Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 10:51 AM Mar 2016

Do Organic Growers Use ‘Hazmat’ Suits?

Last edited Fri Mar 11, 2016, 02:46 PM - Edit history (2)

http://iowameetsmaui.com/2014/11/17/do-organic-growers-use-hazmat-suits/


"I came across this image the other day. A farmer spraying his field wearing a protective suit and face respirator. When I see this, I see a farmer keeping himself and those around him safe. When activists look at this, they seem to see a scary hazmat suit and chemical poisoning. The beauty of this photo, is that it was taken from a video about an organic cauliflower grower in California. This farmer is spraying a “natural soap spray”. Obviously, this spray poses some danger to the tractor operator, or he wouldn’t be using this Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). Compliments are in order to this business for instituting safe handling practices.

What constitutes a harmful substance? Well, just about everything on earth is harmful to us if not used properly, so knowing when to use PPE is important. The National Pesticide Information Center lists 4 signal words to look for on a label. Listed from least toxic to most toxic, these words are: Caution, Warning, Danger, and Danger/Poison. A quick glance through my own cupboard revealed household cleaners with three of these signal words. Here are examples of substances from each category and the PPE they require:

...

What we see in these examples is that a chemical with a signal word of “Warning”, that is labeled for organic production, requires far more Personal Protective Equipment than one with a signal word of Danger/Poison. This doesn’t mean that the Lorsban 4E is safer, just that it has different requirements in PPE for the applicator. Almost all farmers use pesticides, and it’s likely that they will at some point need some form of protective equipment – organic and conventional growers alike."


-------------------------

Hazmat suit on GM fields: used by anti-GMO activists (not researchers) to spread fear

From:
http://debunkingdenialism.com/2013/08/25/decimating-the-flawed-beliefs-of-anti-gmo-activists/

"In July of 2011, anti-GMO activists dressed up in Hazmat suits destroyed fields trials of genetically modified wheat at CSIRO (the national science agency in Australia) facility in Canberra. They caused damage for around 300 000 USD and set back research at least a year. According to Jeremy Burdon, the industry plant chief, Hazmat suits are not worn by researchers working on GM field trials because there are no hazards there. Researchers working with the genetically modified wheat call the hazmat suits “theatrical” and a “publicity stunt, designed to mislead the public and spread unwarranted fear” (Bettles, 2011)."


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

More on these deceitful memes:
http://christopherkeelty.com/this-is-my-beef-with-the-anti-gmo-folks/



---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Once again we learn that scary memes are often FOS, especially when propagated by anti-GMO extremism.

