Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
1. I've gotta admit, I'm kind of geeking out over the thought of native Bash under Windows.
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 04:24 PM
Apr 2016

I've always thought that Microsoft made a huge mistake with Powershell. Why try to reinvent the wheel when there are fully developed, GPL & MIT licensed shell environments available that can do the same thing?

By building Bash into Windows, Microsoft has just created a situation where a single skillset can be used to manage Linux, OSX and Windows systems. That's freaking HUGE.

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
2. I think it was a very smart move
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 04:29 PM
Apr 2016

It would be really wise of MS to build their own version of Linux, and then release it under GPL. They could charge for the newest version and then post the other versions for free. I would pay for a very highly polished version, but I know I'm in the minority on that.

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
4. People have been saying that for 15 years now
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 04:40 PM
Apr 2016

If Microsoft were smart, they'd convert Windows into a desktop environment running on a modified, Win32 binary compatible Linux kernel. That would allow them to keep the look and feel of the current Windows environment while fixing many of the security issues they currently face. It would also allow developers to develop true "Write Once, Run Anywhere" applications.

I don't see it happening, but it's a nice thought.

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
6. My guess is they don't want to do that, fearing cannabalization of their Windows-based businesses
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 05:20 PM
Apr 2016

People would just wait and get the free ones. The kernel idea is a good one.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
10. We've been able to run a UNIX shell in Windows since NT.
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 07:32 PM
Apr 2016

I don't know why they won't take the next step and move on over to Linux.

PersonNumber503602

(1,134 posts)
9. I recently learned that MS now has an MCSA certification for Linux on Azure.
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 07:32 PM
Apr 2016

It requires the person to have their LFCS and to pass an exam that covers implementing linux in Azure. So maybe some day we will need an MS distro of linux. I don't know how well received it would be, but it would be interesting.

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
5. PowerShell is better than Windows GUI or DOS...
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 04:47 PM
Apr 2016

...but it's no BASH. The recent addition of SSH to PS really helped its case, but it really says something when Powershell is still playing catch-up nine years after its initial release.

That said, there are certainly some features that could go the other way. I'd love to have object oriented shell commands in Bash.

PersonNumber503602

(1,134 posts)
7. I usually always have cygwin installed on my windows installs
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 07:25 PM
Apr 2016

This is a nice to know though. I gotta play around with it at some point.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Run native Bash on Ubuntu...