General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA Member of Congress Just Issued a Warning to the World Bank: 'Stop Privatizing Water'
Rep. Gwen Moore's actions could mean the beginning of the end of the World Banks harmful water-for-profit pursuits.
By Jesse Bragg
http://www.alternet.org/water/member-congress-just-issued-warning-world-bank-stop-privatizing-water
Around the globe, peoples access to water is being threatened every day by one of the most powerful institutions on the globethe World Bank. Under the guise of development, the World Bank and its investment arm, the International Finance Corporation, invest hundreds of millions in water privatization schemes that reduce access to water, increase costs and have a devastating impact on people. Whats worse is that the IFC often positions itself to profit from these projects, creating an irreconcilable conflict of interest.
But one congresswoman just took a stand against this threat that could mean the beginning of the end of the World Banks harmful water-for-profit pursuits. In a letter, Representative Gwen Moore (D-WI) demanded the World Bank cease all promotion and financing of these projects pending an external review and congressional hearings on conflicts of interest. Decause Moore is the ranking member of a subcommittee with direct World Bank oversight, it has no choice but to listen.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Glad that somebody is standing up to the Neoliberal rush to kill the commons and put everything of value into private for profit hands.
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)where are the rest of the Congress critters?
They want us dead
KansDem
(28,498 posts)Only after they've extracted our last dollar...
Turbineguy
(37,343 posts)it's just that it's the only thing they are capable of doing.
malaise
(269,054 posts)They don't understand that without us there is no them.
Turbineguy
(37,343 posts)everybody could see where things were going and had a pretty shrewd idea of the effect, yet they did not stop it. And when it was over they set the stage for World War II.
malaise
(269,054 posts)who died - war and plunder = wealth for the few
alfredo
(60,074 posts)They want more
malaise
(269,054 posts)they would
That Pie video was perfect and it did not apply to Britain alone.
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)malaise
(269,054 posts)Killing us!!!
cui bono
(19,926 posts)They'll start with ginormous ones that we will all buy since we need to breathe. Then they'll introduce smaller, lighter versions which we'll all buy because we need to get around while we're breathing. Then even smaller, lighter and they'll introduce a usb charger in them. Then they'll keep making them more and more compact with more and more extra features on them until they figure out the next thing they can charge us for and make devices we will need in order to use this next thing.
.
C Moon
(12,213 posts)alfredo
(60,074 posts)malaise
(269,054 posts)alfredo
(60,074 posts)hatrack
(59,587 posts)Still the best single quote I can think of regarding the First World War.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Capitalism is all about gaining wealth. Those that seek wealth don't actually want us to die, but we have resources they want and if we die as a result of them stealing it, it's not personal, it's just business.
What is sad is that those that support Clinton, the conservative wing of our party are willing to ignore the suffering of many in the 99% to support the widening of the wealth gap. Clinton has made no indication that she will work to stop the ever widening wealth gap that has made her superwealthy.
malaise
(269,054 posts)Ignoring is one thing - pretending not to ignore is worse
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)malaise
(269,054 posts)So they're in it for themselves while trying to con the rest of humanity into believing that they give a flying fugg.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)labeled economic disaster (for the 99%) with same sex marriage as the bait. Social justice is worthless if we all end up living in the streets. People should look to Haiti and see what happens when capitalism is done. See if the people there care about social justice issues.
ReasonableToo
(505 posts)whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)appalachiablue
(41,146 posts)Initech
(100,081 posts)CrispyQ
(36,478 posts)Do they even teach about it in school anymore? We got it in fifth grade civics class. An entire year of civics, imagine that.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)I'm 62. I never heard of "the commons" until the last couple years when The Archdruid introduced the concept in his writings. And I went to a "good" public school.
JEB
(4,748 posts)The practice of the World Bank both advising countries on water and investing in private water companies presents a concerning conflict of interest, said Rep. Gwen Moore, D-Wisc., in a letter addressed to World Bank head Jim Kim. In it, Moore urges the Bank to immediately cease promoting privatization of water resources until there has been a robust outside evaluation.
I am increasingly uneasy with water resource privatization in developing countries and do not believe that the current ring-fencing policies separating the investment and advising functions of the [International Finance Corporation] are adequate, she writes. I would respectfully urge the WBG and IFC to cease promoting and funding privatization of water resources, including so-called public-private partnerships in the water sector, until there has been a robust outside evaluation.
mrmpa
(4,033 posts)Nestles. The CEO a couple of years back stated that people do not have a right to water. Saying I don't have a right to water, is like saying I don't have the right to live. Reason it equates, is because I cannot live without water.
http://www.trueactivist.com/nestle-ceo-water-is-not-a-human-right-should-be-privatized/
JEB
(4,748 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)The CEO is evil. How evil? Just as evil as Adolph Hitler IMO.
arikara
(5,562 posts)That they get for nothing from OUR aquifers.
