'If we are going to nominate someone who 50% of our people can't stand,

[elleng]

we are going to lose.'

Marco Rubio

[LiberalElite]

1. hmm. nt

[7wo7rees]

2. Hmmmm? nt

[FreakinDJ]

3. BINGO

[elleng]

4. Yup, BINGO

BINGO X2!

[Hortensis]

16. :) Bingo.

It'll be nice when the general election rules kick in.

[Depaysement]

5. Hillarious-> nt

[Logical]

6. LOL, I see what you did there! :-)

[elleng]

7. I 'published' what he said in AN appropriate spot,

figuring everyone could read it and understand its full meaning. Glad you 'see.'

[TDale313]

8. He's got a point. n/t

[elleng]

10. Sure has.

[hollysmom]

9. werll I can't stand someone who doesn't show up for their job and expects to get paid.

[world wide wally]

11. Yeah, but he only said it one time

[panader0]

12. Or trust: Rubio scores higher than:

[Hydra]

14. I can't believe anyone from the clown car scores below 50% on the not honest scale

Kinda surprised Trump scores so badly...maybe he gets the full 33% as his voting block?

[hifiguy]

17. i've seen numbers like that before - Richard Nixon's not long after the Saturday Night Massacre

Herself completely alienates the left//liberal base who are already sick to fucking death of voting for the lesser of two evils. Has zero appeal to independents and the disaffected. On top of that, the Repig cave-orc base will do everything short of coming out of graves just to vote against her. She's worth an additional 2-3 million votes for Repigs nationwide.

Hindenburg/Titanic scale disaster awaits with Herself at the top of the ticket. And when she goes down in flames, the left will be blamed and the party winched ever further to the right by the billionaires, banksters, and the MIC.

Make book on it.

Bernie or Bust.

[Doctor_J]

13. And what if...