Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Baitball Blogger

(46,737 posts)
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 07:18 PM Jun 2012

Orange voters react angrily to request for new signatures (FL)



Some voters are showing signs of getting fed up with efforts to question their right to vote in Florida, reacting angrily to 214,000 letters sent by Supervisor of Elections Bill Cowles this week to longtime and absentee voters in Orange County.

Cowles is asking them to submit fresh voter signatures so that there will be no confusion when his office checks signatures on absentee ballots this year. In the Republican presidential primary on Jan. 31, Cowles said, his office rejected 119 absentee ballots because the signature on the ballot didn't adequately match the one they had on file.

But voters such as Mattie White, 73, of Orlando, saw the letter as an attack on her legitimacy.

"This is just ridiculous to me. I've been here for 44 years," said White, who said she votes so regularly that election officials in her precinct greet her by name. "They want me to prove to them who I am."

http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2012-06-06/news/os-voter-signature-demand-20120606_1_absentee-ballots-absentee-voters-voter-registration-drives
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Orange voters react angrily to request for new signatures (FL) (Original Post) Baitball Blogger Jun 2012 OP
and that siganture matching is done by teh Dibeold machine, of course. the one with high, medium and robinlynne Jun 2012 #1
Well, sending 200,000 letters make more sense. Ohio Dem Jun 2012 #2
I think you missed something, or misread the OP. robinlynne Jun 2012 #5
The only thing I missed was thinking Ohio Dem Jun 2012 #6
oooooooooooooh. robinlynne Jun 2012 #7
Sorry if that came across as snarky. Ohio Dem Jun 2012 #8
we're good. just feeling stupid.... robinlynne Jun 2012 #9
Voted in NY for almost 40 years HockeyMom Jun 2012 #3
Unfortunately, vote by mail signatures are not checked at the polls by the people you know. they are robinlynne Jun 2012 #4

robinlynne

(15,481 posts)
1. and that siganture matching is done by teh Dibeold machine, of course. the one with high, medium and
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 07:20 PM
Jun 2012

low settings?

So 119 people's sig maybe did not match. therefore let's disenfranchise 200,000 people. oh yes.

Ohio Dem

(4,357 posts)
2. Well, sending 200,000 letters make more sense.
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 07:47 PM
Jun 2012

Instead of just sending 119 letters to the folks whose signatures didn't match.

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
3. Voted in NY for almost 40 years
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 07:49 PM
Jun 2012

Yes, they matched signatures, but they got to know me by sight. They KNEW who I was over decades so the signature was just a formality.

robinlynne

(15,481 posts)
4. Unfortunately, vote by mail signatures are not checked at the polls by the people you know. they are
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 11:44 PM
Jun 2012

checked at the Registrar's office by computers running software owned by private corporations. ES&S in most cases, who purchased 'Diebold". I think California is at 40% vote by mail now, something like that.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Orange voters react angri...