CrispyQ
(36,478 posts)Selling off our Commons so private companies can profit from them.
We don't have a democracy.
We have an auction.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Or else!
[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)chapdrum
(930 posts)Imo, this (and climate change) are the two top issues facing humanity.
Water as private property?
That's carrying free market hooey just a tad too far.
Am going to Rep. Moore's site right now, to thank her.
JEB
(4,748 posts)Response to chapdrum (Reply #16)
cyberpj This message was self-deleted by its author.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)maggies farm
(79 posts)Last edited Sun Apr 24, 2016, 03:25 PM - Edit history (1)
For the last 15 years I have worked in one of the wealthiest zip codes in the nation. I provide computer services. In Montecito California there are a lot of small home offices. I will not name drop but you would clearly recognize some of the clients I have had over the years if I were to disclose.
I have a story that I am going to greatly truncate.
Several years back it came to my attention that some land was about to enter the market. It has a set of mineral hot springs. It produces about 50 million gallons a year on the front range of the San Ysidro Mountains and within 6 miles of the city of Santa Barbara.
Santa Barbara and the Channel Islands has a very long history with the Chumash people dating back over 10,000 years. The Spanish Mission era started at around 1769 when the path to the springs were first noted by Europeans. It is at the point of a young state of California that the present history of the springs took a sharp departure. These springs used for upwards of 10,000 years were shared with a white dying man that likely had heavy metal poisoning from quicksilver (mercury) mining over the mountain. (Mineral thermal water are known for chelating heavy metal toxins.) The man healed and promptly filed a land patent on the springs starting the history of coming to Santa Barbara to take advantage of the clime and it's mineral waters in the area.
Mineral waters throughout the US were respected and revered much like the Roman baths but it reached a peak in America and with the beginning of medical colleges and patented medicines those waters as therapy went into decline. There were a series of hotels from the 1860's all the way to the 1964 Coyote Fire.
In 1897 a set of water rights were wrangled at the springs for the downstream estates in Montecito. In that elaborate set of water rights 50% of the water went to a private water company and the other 50% remained with the land owner to be used for the various soaks and plunges.
When the land came for sale a local land trust organization spearheaded the effort to acquire the land and springs. I learned such an organization is not an environmental or conservation organization but a 'fixer' of properties that have various constraints and might not be fully developable. The outcome might provide some form of tax remedy and might include conservation easements or open spaces. In this case it was to be an outright conveyance to the USFS which has surrounding land.
What I discovered in the end was this. The idea was to convey the land and springs to the USFS, but forever remove water so that the public would not be able to soak in the springs! The USFS is notorious for poorly managing hot springs. To them it often is little more than an attractant nuisance, and with increasing budget constraints they cannot manage resources like springs.
My client at the time was the last house of one side of Hot Spring creek, told me when I knew what the endgame would be said, "don't worry all of the donors are democratics", the primary donor that put up 6 million dollars for the purchase lives across the creek and last house before entering into the chaparral forest leading up to the springs a mile away told me by direct conversation, "I considered buying the land for myself and bulldozing and capping the springs so no one would ever be able to soak in those waters again!" A classic case of NIMBY and wealth.
Today the USFS now owns the land, and it also now controls 50% of the water and that 50% is provided as permissive use at no cost to a private water company to feed estates that rival many municipal parks found throughout the U.S. We are talking about 25 million gallons of water a year given freely by our government - that is your water to the detriment of an effectively dewaterd creek with endangered steelhead downstream along with the needs of the flora and fauna found within the watershed itself. To soak in waters that were used for therapeutic and the lesser recreational purposes of relaxation for over 10,000 years are no longer available to the public on public lands and is an actual crime to enter those waters.
I must say I have seen the impacts and greed of wealth and particularly democratic wealth first hand. The fella that put up the 6 million dollars is a heavy democratic funder.
You can dig deeply through this facebook page Montecito Hot Springs and get a good idea what we are really faced with regarding the collusion of government with the lofty one percenters (democratic and republican). Here is an example of one of the estates receiving OUR water that is considered as non-potable irrigating water. These springs make this estate possible!
