Debbie Wasserman Schultz questioned about supporting Hillary

[snooper2]

[scscholar]

1. Why shouldn't the head of the party...

support the best hope of the party for winning election? The complaint is illogical.

[snooper2]

3. You should actually watch the interview

[scscholar]

5. I live in Seattle...

and thus don't have a fast enough connection for that YouTube site.

[snooper2]

7. Don't worry well get fiber out there someday LOL

[roguevalley]

8. some people don't know how this is supposed to work. DNC is supposed to be

neutral but since its now a money laundering operation for HRC I suppose you might be confused. THat's why they don't get a penny of my money. There's nothing like giving up even the PRETENSE of needing voters. Money talking to money about money. Our new overlords.

[hollysmom]

6. that would be assuming they knew who would be best and the rest of us should be ignored.

should not the head of the party represent the people in the party? Or are we just chopped liver?
Of course that might mean the heads of the unions actually had to represent the members and taht does nto appear to be happening either. boy things sure have changed since I was in a union.

[nashville_brook]

2. DWS trying to match wits with a rubber puppet is priceless.

[joeybee12]

4. GDP...and since Hillary is the only dem in the race now...

Why wouldn't she support her?

[Fla Dem]

9. Results of an alert on your post!

On Wed Feb 24, 2016, 03:34 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

GDP...and since Hillary is the only dem in the race now...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=7635727

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Claims that Hillary is the "only dem in the race" which equals a claim that Bernie is not a Democrat.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Feb 24, 2016, 03:40 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Oh, ffs. Compared to the things that are said about the Clintons, this is nothing. Less than nothing, really.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Really! Tame compared to other really negative posts.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: mild - hurt feelings are not justification for an alert
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given

[joeybee12]

10. Hee-hee

Thanks.