Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

uponit7771

(90,347 posts) Wed Jun 6, 2012, 10:14 AM Jun 2012

Scott Walker had what? 6 months to define himself? Dems had 2....that's a big difference

...in time and money.

Walker spent 30 million
Barret spent 4 million

Come on people, please keep things in perspective....

Thx

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Scott Walker had what? 6 months to define himself? Dems had 2....that's a big difference (Original Post) uponit7771 Jun 2012 OP

money. mid-west is fair play, and so do-overs not fair. pansypoo53219 Jun 2012 #1

Democrats had 6 months to define Walker Freddie Stubbs Jun 2012 #2

pansypoo53219

(20,981 posts)

1. money. mid-west is fair play, and so do-overs not fair.

Reply to uponit7771 (Original post)

Wed Jun 6, 2012, 11:48 AM

Jun 2012

and money. but he lost the majority. so he is neutered, hell, some moderate pubs are pealing off. and i bet some are willing to let the law remove him.

Freddie Stubbs

(29,853 posts)

2. Democrats had 6 months to define Walker

Reply to uponit7771 (Original post)

Wed Jun 6, 2012, 11:50 AM

Jun 2012

This election wasn't about Barrett. It was about Walker.

Reply to this discussion