84 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Do Organic Growers Use ‘Hazmat’ Suits? (Original Post) HuckleB Mar 2016 OP
I don't OkSustainAg Mar 2016 #1
Internet claims are worthless, as are anecdotes. HuckleB Mar 2016 #3
I have shown OkSustainAg Mar 2016 #5
So your claims are not peer reviewed, nor replicated. HuckleB Mar 2016 #7
300 bushels of corn per acre, people could grow their own if zoning/neighborhood Ass. didn't ban it. Sunlei Mar 2016 #8
Another unsupported claim. HuckleB Mar 2016 #9
front yard crops Sunlei Mar 2016 #11
My garden is in the front yard. HuckleB Mar 2016 #13
Thats not allowed, its a crime in most neighborhoods across America. Lawns only. Sunlei Mar 2016 #14
Too many tomatoes. HuckleB Mar 2016 #15
that's pretty good for a front yard. If you had 50 tomato plants used an entire average front yard, Sunlei Mar 2016 #16
I only have six. HuckleB Mar 2016 #17
I grow 30 tomato plants every year Drahthaardogs Mar 2016 #57
Too many rats in Chicago. I got 2 tomatoes last year from 3 plants. AngryAmish Mar 2016 #38
My dogs,Jack russell and another mix, rats & any ground varmints don't have a chance here. Sunlei Mar 2016 #39
Ah, yeah. It could be the cat that helps for us. HuckleB Mar 2016 #43
I don't have a problem with animals eating my tomatoes, so I can't help you. HuckleB Mar 2016 #41
Then more neighborhoods need to be like yours. As it is, either zoning or the HOA Recursion Mar 2016 #79
Yeah, I'm lucky, I guess. HuckleB Mar 2016 #81
Most yards are far, far smaller than an acre REP Mar 2016 #21
Are you really trying to ruin that fantasy? HuckleB Mar 2016 #24
Sorry. REP Mar 2016 #25
Well, I'm not cutting down my trees, either. HuckleB Mar 2016 #27
But if you took down your trees, razed your house REP Mar 2016 #29
I'd have all kinds of corn, at the same time I can buy ears dirt cheap. HuckleB Mar 2016 #33
true, grow stuff that is expensive in the stores. I have raspberries, blackberries and table grapes. Sunlei Mar 2016 #44
Yeah, that's why I do lots of different "specialty" peppers, especially. HuckleB Mar 2016 #45
your chickens would eat the corn, they love it :) Sunlei Mar 2016 #40
I realize yards are smaller but I want people to know even a small yard can produce enough. Sunlei Mar 2016 #26
That assumes a lot REP Mar 2016 #28
start small with 10 "hills" and a pack of seeds and one doesn't need any of that other stuff Sunlei Mar 2016 #31
Some of that list would be a one time thing though. Lancero Mar 2016 #59
You wouldn't even need that much space Major Nikon Mar 2016 #42
Is insecticidal soap or horticultural oil "poison" to anything besides insects? Major Nikon Mar 2016 #53
Totally different if you're a farmer... Buddyblazon Mar 2016 #70
+1,000 ... 000 ... 000 HuckleB Mar 2016 #71
The organic raspberry farm I get my berries from here in NM womanofthehills Mar 2016 #73
Yeah, and nothing else. HuckleB Mar 2016 #78
Bwa ha ha. That OP screed has been so completely debunked. AxionExcel Mar 2016 #2
Yes, you are wasting our time. HuckleB Mar 2016 #4
I'm sure OCA, NaturalNews, and Mercola all have the scoop on it Major Nikon Mar 2016 #34
His/her favorite today: Henry Rowlands. HuckleB Mar 2016 #37
part of it is to keep from getting soaked & having to work outside dripping wet from head to toe Sunlei Mar 2016 #6
They sure do... SidDithers Mar 2016 #10
Some do; it helps with some of the fertilizers especially Recursion Mar 2016 #12
14 FACTS THE ORGANIC INDUSTRY DOESN’T WANT YOU TO KNOW HuckleB Mar 2016 #18
I use insecticidal soap in my greenhouse; you wouldn't want a face full of it REP Mar 2016 #19
Yup. HuckleB Mar 2016 #20
Most people don't get the difference between hobby gardens and industrial food production pediatricmedic Mar 2016 #22
But everyone's yard is at least an acre! REP Mar 2016 #23
They could but corns inexpensive. I got 400 dozen eggs a year off a quarter acre :P Sunlei Mar 2016 #30
True and discussions of that would be far more helpful than flamebait Gormy Cuss Mar 2016 #32
Sure, because this is just so much more mature and insightful Major Nikon Mar 2016 #35
Both you and the OP responded in that thread at length Gormy Cuss Mar 2016 #46
...and you refrained from pointing out the lack of maturity of that obvious flamebait OP Major Nikon Mar 2016 #48
So unless one comments in all absurd threads, one can't comment in any? Gormy Cuss Mar 2016 #49
The ones chosen to comment on is very telling Major Nikon Mar 2016 #52
I avoided that thread for much of the day. HuckleB Mar 2016 #51
Okay,, I'll address why I called it flamebait. Gormy Cuss Mar 2016 #54
That poster has a long history of promoting anti-GMO stances. HuckleB Mar 2016 #55
No, my history is that I'm pro-GMO labeling. Gormy Cuss Mar 2016 #62
No difference, unless you want labeling for all types of seed development technology. HuckleB Mar 2016 #67
Labelling products from all seeds would be acceptable. Gormy Cuss Mar 2016 #76
And that's because organic and non-GMO marketers are lying. HuckleB Mar 2016 #77
Yeah, it's horrible to point out that ludicrous anti-GMO memes are ludicrous. HuckleB Mar 2016 #36
I thought they worse that stuff, no matter what industry, for their own safety. Rex Mar 2016 #47
Plus, it looks cool. HuckleB Mar 2016 #50
Do organic farmers send creepy obscenity-laden DU mails? U4ikLefty Mar 2016 #56
Awesome! HuckleB Mar 2016 #58
Wait, you mean the personality disorders of Big-Agra shills U4ikLefty Mar 2016 #60
Wow! Now, you're promoting stigma for people with mental illness. HuckleB Mar 2016 #61
I don't equate mental illness with being an asshole with no boundaries. U4ikLefty Mar 2016 #63
Hypocrisy is a funny thing. HuckleB Mar 2016 #64
Guess you saw hypocrisy in the mirror. nt U4ikLefty Mar 2016 #65
I know you are, but what am I? HuckleB Mar 2016 #66
Already back to the third grade ROFL smileys? You must be out of bullets. U4ikLefty Mar 2016 #68
That's so cute. HuckleB Mar 2016 #69
Wow - it seems like your main interest in life is womanofthehills Mar 2016 #74
Wow -- it seems like your main interest in life is HuckleB Mar 2016 #75
Hey, what do you think about anti-GMO memes that are this deceitful? HuckleB Mar 2016 #83
Do anti-GMOers always push fictions and logical fallacies? HuckleB Mar 2016 #72
Back when I had an apiary my suit was even scarier Recursion Mar 2016 #80
Well, I hope you got pics! HuckleB Mar 2016 #82
. HuckleB Mar 2016 #84

