General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObama Kills Largest Corporate Attempt Yet To Flee Overseas And Dodge Taxes
Obama Kills Largest Corporate Attempt Yet To Flee Overseas And Dodge Taxes
by Alan Pyke Apr 6, 2016 11:33 am
snip//
Founded in Brooklyn in 1849, Pfizer is one of the longest-running corporate success stories in the American economy. It has benefited from U.S. taxpayers investments in roads, education, scientific research, and global stability for almost 160 years, growing from $2,500 in seed money from Charles Pfizers father into the top-selling drugmaker in the world.
But for the past several years, Pfizers executives have tried desperately to move away. The company sought whats called an inversion merger, in which two corporations combine and use accounting schemes to shift almost all of their profits into a country with low tax rates.
Pfizer tried to buy British drug titan AstraZeneca in 2014, hoping to slice a billion dollars per year off its U.S. tax bill. But it wouldnt meet AstraZenecas asking price, and the would-be inversion fell apart.
A year and a half later, Pfizer and Allergan announced the largest inversion deal in history. The merger didnt have the same flashy annual tax savings as the failed AstraZeneca bid would have delivered, but it would have allowed Pfizer to permanently avoid U.S. taxes on huge cash reserves it currently holds offshore.
But the Pfizer-Allergan announcement came after inversions had become a hot topic in the political press rather than just the financial pages. A series of high-profile corporate expatriations to duck American taxes had prompted a populist backlash, and the White House had begun explicitly shaming inverters as unpatriotic.
To put force to those words, the Obama administration began taking a series of independent steps to discourage inversions. The highly technical steps chipped away at the financial incentives that lead companies to invert in the first place.
The most recent of those came this week, leading Pfizer to abandon its latest inversion. The government didnt act to block the merger, but rather to negate the tax benefits that were Pfizers primary reason for trying to shift its official headquarters abroad while continuing to operate in the United States.
more...
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2016/04/06/3767056/pfizer-pays-150-million-escape-merger/
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)cprise
(8,445 posts)the US itself is becoming the world's largest tax evasion haven on his watch.
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)malaise
(269,157 posts)GObama!
Qutzupalotl
(14,327 posts)Unpatriotic ingrates.
ozone_man
(4,825 posts)Let Bernie do a clean sweep. The U.S. is becoming the largest tax haven, and under Obama's watch. One can only imagine what tax havens would appear with Clintons.
saturnsring
(1,832 posts)Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)pampango
(24,692 posts)stupidicus
(2,570 posts)and wholly in capable of defending against the gross hypocrisy charge.
The ONLY thing most of them appear to be good at is changing the subject...
U.S.
The United States is more of a cause for concern than any other individual country, according to the Financial Secrecy Index, because of both the size of its offshore sector, and also its rather wayward attitude to international cooperation and reform.
The U.S. provides a wide array of secrecy and tax-free facilities for non-residents, both at a federal level and at the level of individual states.
Though the U.S. has been a pioneer in defending itself from foreign secrecy jurisdictions, aggressively taking on the Swiss banking establishment and setting up its technically quite strong Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), it provides little information in return to other countries, making it a formidable, harmful and irresponsible secrecy jurisdiction at both the federal and state levels. http://www.newsweek.com/panama-papers-top-ten-tax-havens-where-money-hidden-444512
NCjack
(10,279 posts)political heat being applied by Bernie to the 3rd-way Democrats.
beastie boy
(9,421 posts)Just like the labels the right wing tried to pin on him, the left wing labels are just flying off of Obama.
FighttheFuture
(1,313 posts)Unless you are a third-way neo-liberal.
beastie boy
(9,421 posts)Or, if you wish, you may choose any other label that signifies a good guy in your dog whistle call book.
whathehell
(29,090 posts)add one more -- His total failure to support unions during his tenure -- No 'card check', no support when Wisconsin
rose up against Scott Walker's attempted union massacre.
beastie boy
(9,421 posts)credit for one.
Not that there aren't more than one... Lily Ledbetter, government takeover of GM, extension of unemployment benefits, Obamacare...
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)and Obamacare is a Republican-designed program which is why 1) it is complex and clunky; 2) it has lame/no cost controls or public option; and 3) it is difficult for Democrats to like or defend. Other two actions were good of course but imo don't outweigh other actions and inactions. On balance I would say that certainly Obama is better than any Republican, and worse than Bernie would be. If you need to change the course of a nation, tweaking the existing system (i.e. propping up the status quo) is not sufficient.
whathehell
(29,090 posts)I just wish he had pushed back more against corporatism.
FighttheFuture
(1,313 posts)You can look at your fantasies, I look at his actions. They are very pro-corporate, often at the expense of the people of this country.
I can give him credit for this but I cannot say I understand why he is doing it. Perhaps he's trying to stave off another economic collapse, of which things like this will bring us closer to it. Maybe he's trying to keep some more competition (such as it is) int he market place, which will only hep the ACA. There can be a number of reasons, but I do not think they are because he's some liberal beacon, A "Roosevelt" in disuse. That's your delusion.
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)tblue37
(65,487 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)marble falls
(57,204 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Pfizer, one of our leading pharmaceutical industries, who wants to reduce taxes on their profits.
Pfizer makes 39.2 billlion according to wikivest. I think it's OK to tax them.
Hekate
(90,793 posts)AgadorSparticus
(7,963 posts)lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)suffragette
(12,232 posts)Proving it CAN be done when there is the will to do it.
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)Encouraged but tempered. We've been clamouring about offshore tax havens for years. But they're so 2000s. Let's see what he does about everyone's new fav, onshore tax havens.
The Worlds Favorite New Tax Haven Is the United States
Last September, at a law firm overlooking San Francisco Bay, Andrew Penney, a managing director at Rothschild & Co., gave a talk on how the worlds wealthy elite can avoid paying taxes.
His message was clear: You can help your clients move their fortunes to the United States, free of taxes and hidden from their governments.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-27/the-world-s-favorite-new-tax-haven-is-the-united-states]
seabeckind
(1,957 posts)Student debt issue -- http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141412256
Quietly taking decisive action to cut banking down to size -- http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027745608
Kills Largest Corporate Attempt Yet To Flee Overseas And Dodge Taxes -- http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027743166
It's almost like he's finally recognized some of the issues that people have been talking about.
At a time when his friend is coming under fire for these very issues.