General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDick Cheney Should, And Will, Be Prosecuted As War Criminal: Retired International Court Judge
http://samuel-warde.com/2016/04/dick-cheney-will-prosecuted/Newsweek reports that, a natural diplomat, Buergenthal occasionally finds that his instinct for tact deserts him. During an interview last July with Robert Chalmers, he described George W. Bush as an ignorant person who wanted to show his mother he could do things his father couldnt.
Turning to former Vice-President Dick Cheney and the possibility of his prosecution as a war criminal at the International Criminal Court, Burgenthal stated that I think yes that it will happen.
(S)ome of us have long thought that Cheney, and a number of CIA agents who did what they did in those so-called black holes (overseas torture centres) should appear before the ICC. We (in the USA) could have tried them ourselves. I voted for Obama but I think he made a great mistake when he decided not to instigate legal proceedings against some of these people. I think yes that it will happen.
No, we couldn't have! It was always off the table!
Old Union Guy
(738 posts)Will Hillary?
world wide wally
(21,754 posts)Just a bit of a stretch that would get a lot of support from Frrepers anyway
cprise
(8,445 posts)Kagan and Noodleman/Nuland in the State Dept. come immediately to mind.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I often find the stretching the rational mind to its tearing point rather bemusing... e.g., finding the strength of petulance to reference a Democratic candidate in response to an OP about a GOP VP.
It's indeed, "lurrrvely," and the grade-school rationalizations soon to follow will be delightful.
sus453
(164 posts)If the shoe fits, she needs to wear it.
cprise
(8,445 posts)at State. The one who told her friends she avoids email because of investigations.
She won't prosecute financial and war criminals because she is a cornerstone of their impunity.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Last edited Tue Apr 5, 2016, 09:44 PM - Edit history (1)
Maybe Dick and Dubya are catching up to him. I don't see why Rummy or Rice should be let off the hook either. The GOP couldn't wait to get Carter out of office, so the GOP could go back to supporting RWing death squads.
Response to Old Union Guy (Reply #1)
IHateTheGOP This message was self-deleted by its author.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Condie
Rummy
Wolfy
any other monsters with an "ie" or "y" at the end of their nick names you can think of?
WhiteTara
(29,722 posts)Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)Being an ignorant and arrogant is no defense!
lastlib
(23,287 posts)... is "skinny, drunk, and stupid, with daddy issues." Frog-march the basturd!
Scuba
(53,475 posts)IDemo
(16,926 posts)Zero chance of this ever happening.
malaise
(269,157 posts)and that they are all above it, but you never know these days. Think about the financial leak..then think back to Snowden. Things are changing because of technology and real fear that people will tear it apart unless some controls are reintroduced.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)over a former VP to be tried by an international court (which I'm pretty sure we never signed onto for this exact reason)? If he doesn't leave the US (and I'm thinking with the condition of his health, it's easy for doctors to say he shouldn't travel by air) they can't get him.
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)Could be trusted to bring to justice its own perpetrators of and collaborators in crimes against humanity.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)and convict a former VP on crimes against humanity. It's simply never going to happen. They'd shoot him dead before letting that spectacle happen.
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)... And I'd better not comment on what I think of that alternative option, except to ask: could he be shot, you know, very slowly?
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)but wishing violence on anyone is not something I'm comfortable with. It is safe to say there are those whose deaths will not bother me one bit.
Dustlawyer
(10,497 posts)irisblue
(33,023 posts)to Gods ears and the most effective humans to get Cheney to the Hague sooner then later.
SCVDem
(5,103 posts)Only then I remembered, I'm an atheist!
Damn!
(Can we find an agent Danno to arrest Cheney?)
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)They wrote a law, a bit after 9/11 that would "to protect United States military personnel and other elected and appointed officials of the United States government against criminal prosecution by an international criminal court to which the United States is not party."
It would allow the President to use "all means necessary and appropriate to bring about the release of any U.S. or allied personnel being detained or imprisoned by, on behalf of, or at the request of the International Criminal Court."
Entitled The American Service-Members' Protection Act, proposed by Jesse Helm, this law would protect any member of the Bush Crime Syndicate, the Nixon Crime Syndicate, the Reagan Crime Syndicate or any other criminal from being prosecuted by the Hague.
As such it has been nicknamed "The Hague Invasion Act."
This would have to be repealed, or we could send military forces into the Netherlands to get them out of jail.
Would the US fight the Dutch? The Dutch would probably give them up in a minute. They have such a small military, it's unreal (by US standards).