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
3. Internet claims are worthless, as are anecdotes.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 10:59 AM
Mar 2016

when you produce enough per acre to feed the planet without more deforestation, write up your methods, and get it published.

OkSustainAg

(203 posts)
5. I have shown
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 11:18 AM
Mar 2016

hundreds of people how to be more sustainable. In real life. I recently have started talking about it on the internet. I am not a writer. I am a farmer.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
8. 300 bushels of corn per acre, people could grow their own if zoning/neighborhood Ass. didn't ban it.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 11:28 AM
Mar 2016

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
9. Another unsupported claim.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 11:30 AM
Mar 2016

Lots of people have gardens. They're great. They're not very efficient in terms of production. Why respond with nothing but the usual meme claims?

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
14. Thats not allowed, its a crime in most neighborhoods across America. Lawns only.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 12:04 PM
Mar 2016

How much does your 'front yard garden' produce?

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
15. Too many tomatoes.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 12:16 PM
Mar 2016

Enough sweet peppers to do some canning. A regular supply of cucumbers. Plenty of herbs. Shade keeps me limited, but those trees are needed.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
16. that's pretty good for a front yard. If you had 50 tomato plants used an entire average front yard,
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 12:42 PM
Mar 2016

that would be more then enough for a year- for a family? And more to trade.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
17. I only have six.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 12:44 PM
Mar 2016

Last edited Fri Mar 11, 2016, 02:40 PM - Edit history (1)

We give away at least half them, have plenty to eat fresh for three months, and then lots and lots of canning happens. Still, we would never come close to feeding ourselves. It's just for fun.

Drahthaardogs

(6,843 posts)
57. I grow 30 tomato plants every year
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 08:36 PM
Mar 2016

San Marzano Redorta, Cuore di Bue, Romano Costaluto, and Liguria tomatoes. I can over 100 quarts and I use every quart throughout the summer. I also grow about thirty Jimmy Nardello peppers (there is no finer sweet pepper), and 50 Bacio di Satana peppers plants. As you likely guess, I am italian American.

 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
38. Too many rats in Chicago. I got 2 tomatoes last year from 3 plants.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 06:16 PM
Mar 2016

About thirty buds.

People where there are no rats? How do you keep things from eating your tomatoes?

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
39. My dogs,Jack russell and another mix, rats & any ground varmints don't have a chance here.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 06:44 PM
Mar 2016

My dogs aren't outside dogs but they go out frequently and that tends to have 'critters' stay away, move on.

