Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFerguson.....Dios Mio.
Ferguson Digs In Its Heels
Colin Gordon ▪ February 17, 2016
Nineteen months have passed since the death of Michael Brown, and less than a year since the release of the Justice Departments scathing examination of predatory racism in the Ferguson Police Department. The problemamply documented by Justice, as well as local groups Arch City Defenders and Better Together St. Louiswas not just the starkly disproportionate impact of local courts on African Americans, but the ways in which Ferguson and other St. Louis County municipalities relied on fines and forfeitures as a source of revenue. The residents of Ferguson do not have a police problem, as Ta-Nehisi Coates summed it up last year, They have a gang problem. That the gang operates under legal sanction makes no difference. It is a gang nonetheless, and there is no other word to describe an armed band of collection agents.
The political response was slow but meaningful. Missouri Senate Bill 5, signed by Governor Nixon in July, introduced a spate of reforms, including a cap on court fines as a share of municipal revenues. Negotiations between Ferguson and the Justice Department proceeded fitfully, slowed by the citys fiscal anxieties (We feel that what they are asking would financially ruin the city, as one city councilor complained just before the anniversary of Browns death). In January, Ferguson officials finally agreed to a settlement that would bolster community policing and meet the modest expectation that municipal code enforcement be animated by a concern for public safety rather than the citys budget.
Last week, that deal crumbled. To the palpable dismay of community members in attendance, the Ferguson city council amended the consent decree, most notably pulling back on commitments to raise police salaries and asserting that the terms of the deal would not apply to outside agencies if the city decided to contract out policing or collections. The Justice Department wasted no time filing suit, citing the citys routine violation of constitutional and statutory rights, based in part on prioritizing the misuse of law enforcement authority as a means to generate municipal revenue over legitimate law enforcement purposes, and the unlikelihood that that the City will remedy these patterns and practices of unlawful conduct absent judicial mandate.
It is a distressing turn of events. Fergusons petulant retreat is certainly animated in part by uneven citizenship that prevails in North St. Louis County, by which local authorities (as the Justice report concluded) see some residents, especially those who live in Fergusons predominantly African-American neighborhoods, less as constituents to be protected than as potential offenders. But it is also animated by mundane budgetary anxieties, by a fiscal desperation that pressed the Ferguson policeunder clear and unambiguous direction from city officialsto also see those offenders as sources of revenue. How did it come to this? ....................(more)
https://www.dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/ferguson-justice-department-consent-degree-standoff
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 918 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post