Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

1-Old-Man

(2,667 posts)
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 10:09 AM Jun 2012

Quit being such pessimists, there is a winning lesson for us from Wisconsin

There is a lesson to be learned by us Democrats from the Wisconsin vote, and it is not that money will win out in the end. No, the lesson is quite the opposite actually. No pit is bottomless, nothing lasts forever. We can force them to spend themselves out of existence. The amount of money raised to defend the indefensible, to keep Scott Walker in office in one state can not be repeated in 50 states, and boots on the ground forces them to spend enormous amounts of money. If organization alone forced the Republicans to outspend Democrats 7:1 then we can force them to do it everywhere. We lost a battle, not a war, and the enemy has shown us the chink in its armor; that armor is incredibly expensive to maintain.

Edited to repair typo.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Quit being such pessimists, there is a winning lesson for us from Wisconsin (Original Post) 1-Old-Man Jun 2012 OP
I have a big take away from last night GarroHorus Jun 2012 #1
2 trillion. Can we make them spend it? lonestarnot Jun 2012 #2
Every door we knock on cost them $50~$100 in TV time to counteract. 1-Old-Man Jun 2012 #3
Yes! lonestarnot Jun 2012 #5
and the 27,000 calls made in one evening, how much for them? lonestarnot Jun 2012 #8
Excellent point and thanks for posting. emulatorloo Jun 2012 #4
How would we force them to spend down to broke/unable to influence? TheKentuckian Jun 2012 #6
Well, when they spend it the no longer have it. lonestarnot Jun 2012 #7
Too bad extreme wealth is quite renewable and they don't need to spend everywhere or forever TheKentuckian Jun 2012 #9
 

GarroHorus

(1,055 posts)
1. I have a big take away from last night
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 10:11 AM
Jun 2012

Basically, the billionaires have to spend almost 10 to 1 in order to guarantee a victory in any election.

$10 billion in the presidential race is going to be hard to come by.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
6. How would we force them to spend down to broke/unable to influence?
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 11:42 AM
Jun 2012

I don't see how the numbers support such a strategy when we are outmatched on bot accumulated wealth and income.

The top 400 outmatch the bottom 40% on income and easily on wealth and the bottom 40% need about every cent to live.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
9. Too bad extreme wealth is quite renewable and they don't need to spend everywhere or forever
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 09:23 PM
Jun 2012

Two or three cycles properly placed is about all it would take.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Quit being such pessimist...