Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mia

(8,361 posts)
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:37 PM Mar 2016

H.R. 347 and the right to protest

An older article, but worth reading again in light of recent events.

Recent days have seen significant concern about an unassuming bill with an unassuming name: the "Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011." The bill, H.R. 347, has been variously described as making the First Amendment illegal or criminalizing the Occupy protests.

The truth is more mundane, but the issues raised are still of major significance for the First Amendment.

It's important to note — contrary to some reports — that H.R. 347 doesn't create any new crimes, or directly apply to the Occupy protests. The bill slightly rewrites a short trespass law, originally passed in 1971 and amended a couple of times since, that covers areas subject to heightened Secret Service security measures.

These restricted areas include locations where individuals under Secret Service protection are temporarily located, and certain large special events like a presidential inauguration. They can also include large public events like the Super Bowl and the presidential nominating conventions (troublingly, the Department of Homeland Security has significant discretion in designating what qualifies as one of these special events)....


https://www.aclu.org/blog/how-big-deal-hr-347-criminalizing-protest-bill

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hr347/text

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
H.R. 347 and the right to protest (Original Post) mia Mar 2016 OP
what is a corporation or a pile of money wanted to protest? Takket Mar 2016 #1
"citizens united is at conflict with this bill, is it not?" mia Mar 2016 #2
Yup nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #3

Takket

(21,578 posts)
1. what is a corporation or a pile of money wanted to protest?
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:41 PM
Mar 2016

citizens united is at conflict with this bill, is it not?

mia

(8,361 posts)
2. "citizens united is at conflict with this bill, is it not?"
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:46 PM
Mar 2016

Haven't a clue about your question. What do you think?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»H.R. 347 and the right to...