, increase contribution rates. They can thank Bush II for this situation. They are being hit by the same rules as the USPS was hit with, except the USPS was actually hit worse. They had to fund to near 100% of their future obligations through 2075. Other multi-employer plans had to hit 95% for the next ten years. This action has killed many multi-employer plans. The guarantee level was cut at the same time the new rules were put into place. Multi-employer plans also were usually defined benefit plans, not 401's or something like that. The retiree knew what they would get for so many years of service. It is apparent that the new rules were put there for one reason - to force all of that money directly into the stock market were it would be open to ups and down of the market without holding the benefits level for the participants.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)and fund it to the extent that those in multiemployer plans are treated the same as those in single employer plans. Probably costly, but if we can bail out Wall Street we should be able to do this.
Akicita
(1,196 posts)for a world of hurt. How about if all pension funds are required to bail out the tax payers for our $19T debt instead. That sounds just as fair doesn't it?
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)I knew about the USPS, of course, and the milking low of so many pension plans for profits and fees, but I confess whatever I may have read about multiemployer plans didn't hit home, certainly not that they hit them with USPS-type attacks. (Neither of us have pensions, so that topic is always about "others."
No wonder the conservatives are "restless" and anti-establishment fervor is high on both sides. I remember when conservatives just assumed they were on the same team with the 0.01% because they were all joined "together" to save America from our irresponsible and destructive policies. There was no telling them then, of course, and like so many here today most still prefer to lay all their problems at the Democrats' door, instead of their own.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)under-fund those pensions, and this allows people who didn't do the labor to steal the money from those who do.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)and raid it.
I took a buyout last year the minute they offered it before they could find a way to steal even more. As it was, I think it was about 40% smaller than it would have been. Thanks Carly.
Bonhomme Richard
(9,000 posts)fuck the average worker. That's just the way it is because we have the most ignorant voters in the world.
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)Should print money and bail out these pensioners. They lived up to their promise and to abandon them in their old age when they can't work is criminal.
allan01
(1,950 posts)and he advocated cutting ss ssi ssdi and all the other programs . i said , wait untill its ur turn when your bigshot pension goes belly up and he rolled his eyes . and it is your turn. now . i feel the folks who are left holding the bag.
Mopar151
(9,989 posts)Big scandal at the time, at least in the trucker magazines passed on from my Uncle. It's beyond bad when poor regulation and greedy bankers are WORSE than the Mob!
Mopar151
(9,989 posts)Peabody Energy is in the forefront, moving pension responsibility to subsidiaries (Patriot Coal, IIRC) which are already sinking, and ready to tank.
demosincebirth
(12,541 posts)400,000 well paying teamster jobs. Carter signed the bill.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Omaha Steve
(99,663 posts)K&R!
OS
WhiteTara
(29,718 posts)underpants
(182,834 posts)GREAT!!!!
WhiteTara
(29,718 posts)frankieallen
(583 posts)roamer65
(36,745 posts)Zero interest rate policy, btw.
Imagine what it will be like if we go to negative interest rate policy.
WhiteTara
(29,718 posts)that is for sure. For the borrowers, it will be welcome relief. Pretty scary, eh?
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)brooklynite
(94,603 posts)The article doesn't suggest WHY the fund is insolvent.