Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Association Between Income and Life Expectancy in the United States, 2001-2014
http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=2513561We really don't need to read this lengthy study from Standford, MIT and Harvard depts. of economics, and the office of tax analysis from the US Treasury dept. to instinctively know this.
Conclusions and Relevance: In the United States between 2001 and 2014, higher income was associated with greater longevity, and differences in life expectancy across income groups increased over time. However, the association between life expectancy and income varied substantially across areas; differences in longevity across income groups decreased in some areas and increased in others. The differences in life expectancy were correlated with health behaviors and local area characteristics.
====
I found this paragraph of interest:
The strongest pattern in the data was that low-income individuals tend to live longest (and have more healthful behaviors) in cities with highly educated populations, high incomes, and high levels of government expenditures, such as New York, New York, and San Francisco, California. In these cities, life expectancy for individuals in the bottom 5% of the income distribution was approximately 80 years. In contrast, in cities such as Gary, Indiana, and Detroit, Michigan, the expected age at death for individuals in the bottom 5% of the income distribution was approximately 75 years. Low-income individuals living in cities with highly educated populations and high incomes also experienced the largest gains in life expectancy during the 2000s.
And... of course, high tax. For those of us who do live in high tax states, the reward is for life.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 589 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Association Between Income and Life Expectancy in the United States, 2001-2014 (Original Post)
question everything
Apr 2016
OP
Roughly speaking, the difference between 5 and 95 income percentile equals 10 years of life. nt
thereismore
Apr 2016
#1
If you are at the top end, you can get one of those "caretakers" to push your wheelchair...
Human101948
Apr 2016
#2
thereismore
(13,326 posts)1. Roughly speaking, the difference between 5 and 95 income percentile equals 10 years of life. nt
Human101948
(3,457 posts)2. If you are at the top end, you can get one of those "caretakers" to push your wheelchair...
and spoon feed you. If you are on the bottom end you are on your own.