Response to maggies farm (Reply #21)
FreedomRain This message was self-deleted by its author.
arikara
(5,562 posts)Each takes a turn at the same trough. Anyone who can't see that they aren't run by the same 1%ers is blind or stupid.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)Bwahahaha! if only it were not so damn tragic.
the Republicans - at least the rank and file - have a better history of caring about water than the Democrats in California.
Although "D" Governor Davis gave up his political career to protect the integrity of our water. (And Senator Di Feinstein stood by "idly" while Davis was removed. Because she was allied with the same Big Oil forces that took out Davis.)
pansypoo53219
(20,981 posts)felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)WHEN CRABS ROAR
(3,813 posts)and has been for millions of years.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)
.(wish I could remember her/his name) made the point that the Iraq War was how we privatized that country. Really important way to put it. That's exactly what happened.
Don't forget that water in Flint has been privatized too. By making the local water undrinkable, the contract to supply water (bottled) has gone to Nestles.
Racism mixed with private profit.
DhhD
(4,695 posts)The 1998 FAIR Legislation, allowed the privatization of everything that government could not stop. It is a part of US and Global Corporate Fascism. Republicans call it the New World Order.
During the Clinton Presidency, Iraq had one after another inspectors and fly-overs for a decade. Nothing, no WMD were found then and during the Bush Administration. Bush even admitted that there were not any WMD in a speech.
Then in 2002-03, Hillary voted to allow Bush to privatize Iraq through warfare. Remember that Iraq had noting to do with 9/11. Saddam allowed no al-Qaeda terrorist in Iraq. The US came in shooting up and bombing the city of Baghdad killing so many people, in March of 2003, saying that the Iraqis would pay us back in oil for their new liberty: Operation Iraqi Liberty-OIL.
What other countries have been privatized by the United States since 9/11 and by whom?
Bill and Hill are Neo-liberal poster children.
One of the things in the missing HRC emails is correspondence with France about re-asserting France's colonial hold over Syria and the whole area. And another word for colonialization is privatization. So we are having a hand in that mess.
I think Haiti, since the hurricane, is an example of this too. "Aid" including the Clinton Foundation "aid" has left most of the country in shambles but the beach has been privatized into luxury hotel complexes.
Puerto Rico is and isn't a countryI think it wanted statehood and don't know why it's not granted. But it's being forced to accept extreme austerity. So I suspect great selling off of public assets is going on.
Meantime, Social Security, Public Schooling, the Post Office are all in danger of privatization here at home. And----our War Contractors world-wide privatize the army as well as the country invaded. All on the taxpayers back.
And our insurance delivered health benefits essentially privatize health care.
Then there's all the public lands we let private industry drill on and log.
Oh!And there's the public airwaves that have in fact been privatized for profit.
Prisons are more and more privatized.
The power to count the vote in elections is privatized.
There's this larger and larger monster in the world.
Optimism
(142 posts)Sad... but so true. Enough is enough.
cprise
(8,445 posts)It was the Clintons who first gave the neocon conspiracy theories credibility in Washington -- See the 1998 Iraqi Liberation Act. The scandals probably stopped this from becoming a war then.
Five years later Hillary was voting for the war.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)
.know that. Thanks. Will look into it further.
No wonder George Senior calls Bill his other son.
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)but in truth they are wholly owned by corporations and do not function for people, jsut corporations.
they drive countries into total failure in ther "helpful ways" it is time to rethink these organizations and either close them down or restructure them. Have they ever done anything that was wholly good or even partially good?
DhhD
(4,695 posts)Sienna86
(2,149 posts)Water should not be privatized.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)Funders of genocide. Extinctors of species. Evil, pure evil.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)I had hope...it is dying slowly and steadly...
Dolphins dying, selling water to people - when water is a basic need - working like a servant 20 hours overtime a week because corporations are big asses and won't hire more workers....
Hopeless...the planet is dying and we are more concerned with the death of Prince.
RIP Planet Earth
JEB
(4,748 posts)As much water trickles down as money gushes up.
IthinkThereforeIAM
(3,076 posts)... were big at robbing Argentina of their new water facilities for pennies on the dollar. Enron used Dumya as a reference...
Concise explanation, I have researched this in the past: http://www.hermes-press.com/enronindex.htm
senz
(11,945 posts)Water privatization is an obscene concept. It should be against the law.
Uncle Joe
(58,366 posts)Thanks for the thread, JEB.
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)the commons"....
It's so needed right here....