General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsH.R. 347 and the right to protest
An older article, but worth reading again in light of recent events.
Recent days have seen significant concern about an unassuming bill with an unassuming name: the "Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011." The bill, H.R. 347, has been variously described as making the First Amendment illegal or criminalizing the Occupy protests.
The truth is more mundane, but the issues raised are still of major significance for the First Amendment.
It's important to note contrary to some reports that H.R. 347 doesn't create any new crimes, or directly apply to the Occupy protests. The bill slightly rewrites a short trespass law, originally passed in 1971 and amended a couple of times since, that covers areas subject to heightened Secret Service security measures.
These restricted areas include locations where individuals under Secret Service protection are temporarily located, and certain large special events like a presidential inauguration. They can also include large public events like the Super Bowl and the presidential nominating conventions (troublingly, the Department of Homeland Security has significant discretion in designating what qualifies as one of these special events)....
https://www.aclu.org/blog/how-big-deal-hr-347-criminalizing-protest-bill
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hr347/text
Takket
(21,578 posts)citizens united is at conflict with this bill, is it not?
mia
(8,361 posts)Haven't a clue about your question. What do you think?