Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 04:34 PM Feb 2016

NY Bishop Rape Shames Abuse Victims: Boys Are ‘Culpable’ For Their Actions At 7 Years Old

http://churchandstate.org.uk/2015/09/ny-bishop-rape-shames-abuse-victims/

Bishop Robert Cunningham of the diocese of Syracuse, NY doesn’t think priests should take all of the blame for decades, if not centuries, of sexual abuse against young boys. According to Cunningham, the “age of reason” in the Catholic church is seven, so those boys are culpable for their actions.

The shocking statement came during testimony that was recently released from a deposition for a federal lawsuit. Charles Bailey, a survivor of a priest’s abuse, asked then-Bishop James Moynihan whether the church held children victims partly responsible for sexual abuse from priests . “(Bishop) Moynihan said that right to my face – ‘The age of reason is 7, so if you’re at least 7 you’re culpable for your actions.’ That kind of floored me,” said Bailey.

Obviously, the sentiment isn’t something one Bishop believes, but a broader excuse used to cover for the guilt of sexual predators.

The “age of reason” may be seven years old, but that in no way makes it the “age it’s the kid’s fault he was raped.” According to church doctrine, seven is the age a child should understand the difference between right and wrong. It’s also the age a child is eligible for communion.


36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NY Bishop Rape Shames Abuse Victims: Boys Are ‘Culpable’ For Their Actions At 7 Years Old (Original Post) KamaAina Feb 2016 OP
and this is why I left the cult -eom dragonfly301 Feb 2016 #1
+1. Also, it sheds an interesting light on Sinead O'Connor's closeupready Feb 2016 #7
Me too. Throckmorton Feb 2016 #16
Sicko. Needs to go to prison. boston bean Feb 2016 #2
Now if only everyone who blames children for their own rape were so judged... Major Nikon Feb 2016 #4
Did she also say, "She's a witch!!!" longship Feb 2016 #8
No, but she did just basically say the child was asking for it Major Nikon Feb 2016 #9
Alerting would be insufficient on the venomous libel you The Second Stone Mar 2016 #23
Libel does not mean what you think it means Major Nikon Mar 2016 #25
I practice defamation law, I won't be taking lessons from someone The Second Stone Mar 2016 #31
I think you need more practice Major Nikon Mar 2016 #32
Your red phone is to the red guy with the pitchfork The Second Stone Mar 2016 #33
He's on there too as is the pope Major Nikon Mar 2016 #34
Apparently Nikon hit a sore spot Lordquinton Feb 2016 #14
Any dose of reality about the anointed one seems to do that Major Nikon Mar 2016 #26
I don't support Hillary Clinton 1939 Mar 2016 #29
I understand others do it Major Nikon Mar 2016 #30
I can't help but wonder how many kids Cunningham has raped. Solly Mack Feb 2016 #3
But any criticism of this organization here is met with shouts of outrage and cries of love for the Bluenorthwest Feb 2016 #5
There are many who attempt to deflect in a very dishonest way. trotsky Feb 2016 #15
Link to change.org petition to Pope Francis asking for his removal. That Guy 888 Feb 2016 #6
As a lapsed Catholic I signed it gladly. bklyncowgirl Mar 2016 #36
Ah, more moral clarity from the Vatican Warren DeMontague Feb 2016 #10
Ugh Liberal_in_LA Feb 2016 #11
Disgusting, disgusting pig. n/t prayin4rain Feb 2016 #12
"The altar-boy led me on!" Nye Bevan Feb 2016 #13
At what age does a priest become culpable? n/t BlueSpot Feb 2016 #17
As always, The Onion foresaw this, way back in 2002 Orrex Feb 2016 #18
Disgusting person. kairos12 Mar 2016 #19
Those seven year old boys and their flirty ways Monk06 Mar 2016 #20
One sick religous pos rockfordfile Mar 2016 #21
FYI, that's legal doctrine in most states Nevernose Mar 2016 #22
Disgusting. (n/t) xenoturkey Mar 2016 #24
_Spotlight_ just won the best picture Oscar, he should go see it. n/t PoliticAverse Mar 2016 #27
Religion is problematic, Catholic Church is a crime. randys1 Mar 2016 #28
How the fuck does this church still have members? Initech Mar 2016 #35
 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
7. +1. Also, it sheds an interesting light on Sinead O'Connor's
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 05:16 PM
Feb 2016

infamous act during her SNL performance back in the 90's.