My dogs catch (and kill) an occasional rat, I'm in Houston near lots of people. I haven't seen a raccoon or opossum in years.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
41. I don't have a problem with animals eating my tomatoes, so I can't help you.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 06:50 PM
Mar 2016

I did grow some corn one year, but the squirrels took that for themselves. I haven't bothered again. Besides, when I get 8 ears for a buck at the same time I would be harvesting, there's not much point.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
79. Then more neighborhoods need to be like yours. As it is, either zoning or the HOA
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 10:15 PM
Mar 2016

prevent a troubling amount of Americans from growing any food for themselves.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
81. Yeah, I'm lucky, I guess.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 10:16 PM
Mar 2016

Where I live no one is going to get far telling others what to do with their yards.

REP

(21,691 posts)
21. Most yards are far, far smaller than an acre
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 02:24 PM
Mar 2016

I can't imagine anyone wanting to have their entire lot planted wall-to-wall corn, especially on the usual 1/8 acre or smaller lot.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
24. Are you really trying to ruin that fantasy?
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 02:42 PM
Mar 2016

This is part of how the anti-GMO movement sucks people in with "feel good" silliness like this.

REP

(21,691 posts)
25. Sorry.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 02:45 PM
Mar 2016

My lot is actually about an acre, but it's clay. If I filled it with corn, there'd be no place for the chickens to forage, and I'd have to truck in a few tons of topsoil ... but instead of my view of redwood forest and mountains, I could gaze out upon endless corn.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
27. Well, I'm not cutting down my trees, either.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 02:56 PM
Mar 2016

And who would have the time to tend to such fields in this world? Most people would not, I don't think.

REP

(21,691 posts)
29. But if you took down your trees, razed your house
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 02:59 PM
Mar 2016

you could grow so much corn!

See my post down thread about how much it costs to "save 100s" with a garden. (I do can almost everything that can be canned in my yard, but luckily I have old, established plants that thrive on neglect.)

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
33. I'd have all kinds of corn, at the same time I can buy ears dirt cheap.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 04:37 PM
Mar 2016

Sounds like a definite plan!

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
44. true, grow stuff that is expensive in the stores. I have raspberries, blackberries and table grapes.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 06:52 PM
Mar 2016

just a couple of each growing on my fences and we get a lot of berries & many pounds of grapes. The grapes I was really surprised how well they did no care at all., 3 little plants and the next year they were huge and full of fruit.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
45. Yeah, that's why I do lots of different "specialty" peppers, especially.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 07:12 PM
Mar 2016

They can vary in output here, most summers are mild, but the last two have been very warm, and so things have been bountiful. Of course, I've also had to water much more frequently.

Truth be told, I prefer the cooler summers, but there advantages to the warmth, too.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
26. I realize yards are smaller but I want people to know even a small yard can produce enough.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 02:50 PM
Mar 2016

A small bit of land can produce enough to save a family $100s at the grocery store.

And I think front "lawn"s are a horrible waste of useable space.

REP

(21,691 posts)
28. That assumes a lot
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 02:56 PM
Mar 2016

The soil will allow planting of certain plants
Time and knowledge to tend and harvest plants
Time and knowledge to can excess production

To "save" that money, things must be purchased:
Seeds
Topsoil if soil is poor
Gardening tools
Shade cloth
Plant supports
Fertilizer
Insecticides
Fungicides
Canner (pressure canner for low-acid produce)
Canning rack
Cans
Lifter
Canning funnel
Etc

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
31. start small with 10 "hills" and a pack of seeds and one doesn't need any of that other stuff
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 03:52 PM
Mar 2016

(you need a shovel to turn a hill)

Lancero

(3,003 posts)
59. Some of that list would be a one time thing though.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 08:43 PM
Mar 2016

Dry out a bit of the harvest for seeds
.
Gardening tools don't need to be purchased each year. The same shovel, hoe, rake and tiller will last for years.

Shade cloth isn't that much of a necessity, though admittedly this would vary from place to place.

Most plant supports can be reused for years.

Canning equipment would be reusable as well. The jars themselves are reusable too, you'd just need to get new bands for them.
Even then though, dehydrating and freezing are both alternatives to canning.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
42. You wouldn't even need that much space
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 06:50 PM
Mar 2016

A small greenhouse with an aquaponics setup can support virtually all of the nutritional requirements for a family of 4. Some people are even doing it in basements and garages with artificial lighting.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
53. Is insecticidal soap or horticultural oil "poison" to anything besides insects?
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 08:14 PM
Mar 2016

Sustainability is certainly a laudable goal, but proclaiming that one must never spray anything in order to do so just doesn't make that much sense and neither does proclaiming all pesticides are "poison". Salt and caffeine are "poison" in the right dose and so is water for that matter.

