Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,572 posts)
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 07:26 AM Apr 2016

Joe Sestak's last stand against the Democratic Party

DREXEL HILL, Pa. — There’s no ideological civil war underway here. No, this is all personal — just former Navy Adm. Joe Sestak making his last stand against Democratic Party leaders who’ve been trying to sink him for six years and counting.

On paper, Sestak is about everything Democrats could want in a Senate candidate: a charismatic, decorated veteran elected to the House from a swing district who nearly defeated Republican Pat Toomey in 2010, one of the toughest election years for Democrats in decades.

But the independent streak that attracts voters is precisely what worries national Democrats so much about Sestak: They believe, for the second time since 2010, that he could blow a winnable Senate race because of his tendency to reject the slightest hint of marching orders from party bosses. Sestak is the first to admit he likes doing things his way, and party leaders quickly tired of constantly being told, in so many words, to take a hike.

In response, the whole D.C. Democratic gang is all-in for Sestak’s main Democratic rival, Katie McGinty — from Barack Obama and Joe Biden to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and Sen. Bob Casey (D-Pa.). More than that, the national party is dropping more than $1 million to push McGinty past Sestak — a rare move by Democrats in a Senate primary that reflects their level of disdain for him.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/sestak-pa-primary-221644

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

brooklynite

(94,572 posts)
2. Reminds me of how a certain presidential candidate signed an agreement...
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 08:48 AM
Apr 2016

...to raise funds for the Party, and then couldn't be bothered

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
4. Why should he help a party establishment out to destroy him and all other Progressive candidates?
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 09:10 AM
Apr 2016

Even if he can get none of his agenda through, as President he will still be able to purge Payday Loan Debbie and all the other Third Wayers from the party.

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
6. Because he didn't want to be Nader.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 09:23 AM
Apr 2016

Running as an independent would be worse than useless because he would just be a spoiler, this way he is taking over the party from the inside.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
9. Reminds me of some people
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 10:58 AM
Apr 2016

Who can't help themselves and get off topic because they're so convinced of their own superior thinking.

malthaussen

(17,195 posts)
3. I'd take Fetterman over both of them.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 09:09 AM
Apr 2016

The machine has its priorities, even if that machine ranks right up there with Tinker Toy as a result.

-- Mal

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Joe Sestak's last stand a...