That is, maybe now we kind of know what she was trying to say.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
4. Now if only everyone who blames children for their own rape were so judged...
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 04:53 PM
Feb 2016
“I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing,” Clinton, then named Hillary D. Rodham, wrote in the affidavit. “I have also been informed that she has in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body. Also that she exhibits an unusual stubbornness and temper when she does not get her way.”

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/06/20/exclusive-hillary-clinton-took-me-through-hell-rape-victim-says.html

longship

(40,416 posts)
8. Did she also say, "She's a witch!!!"
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 05:54 PM
Feb 2016

The only thing left is, "The complainant turned me into a newt! ... I got better."

No satire or agreement here. Just an appropriate response from just about any perspective. However, the extent that somebody would take such a position is the extent that the person HAS NO SOUL!

Just saying.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
9. No, but she did just basically say the child was asking for it
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 07:43 PM
Feb 2016

I just think it's very telling how the HRC fan base is strangely silent on this bit of history. If they say anything at all it's usually something along the lines of how she was just doing her job as a lawyer, which doesn't seem like much of an excuse for such morally reprehensible victim blaming, but even if it were the same would seem to apply to an agent of the RCC defending the RCC.

If nothing else it's a good case study on how the double standard works.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
25. Libel does not mean what you think it means
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 10:46 AM
Mar 2016
“I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing,” Clinton, then named Hillary D. Rodham, wrote in the affidavit. “I have also been informed that she has in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body. Also that she exhibits an unusual stubbornness and temper when she does not get her way.”

 

The Second Stone

(2,900 posts)
31. I practice defamation law, I won't be taking lessons from someone
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 01:01 PM
Mar 2016

who recklessly flings insults to damage people's reputations. That's the nasty kind of socialist.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
32. I think you need more practice
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 01:06 PM
Mar 2016

I have a red phone directly to the almighty and He isn't convinced of your flagrantly laughable allegations of libel either.

Lordquinton

(7,886 posts)
14. Apparently Nikon hit a sore spot
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 09:38 PM
Feb 2016

Claiming that the child seduced the adult is not OK in any context.

1939

(1,683 posts)
29. I don't support Hillary Clinton
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 11:00 AM
Mar 2016

but this is what defense lawyers do in our legal system. They muddle, confuse, and obstruct the prosecution if they have a guilty client. If their client is accused of rape, they attack the credibility ogf the main prosecution witness which is usually the victim.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
30. I understand others do it
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 11:31 AM
Mar 2016

The question is whether or not it's ethical. Contributory negligence is a defense often used in tort cases, but the use of it in criminal cases is actually pretty controversial even among lawyers and was so even back in in the 70's. This is not what all defense lawyers who represent alleged rapists do in our legal system, even with adult victims, much less children. There is simply no reality I can imagine where contributory negligence is any sort of an ethical defense when a 12 yr old has been raped. Furthermore if the "I was just doing my job" excuse were actually valid, then it would also have to apply to an agent of the church defending the church. Either both of those things are wrong, or they are both right. I'm of the opinion that they are both wrong.

Solly Mack

(90,775 posts)
3. I can't help but wonder how many kids Cunningham has raped.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 04:44 PM
Feb 2016

No doubt he would see it as the child seducing him into sin.



 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
5. But any criticism of this organization here is met with shouts of outrage and cries of love for the
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 05:03 PM
Feb 2016

all male clergy.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
15. There are many who attempt to deflect in a very dishonest way.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 12:34 PM
Feb 2016

Namely, that critics of the church's (in)action won't acknowledge pedophilia in other groups of people. But the dishonest part is, I'm not aware of anyone who denies that pedophilia exists in all segments of the population. The thing that's being criticized when it comes to the RCC are aspects such as the one in the OP. That's fucking unique - BLAMING the child? What's also unique is setting up a system that covers up the crimes, shuffles the criminals to new locations with fresh victims, and not doing a damn thing to protect children.

Thankfully one of the most tireless defenders of the RCC here is on a 5-hide vacation for several more weeks.

Monk06

(7,675 posts)
20. Those seven year old boys and their flirty ways
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 01:40 AM
Mar 2016

Reminds me of the judge that called a three year old girl a seductress

Just saying that shit should put you in jail

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
22. FYI, that's legal doctrine in most states
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 02:24 AM
Mar 2016

Technically, whoever is responsible for a child under seven commits whatever crime the child commits (although I've never seen anyone prosecuted for it).

(Not defending pedophiles and their enablers, just making small talk)

Initech

(100,087 posts)
35. How the fuck does this church still have members?
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 09:34 PM
Mar 2016

I mean seriously. This is almost the Catholic equivalent of a "let them eat cake moment".

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NY Bishop Rape Shames Abu...