 

Buddyblazon

(3,014 posts)
70. Totally different if you're a farmer...
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 09:58 PM
Mar 2016

Integrated Pest Management is a must. Now they could be using all organic pesticides and fungicides. There are many. Neem to name one. It's still smart to wear a bunny suit. Spray goes everywhere and even if it's organic it can irritate the skin. Poison ivy is organic. Don't want it to touch your skin.

If your crop is healthy, organic treatments are great
as preventative. If your crop comes down with a malady it's difficult to beat on a grand scale with organics.

These are just the facts of farming. Knew a certified organic tomato farmer that spent years trying to beat Russet Mites. Finally decertified just so he could spray something that would cure the problem...or he would've lost his farm.

I think it's important people start to educate themselves more on pesticides/fungicides. Not all are going to give you cancer. And many, if used at the proper time, are gone from the plant by the time harvest comes around.

AxionExcel

(755 posts)
2. Bwa ha ha. That OP screed has been so completely debunked.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 10:59 AM
Mar 2016

Why do you waste our time with these Digital Stoning Parties aimed at clean food?

Such a waste of everyone's time. No point in coming back to this thread.

Please go eat your GMO-Chemical Hormone-injected rations quietly in the corner.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
6. part of it is to keep from getting soaked & having to work outside dripping wet from head to toe
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 11:23 AM
Mar 2016

Especially when its cold outside, even if just your face uncovered the mist will run down to the tractor seat

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
18. 14 FACTS THE ORGANIC INDUSTRY DOESN’T WANT YOU TO KNOW
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 01:01 PM
Mar 2016

Last edited Fri Mar 11, 2016, 01:36 PM - Edit history (1)

http://dontwastethecrumbs.com/2015/03/14-facts-the-organic-industry-doesnt-want-you-to-know/

"...

(1) Pesticides are allowed in organic production.

...

(2) Some “natural” chemicals used in organic farming are carcinogenic.

...

(3) Organic pesticides aren’t always as effective as synthetic, and may require more application in order to achieve the same protection.

..."

REP

(21,691 posts)
19. I use insecticidal soap in my greenhouse; you wouldn't want a face full of it
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 02:10 PM
Mar 2016

The main components of most insecticidal soap are alcohol and soap. In my little greenhouse, applying it with a pump sprayer isn't a big deal, but if I were applying it to acres and acres of fields ... I'd wear at least face and breathing protection.

pediatricmedic

(397 posts)
22. Most people don't get the difference between hobby gardens and industrial food production
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 02:29 PM
Mar 2016

A number of posts in this thread give a good example of that lack of understanding.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
30. They could but corns inexpensive. I got 400 dozen eggs a year off a quarter acre :P
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 03:35 PM
Mar 2016

and 3 bushels of corn off the seeds I planted in a 'done' compost pile (from the hens house wood chip litter) That composted area was about only 20 x 20. I crammed the seeds in there and they sprouted within 2 days.

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
32. True and discussions of that would be far more helpful than flamebait
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 04:07 PM
Mar 2016

like the OP. For that matter, the OP topic would be a good platform for intelligent conversation on the limitations of industrial scale organic farming, on integrated pest management as a tool for reducing the need for pesticides, etc.

Instead it's just another immature salvo from the biggest proponent of GMOs on DU.

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
46. Both you and the OP responded in that thread at length
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 07:39 PM
Mar 2016

so why the new, absurd flamebait thread rather than a serious discussion? Oh right, because serious discussion is more work.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
48. ...and you refrained from pointing out the lack of maturity of that obvious flamebait OP
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 07:47 PM
Mar 2016

So it seems a bit strange as to why you'd do so with this one, especially when it's an attempt to counter the aforementioned immature nonsense.

Believe it or not that same bullshit meme is being used over and over in threads which are a genuine attempt at engaging in rational discussion on the subject, along with a never ending stream of nonsense like this....

