Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 12:27 AM Mar 2016

When did the name change to "HIV-AIDS"?

Last edited Sat Mar 12, 2016, 01:08 AM - Edit history (1)

Not a political question, but the Nancy Reagan back and forth got me wondering this.

When I was in high school (early 90s) the name of the disease as far as I can remember was "AIDS", and its cause was HIV. Sometime between then and now the "official" name seems to have changed to "HIV-AIDS". Was that a policy decision by somebody? (WHO? CDC? Somebody else?) I get that there are probably many ways to acquire an immunodeficiency syndrome of some sort, so being more specific might be necessary, but I just don't remember ever getting the memo, as they say.

EDIT, because I'm apparently not being clear:

I'm aware of the difference between the virus HIV and the disease it causes. I'm asking whether I am correct in remembering that the name of the disease used to be "AIDS" and now seems to be "HIV-AIDS".

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When did the name change to "HIV-AIDS"? (Original Post) Recursion Mar 2016 OP
I'm not sure but LiberalElite Mar 2016 #1
yes. nt Viva_La_Revolution Mar 2016 #2
HIV/AIDS since 1990 JennyMominFL Mar 2016 #3
Welcome to DU JennyMominFl Greybnk48 Mar 2016 #12
Thank you, Jenny... TeeYiYi Mar 2016 #13
Thanks for posting. ronnie624 Mar 2016 #14
A long time ago. SheilaT Mar 2016 #4
HIV is what you get PowerToThePeople Mar 2016 #5
Yeah... Wounded Bear Mar 2016 #6
HIV is the virus Chasstev365 Mar 2016 #7
HIV is the virus. AIDS is the disease profile. Warpy Mar 2016 #8
In 1981 it was called GRID & "gay" cancer. 1982 in a report from the CDC it was called AIDS. Solly Mack Mar 2016 #9
And it wasn't even recognized as being a single virus until something like '86 or '87. Igel Mar 2016 #15
At first, it was AIDS because they didn't know the cause. Avalux Mar 2016 #10
Dunno but the only thing I remember growing up hearing besides HIV-AIDS was the Retrovirus. Rex Mar 2016 #11

JennyMominFL

(218 posts)
3. HIV/AIDS since 1990
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 12:38 AM
Mar 2016

First post. I've been HIV positive since 1990. Diagnosed with AIDS from the beginning. I have seen HIV/Aids used since I was first diagnosed. Some people just have HIV. Other are HIV+ with AIDS. It's just trying to incorporate everyone who is HIV pos into one statement

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
4. A long time ago.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 12:40 AM
Mar 2016

There's a lot of back and forth between HIV and AIDS. Often someone is described as HIV positive, especially when that person tests positive for the virus but does not otherwise show symptoms.

Wounded Bear

(58,704 posts)
6. Yeah...
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 12:44 AM
Mar 2016

the thing is that the AIDS crisis of the 80's was kind of the first widespread knowledge of a whole range of auto-immune diseases. I imagine the current name is a way to keep it specific to the HIV derived version of AIDS.

This was badly mis-handled by the Reagan administration, largely because of the religious influence on them. Since it first became endemic among gay men, many "Christians" called it a cross between a scourge from God and a blessing, because it attacked one of their favorite groups to hate on. Once it bled over into the straight community through blood transfusions and needle sharing among druggies, it was all whoops! we better look into this.

Not sure when the transition occurred, though. I do know that several other disease vectors have been classified as auto-immune disorders now that didn't used to have a lot of knowledge about them like lupus.

Chasstev365

(5,191 posts)
7. HIV is the virus
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 12:46 AM
Mar 2016

AIDS is the condition when the virus begins destroying the immune system. Hence one can have the virus om them, but not develop AIDS.

Warpy

(111,338 posts)
8. HIV is the virus. AIDS is the disease profile.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 01:05 AM
Mar 2016

It was GRID (gay related immunodeficiency) until straight women, drug users and blood recipients started to get it. Then it was AIDS. HIV was isolated after years of holocaust with few treatments. Now it's mostly a chronic, progressive disease that's a pain in the ass to take care of but which we've been able to slow down considerably.

I think the HIV-AIDS hypenation is a little silly, although it does differentiate between viral and other acquired immunodeficiency.

Solly Mack

(90,785 posts)
9. In 1981 it was called GRID & "gay" cancer. 1982 in a report from the CDC it was called AIDS.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 01:07 AM
Mar 2016

Last edited Sat Mar 12, 2016, 01:44 AM - Edit history (1)

But it was called AIDS for the first time during the summer of '82. GRID was stigmatizing and inaccurate and people voted to give it another name. Those people being the ones on the front-line.

People (finally) realized that HIV/AIDS wasn't just infecting gay men.

HIV (as LAV) dates back to 1983 but it wasn't until 1986 that it was officially known as HIV. Entire story behind that, covered in the book/movie, "And the Band Played On".

I won't get into the Gallo/Montagnier battles, but I will say that it was the French who took the Nobel Prize for discovering the cause of the disease AIDS - which is the virus HIV.

Igel

(35,356 posts)
15. And it wasn't even recognized as being a single virus until something like '86 or '87.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 09:50 AM
Mar 2016

During all this time, though, the funding through various government agencies for investigating it soared. By '86 in one agency HIV/AIDS research funding alone was greater than funding for all other diseases, and not because of funding cuts, either.

Then there were all the problems with trying to figure out how to stop it. ACT UP got fast tracking for HIV drugs, but most of those wound up doing nothing good. Some did some bad things. But each "we got this drugged approved" was a great victory, and when it turned out to be not so useful nobody remembered anything but the victory. That's how echo-chamber communities work. After years of failure, all anybody remembered were victories and the question, Why didn't we score all those awesome victories years earlier? Few stopped to ponder that the victories were mostly pyrrhic.

In hindsight, it's perfectly clear that they knew what the virus was that caused AIDS. At the time, there was a lot of debate about whether it was one identified virus, another identified virus, a set of viruses, or a virus still unknown, or a virus (or some viruses) plus environmental factors. Mostly because they found the virus in AIDS patients, but they often didn't find the virus.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
10. At first, it was AIDS because they didn't know the cause.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 01:11 AM
Mar 2016

Then they figured out it was a virus and called it Human Immunodeficiency Virus.

HIV and AIDS were often put together after that, but not officially. A person can be HIV-infected but not have AIDS because their immune system is still working and they aren't sick. Once the virus destroys the immune system, then a person can get a constellation of secondary illnesses that fall under the umbrella of AIDS.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
11. Dunno but the only thing I remember growing up hearing besides HIV-AIDS was the Retrovirus.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 01:18 AM
Mar 2016

That was in the 80s, 90s.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»When did the name change ...