Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums“The defendant is a serial child molester”
let this sink in:
The defendant is a serial child molester, said Judge Thomas M. Durkin, of Federal District Court, in a tough rebuke of the former speaker before issuing his sentence. He added, Nothing is more stunning than having serial child molester and Speaker of the House in the same sentence.
Pointing out the vulnerability of Mr. Hasterts young victims, he said they were damaged for years.
If theres a public shaming of the defendant because of the conduct hes engaged in, so be it, Judge Durkin said.
more:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/28/us/dennis-hastert-sentencing.html?_r=0
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-dennis-hastert-individual-d-met-20160427-story.html
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-dennis-hastert-lawmaker-record-met-20160413-story.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 787 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
“The defendant is a serial child molester” (Original Post)
kpete
Apr 2016
OP
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)1. He should have recieved 15-150 yrs.
Fucker.
trueblue2007
(17,228 posts)3. He should have recieved 30 years
rocktivity
(44,576 posts)2. Too bad public shaming is what we have to settle for.
On the other hand, fear of public shaming is the reason why Hastert DIDN'T tell the FBI that he was doing weird things with his bank withdrawals because he was being blackmailed. And of course the idea of a blackmailable Speaker of the House -- second in line to the president -- is equally stunning.
When you have to choose between bad and worse, always choose bad.
rocknation
mulsh
(2,959 posts)4. I wonder if they'll let him keep that prop, um, I mean wheel chair, in the pokey.
As you can tell I have no sympathy for this particular convict.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)5. Then why the hell
did you only give him 15 months? Hell, he'll probably be out in 9. Oh, that's right- he's an old, rich, white guy. I am shocked he is going at all.