Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
Wed May 18, 2016, 12:05 PM May 2016

Naturopaths, Funded By Vitamin Companies, Seek Licensure, Reimbursement

https://www.statnews.com/2016/05/17/naturopaths-go-mainstream/

"Naturopaths, who practice an alternative medicine heavy on herbal supplements, are making a big push to gain more authority and stature across the United States, including the right to do more hands-on patient care and to be reimbursed by Medicare.

That’s raising concern among critics who see naturopaths as quacks — and who warn that offering them state licenses, insurance reimbursements, and other recognition only legitimizes their pseudoscience.

“You don’t want to regulate the snake-oil salesmen,” said Steven Salzberg, a computational biologist at Johns Hopkins who has been a vocal critic of naturopaths. “They don’t offer something that works to begin with.”

Naturopaths’ lobbying and public relations drives are funded in part by vitamin companies, which have a vested interest in seeing the profession expand, since many naturopaths promote dietary supplements, herbal remedies, and vitamin infusions for healing.

..."


--------------------------------------------

Further reading on this issue...

Nobody licenses quacks in my state! HB 4531 and the licensing of naturopaths in Michigan
https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/nobody-licenses-quacks-in-my-state-hb-4531-and-the-licensing-of-naturopaths-in-michigan/

-------------------------------------------

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Archae

(46,337 posts)
1. They are following in the footsteps of chiro-quacks...
Wed May 18, 2016, 12:08 PM
May 2016

Since they don't get anywhere in science medicine, they go the political route.

mackdaddy

(1,527 posts)
4. "Medical errors the third-leading cause of death in America"
Wed May 18, 2016, 12:44 PM
May 2016
Now comes a study in the current issue of the Journal of Patient Safety that says the numbers may be much higher — between 210,000 and 440,000 patients each year who go to the hospital for care suffer some type of preventable harm that contributes to their death.

That would make medical errors the third-leading cause of death in America, behind heart disease, which is the first, and cancer, which is second.


http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2013/09/20/224507654/how-many-die-from-medical-mistakes-in-u-s-hospitals


My MD came close to killing me putting me on two aspirin a day, and never giving me a simple red blood cell count test. Used to be that DO's were not accepted either. Maybe it would be better to make sure these people were licensed and responsible to a supervising board.

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
11. "some kind of preventable harm that contributes to their death"
Wed May 18, 2016, 03:15 PM
May 2016

Yeah, that probably happens a lot. I lost my mom to that a month ago, and it's not a mistake or a failure of real medicine.

It's not uncommon for sick people to have more than one system damaged, and treating one can risk the other. That's what happened with my mom: she had pneumonia, had to be ventilated, and the antibiotics to treat her lungs and the medication to treat her irregular heart beat caused by the lung problem caused her already diseased liver to fail. I was told that was a possibility, her doctors did their best to avoid it by giving her the lowest possible doses of the least damaging drugs that would do the job. But it happened.

And without that "preventable harm" she'd have drowned in her own fluids two weeks earlier.

Oneironaut

(5,505 posts)
8. If people like this get licenses, the licenses become pointless.
Wed May 18, 2016, 01:34 PM
May 2016

A lot of naturopath therapy is garbage based on garbage. They've gotten people killed in the past. Anything that is a pseudoscience does not deserve authority or legitimacy. People can use it if they want, but the state endorsing their pseudoscience is dangerous if not criminal.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
15. I can imagine how much this is driving you crazy
Mon May 23, 2016, 01:11 PM
May 2016

Having read a number of your posts over time.

I have friends who get into this alternative medical stuff. They spend a fortune on weird creams and supplements that are supposed to solve actual medical problems, and lo and behold they don't get any better. It's frustrating to watch. I try to find kind ways to say, "Just go to a doctor!!"

Johnny2X2X

(19,069 posts)
16. Double Blind and Peer Reviewed
Mon May 23, 2016, 01:22 PM
May 2016

If there isn't a legitimate peer review double blind study behind a medicine of any type it's not a legit form of medicine. And the peer review process that is accepted must be followed and the results must be certified.

Naturopaths have zero credibility in the scientific community. Homeopathy has zero effect (it's literally just water). And people would be surprised to learn that taking vitamins has no provable effect either.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Naturopaths, Funded By Vi...