Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
3. I think that's the plan.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 11:06 AM
Apr 2016

It would be vengeful, even crazier than most of what they do, and completely hypocritical. Perfect!

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
5. Yep- they will see it as making the best of what they have
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 11:16 AM
Apr 2016

I am sure that's exactly what they have in mind. If they win, they get their guy. If they lose they go ahead and put him in.

That makes the obstructionist shit a no-lose proposition for them.

Obama should announce he will withdraw his nomination the day before the election if he hasn't been confirmed by then. That's a no-lose move for us, because that means if we win a better nomination gets made and if we lose there wasn't going to be anyone we wanted in there anyway.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
6. They may not even wait for that.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 11:31 AM
Apr 2016

If the polls make it obvious that they are going to lose they will probably confirm him.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
10. I've wondered about that. If not confirmed by fall,
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 11:54 AM
Apr 2016

the president should have a good discussion with our nominee about this, but it's Obama's call while he is president. If the Democrat wins, and especially if we get a majority in the Senate, the next 2 or 3 justices will most likely be appointed by that Democrat. I think the court would be just fine with a Merrick Garland on it.

And if the GOP nominee (Paul Ryan?) wins, we either be very thankful that Garland was confirmed or sick that he was not.

All the names being pushed by the right are unbelievably hard core and believe almost all progressive governmental actions are unconstitutional: Including Social Security, child labor laws, compulsory education, various taxes, Medicare, federal disaster relief, and many others.

They also believe in a very stratified society with power and wealth concentrated in the upper classes, who are naturally overall wiser and more responsible or they wouldn't be where they are. They also have more to lose and therefore are more invested in a stable society. Or something like that.

NV Whino

(20,886 posts)
4. If Hillary wins the nomination will stand
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 11:14 AM
Apr 2016

If Bernie wins, I think we can look for a more liberal nominee. Everything, of course, depends on the make up of the Senate.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
11. Can "we the people" push Obama for another nominee, since they're dragging feet?
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 12:07 PM
Apr 2016

And, if so, do you have a suggestion at this point?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I hope I never see Justic...