Here's a link to the Wikipedia Page on it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Service-Members'_Protection_Act
I was first shocked to find this out, but after a while, it made sense to me, considering who introduced it.
former9thward
(32,081 posts)And two opposed it. 26 Republicans voted for it and 20 opposed it. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/107-2002/s145
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Your point?
FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)This is just an emotional outlet for people, but, in reality, nothing can nor will happen.
If the International Court even tried to convict a former US Vice President the political uproar here would be insane.
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)NATO would be required by Treaty to defend the Netherlands against the aggresor...
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)TipTok
(2,474 posts)Mark 750
(79 posts)His crimes go way back. See this link from yesterday... http://www.democraticunderground.com/11788313
or this: http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB543-Ford-White-House-Altered-Rockefeller-Commission-Report/
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)And welcome to DU!
Mark 750
(79 posts)kairos12
(12,872 posts)pressbox69
(2,252 posts)shadowmayor
(1,325 posts)Crystalline. Like clear ice. And yet, in this country, where the average man is taught to genuflect and to always give the benefit of doubt to those in power, I sadly know - that none of these assholes will ever be held accountable. The tsks tsks from the fawning corporate media are the hardest to bear. The deaths, the burnings the pulverising of the Iraqi people is almost beyond imagining. We have been killing Iraqis for 25 years - for what? What in the hell did the people of Iraq ever do to us?
Tragl1
(104 posts)I couldn't agree more with what you said.
elmac
(4,642 posts)for his tin heart?
Beartracks
(12,821 posts)===============
Duval
(4,280 posts)That was hilarious! Let's hope!
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)Mira
(22,380 posts)I have not seen a headline to make me this happy in many years.
Those of you who know me, certainly Bobthedrummer, know this has been my absolute achilles heel about so many things that trouble me when I wake in the night. If there had been no "looking forward" stance by the Obama administration, announced right after I was on the mall for inauguration number 1, Trump could not say "I would use waterboarding as foreplay".
Because Bush/Cheney/ and the rest would have been under investigation for starters and after that, in all probability, in jail for life.
And therefore, America would have preserved its power and wonderfulness as the leader of the free world.
I love Obama. He has done so much, against such incredible horrible odds. But I cannot and will not forgive that stance of not pursuing the war criminals, and as I said it causes me great sadness.
So, having gone a bit crazy responding to this post, I will go read what others are saying.
I'm celebrating the Bernie Wisconsin win, a good personal day for a number of reasons, but above all, I'm celebrating this post.
bullwinkle428
(20,630 posts)SCVDem
(5,103 posts)Then we got Enron'd. My affordable house just got more expensive.
Cheney's response was that we use too much power in So. California. (Actually we were leaders in conservation)
I was in Wisconsin during that time for a visit and listened to bar folk repeating Cheney's lie and disparaging California.
This was after his energy meeting where we don't know who was there or what was discussed.
We got hosed at any rate!
Solly Mack
(90,787 posts)But any trial that doesn't include Bush and the majority of his administration is bullshit.
Ghost in the Machine
(14,912 posts)As of January 2015, 123 states are members of the court.[2] Other countries that have not signed or ratified the Rome Statute include India, Indonesia, and China.[2] On May 6, 2002, the United States, in a position shared with Israel and Sudan, having previously signed the Rome Statute, formally withdrew its intent of ratification.[2]
Positions in the United States concerning the ICC vary widely. The Clinton Administration signed the Rome Statute in 2000, but did not submit it for Senate ratification. The Bush Administration, the US administration at the time of the ICC's founding, stated that it would not join the ICC. The Obama Administration has subsequently re-established a working relationship with the court.[3]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_and_the_International_Criminal_Court
Peace,
Ghost
burrowowl
(17,648 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)Cheney and Bewsh were given their cash-and-carry wars, fleeced the American people and all they got was "away with it".
IOKIYAR.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)Javaman
(62,534 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Javaman
(62,534 posts)the chaney thing, not so much.
jonks2746
(41 posts)Sadly, I doubt that'll ever happen.
inanna
(3,547 posts)Would have HUNDREDS of recommendations.
Kicking. Already rec'd.
NeoGreen
(4,031 posts)...to REC this!
progressoid
(49,999 posts)maindawg
(1,151 posts)Have been killed by our drones? Is that legal? Seems Obama chose not to pursue charges maybe he knew he was also going to get into the game. I hate the Republicans, I hate the Bushes, Dick Cheney and the rest are all despicable people. I don't care that they are free I don't worry about things I cannot control. I care that history will be accurate in its representation of these murderous assholes.
If we can somehow eventually rid ourselves of these billionaire parasites (which I doubt we will) then we can acurratley record our history. But we are on a path that is going to lead to our ultimate destruction anyway, so what does it matter.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,198 posts)Will? No.