Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEveryone wins! Well, not you.
We have entered another phase of journalists, raised in affluence and currently enjoying at least middle class incomes who are thus, according to their own moral calculus, very economically privileged telling Americans devastated by the collapse of the uneducated labor market that their poverty, marginalization, and hopelessness is Actually Good, because people in Bangladesh can now move from absolutely abject poverty to slightly-less-abject poverty. Provided the sweatshop where they work doesnt collapse on them. And provided they are willing to endure a nightmare of nonexistent labor power, terrible health and safety standards, total impunity from their bosses, and for the women, an atmosphere of near-constant sexual threat and exploitation.But suppose youre a journo, writer, or academic who really does think that outsourcing is the only way to help the worlds poorest. Isnt your own moral path then clear? Shouldnt you be outsourcing your own job to people from the poorest parts of the earth? There are many talented and ambitious writers and scholars in China, India, Pakistan, Nigeria . If you make, say, $80K a year as a pundit, isnt your moral duty to work with your employee to outsource your work to a poorer country? Punditry, after all, is very easy to conduct via telecommunications, unlike being a waiter, an orchard worker, or a yoga instructor. And isnt it very possible that you could get at least a large majority of the value of your work from a team of people in India at a fraction of the cost, while providing all of them with wages far higher than the median income of their home country? You could have your employer pay five Indian writers $10K/year to replicate what you provide for the company. The Indian writers would make better than six times the Indian median annual income. And your employer gets to pocket that extra $30K which, after all, is why outsourcing actually exists, to improve the profits of our corporate overlords. Everyone wins! Well, not you. But this is precisely the bargain that you think Americas uneducated labor force should make. It is, in fact, a condition that you have loudly argued is morally necessary.
http://fredrikdeboer.com/2016/04/06/outsource-brad-delong/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 584 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Everyone wins! Well, not you. (Original Post)
kpete
Apr 2016
OP
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)1. This is a common silencing tactic by the Globalization propagandanists.
Imply criticism of Globalization and "Free Trade" makes you a racist xenophobic bigot, making people on the left afraid of speaking out against it because they do not want to look racist. The unfortunate consequence is that only the actual racists, like the Far Right parties in Europe and the Trump supporters here in the US, feel free to publically oppose the Globalists, and this is a big source of their popularity.