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022429058#post6

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
52. The ones chosen to comment on is very telling
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 08:02 PM
Mar 2016

Especially when there's nothing immature or flamebait about the OP. Included in the OP is this link which is maturely addressing a very real, deceptive, immature, and all too often tactic of the anti-GMO folks. Believe it or not, this is something that very much transcends just this website.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
51. I avoided that thread for much of the day.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 07:57 PM
Mar 2016

That thread's OP promotes deceitful propaganda. How is anyone going to discuss anything after that. You don't seem to be very objective here.

Heck, you don't call out those OPs at all. Now, why is that?

And you really should justify your claim about this OP. It is not flamebait at all. It is addressing flamebait. There is a very big difference.

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
54. Okay,, I'll address why I called it flamebait.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 08:29 PM
Mar 2016

Because it's railing about organics and anti-GMOers without context (apparently YOU were reacting to other OPs but that's not evident in yours) as if looking for some flaming reaction. A link to the thread or threads you were reacting to or a statement about them would have been helpful.

You then replied with considerable snark to a poster who talked about 'sustainable' practices for home gardeners. That was flamey.

As for the thread linked by Major Nikon, that was also flamebait and it had already been discussed to death when I saw it.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
55. That poster has a long history of promoting anti-GMO stances.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 08:30 PM
Mar 2016

His posts here were meant to distract from the actual content of the OP, by pretending that he does something everyone should be doing.

Your history appears to be one that supports anti-GMO stances. I don't think you're being honest here. Further, the other OP is ten times the flamebait. The fact that you didn't start there remains telling.

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
62. No, my history is that I'm pro-GMO labeling.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 08:48 PM
Mar 2016

Big difference. I'm also annoyed when GMO backers conflate hybridization and GE in order to convince people that there's no potential harm in the latter (it's as dumb as when the anti-GMOers confuse pesticide/herbicides with GMO crops.)

On DU I've read at least one really good defense of GMOs penned by a scientist (MikeC.) Most of the time it's nonsense barbs posted on both sides with an occasional intelligent post lost in the middle.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
67. No difference, unless you want labeling for all types of seed development technology.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 09:00 PM
Mar 2016

And the fact that there is no justification for such labeling does make your stance anti-GMO. Your last comment shows that you are either not being honest, or haven't bothered to read much, btw.

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
76. Labelling products from all seeds would be acceptable.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 11:41 AM
Mar 2016

The ONLY reason there is a push against labeling is that the ag and food industries recognize that consumer sentiment is overwhelmingly against GMOs in the food supply, just as it was overwhelmingly against irradiated food. Labeling is a profit-killer unless the industries can convince consumers of a benefit (and calling consumers 'anti-science' is not going to convince anyone.)


As for your last comment, I've read a lot of threads on this topic. The dishonesty is on your part.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
77. And that's because organic and non-GMO marketers are lying.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 10:11 PM
Mar 2016

They have created myths about GMOs that are ludicrous, all aimed at increasing number their profits. Wake up. You have been conned

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
47. I thought they worse that stuff, no matter what industry, for their own safety.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 07:44 PM
Mar 2016

Because of ONE modified Cheeto...THIS all happened! Series!

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
58. Awesome!
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 08:38 PM
Mar 2016

That has what to do with the topic?

Are you pushing the shill gambit?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024512365#post5

You do realize that is just plain creepy. Just because it's not a supposed obscenity, doesn't mean that's not the full intent.

U4ikLefty

(4,012 posts)
68. Already back to the third grade ROFL smileys? You must be out of bullets.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 09:11 PM
Mar 2016

I'm already bored with your tired schtick. So you're getting the Batman treatment again.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027419447#post56

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
69. That's so cute.
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 09:28 PM
Mar 2016

Didn't you just offer up a classic childhood comment about a mirror?

Oh, goodness.

Why do hate laughter? Oh, you're not trying to make me laugh?

Well...

Do you have anything to add to the discussion?

Do you think deceitful memes are ethical?

BTW, thanks for the kicks.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
75. Wow -- it seems like your main interest in life is
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 11:59 PM
Mar 2016

promoting fictions and pseudoscience. How sad is that!

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
83. Hey, what do you think about anti-GMO memes that are this deceitful?
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 10:36 PM
Mar 2016

Are you cool with such silliness?

Really?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Do Organic Growers Use ‘H...