General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIdea of “earning” health care may be rooted in America’s slaveholding past
http://californiaonecare.org/idea-of-earning-health-care-may-be-rooted-in-americas-slaveholding-past/As the essay above mentioned, inequality was built into the DNA of the U.S. Constitution, and slavery built American capitalism (a book outlining the latter point in detail, but not mentioned in Lawrences essay, is Edward Baptists The Half Has Never Been Told: Slavery and the Making of American Capitalism). Lawrence notes that the cultural attitude in America is that everyone living here who isnt wealthy is only useful for doing
wage work for the benefit of the capitalist system.
I would add that those who, for various reasons, dont work, cant work or cant find work are seen as less than, surplus or useless (with the exception of retirees). American society makes it extremely difficult for such people to survive, let alone thrive, and they are resented by others for taking public assistance, the reason being that they havent earned it. Never mind that every American uses at least one government program of some kind (the mortgage interest deduction is a popular middle class government program).
Having to earn health care rather than it being a right conferred to people by virtue of being born and/or living in America is a principle embedded in racist culture. I believe it is the principle by which the U.S. stubbornly clings to the inefficient and unfair system of employer-provided private health coverage. One must work to have access to high quality health coverage, preferably at a good-paying, middle class job. If you are unfortunate enough to only land low-wage work, because of lack of education or a bad economy, and your employer doesnt provide health coverage, you were left with nothing at all before the Affordable Care Act passed, or with lower-tier Medicaid after the law passed. For many poor people living in states where Republican-controlled legislatures have refused to expand Medicaid, the situation is the same as before health reform.
Wounded Bear
(58,717 posts)that Repubs, and Conservatives in general don't respect work. Not really. They like to claim the white collar jobs in finance and stock market offices are true "work" when in fact they are more gambling than working. They certainly have no respect for people who work for someone else. In their minds, anybody who really counts should be running their own business, or making their living day trading stocks or something, anything that is "entrepreneurial" in their minds.
Of course, most wealthy people in America, like anywhere else in the world earned their wealth the old fashioned way, they inherited it. At worst, most of them started out on second or third base, to call up an old canard. And to finish the line, they think they hit a homer, that is they did all the work. Pres Obama's line about "they didn't do that" was understood by anybody who knows how the hard working people of the world get along. Only someone of privilege stoking their ego thinks they got where they are completely on their own efforts, with no assistance from any outside source. At best they'll thank God, instead of the public institutions which made their accumulation of wealth possible.
Working class, to them, means lower class, and don't deserve anything extra, meaning anything more than someone in the owner/CEO class is willing to pay them.
Thanks for the link.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)Capitalism is inherently lopsided- it needs colonies, slaves or suckers to be obscenely profitable.
Hence the ownership class. They talk a lot about how the people making them rich are inherently undeserving. Basically, we're all animals or some other type of non-human to them, and are lucky to get any kind of scraps or crumbs. BTW, they deserve tax cuts and subsidies- who else would rule us if they weren't around?
ConsiderThis_2016
(274 posts)This points to the problem already in progress roughly 250 years ago, when in reality it began roughly 6,000.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)Those who are wealthy deserve it because of god's grace. Those who don't have it are slackers.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)There are still people here in the South who believe in the curse on the children of Ham.
How conservatives think is fascinating. I first started reading when I worked for a couple who wasted incredible resources making sure a really fine set of employees weren't cheating them.
Social scientists have identified a pervasive conservative characteristic that explains so much: Belief in a Just World. They sometimes call them BJWs. Calvinism exemplified it, but it also exists independent of formal theology. Those who are worthy tend to sift upward, and the unworthy sift downward, all tending to get what they earn. This natural order is good, and inevitable, and attempting to interfere, such as through social programs, does far more harm than good.
Plus, conservatives' belief in the natural inequality of men. This "all men are created equal and endowed with inalienable right" doctrine is pure liberal nonsense to them. They know it's not true -- and should not be. They are comfortable with inquality and unfairness as manifestations, again, of a natural order where people earn their positions in society. And/or God assigns them.
It is now known that conservatives have a naturally darker view of humanity, with a natural believe that most people will be lazy, immoral, dishonest, and irresponsible if not forced to be otherwise. Thus their belief that vast numbers of lazy people will prefer to use social programs to sit around in poverty all day to doing well by working.
W consulted his "gut" because that's where these kinds of convictions are generated in conservatives. They're things that are just known, the more conservative the stronger the conviction, and also the more leaders push this stuff, the stronger the conviction.
And if that is also combined with conservative religions, which of course incorporate all these genetically wired predispositions, you have people not only sure that liberalism will destroy the nation if they don't stop it but sure that that's what God wants of them.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)can be explained away with Calvinism.
Solly Mack
(90,787 posts)Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)ck4829
(35,091 posts)Like comparing the pre-existing conditions of health insurance with getting insurance after a car is totaled or a house sets on fire. People aren't houses or cars, and people lose insurance because they age out or the insurance company no longer exists.
If foreign invaders landed on our shores and started killing a small number of people in our country, the federal government would respond to them, and it would cross party lines, it would be a total response. However, change 'foreign invaders landed on our shoes and' to 'injury, your own cells turning against you in the form of cancer, and microbes in the form of illness' and all of the sudden it becomes a burden, it becomes... SOCIALISM.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)alarimer
(16,245 posts)Health insurance as an earned benefit started during the war when companies were not allowed to raise wages to attract employees. So they offered fringe benefits like insurance instead.
Most universal health care systems started after WWII as well: the NHS, Canada's system (Google Tommy Douglas for that), etc, etc. Many were slave-holding countries as well. I think blaming everything in the present on stuff we did in the past is a real stretch.
newblewtoo
(667 posts)you are correct but exactly what difference would that make to those wanting to bash religion in general and Christianity in particular?