Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 01:36 PM Feb 2016

It's Time To Kill The $100 Bill; It's Time To Go After Big Money

By Lawrence H. Summers February 16 at 7:00 AM

Harvard's Mossavar Rahmani Center for Business and Government, which I am privileged to direct, has just issued an important paper by senior fellow Peter Sands and a group of student collaborators. The paper makes a compelling case for stopping the issuance of high denomination notes like the 500 euro note and $100 bill or even withdrawing them from circulation.

I remember that when the euro was being designed in the late 1990s, I argued with my European G7 colleagues that skirmishing over seigniorage by issuing a 500 euro note was highly irresponsible and mostly would be a boon to corruption and crime. Since the crime and corruption in significant part would happen outside European borders, I suggested that, to paraphrase John Connally, it was their currency, but would be everyone’s problem. And I made clear that in the context of an international agreement, the U.S. would consider policy regarding the $100 bill. But because the Germans were committed to having a high denomination note, the issue was never seriously debated in international forums.

The fact that — as Sands points out — in certain circles the 500 euro note is known as the “Bin Laden” confirms the arguments against it. Sands’ extensive analysis is totally convincing on the linkage between high denomination notes and crime. He is surely right that illicit activities are facilitated when a million dollars weighs 2.2 pounds as with the 500 euro note rather than more than 50 pounds as would be the case if the $20 bill was the high denomination note. And he is equally correct in arguing that technology is obviating whatever need there may ever have been for high denomination notes in legal commerce.

What should happen next? I’d guess the idea of removing existing notes is a step too far. But a moratorium on printing new high denomination notes would make the world a better place. In terms of unilateral steps, the most important actor by far is the European Union. The €500 is almost six times as valuable as the $100. Some actors in Europe, notably the European Commission, have shown sympathy for the idea and European Central Bank chief Mario Draghi has shown interest as well. If Europe moved, pressure could likely be brought on others, notably Switzerland.

more...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/02/16/its-time-to-kill-the-100-bill/

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's Time To Kill The $100 Bill; It's Time To Go After Big Money (Original Post) Purveyor Feb 2016 OP
The problem with cash, from a bankers standpoint, is bankers don't get a cut... PoliticAverse Feb 2016 #1
Yep. GoneFishin Feb 2016 #4
Once a week until it takes hold I guess. It's a BAD idea. Ban diamonds, gold, bonds too? LINKS Festivito Feb 2016 #2
Summers is a douchebag. roamer65 Feb 2016 #3
What are the people who use cash to pay for things supposed to do? Carry a whole bunch shraby Feb 2016 #5
Or maybe something like this? Wednesdays Feb 2016 #6
They want to get rid of cash because coyote Feb 2016 #7
This lapfog_1 Feb 2016 #8
$100 is about the same as a $20 when I was young unc70 Feb 2016 #9
I spent 12 100 dollar bills on a new GSD this weekend. ileus Feb 2016 #10

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
1. The problem with cash, from a bankers standpoint, is bankers don't get a cut...
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 01:48 PM
Feb 2016

when you spend it or receive it. By eliminating cash bankers can get a cut of all transactions
like they get now when people pay with credit cards instead of cash.

Festivito

(13,452 posts)
2. Once a week until it takes hold I guess. It's a BAD idea. Ban diamonds, gold, bonds too? LINKS
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 01:50 PM
Feb 2016

From a week ago:
It’s Official: Cash is Now Public Enemy Number One
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1116&pid=76368

Shamelessly. My post:
...Me thinks, because, people could not possibly use diamonds, gold, bearer bonds, etc.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1116&pid=76375

DU dual post from today:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1116&pid=76517

shraby

(21,946 posts)
5. What are the people who use cash to pay for things supposed to do? Carry a whole bunch
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 01:57 PM
Feb 2016

of singles, fives. tens or twenties around in their wallets? That makes for a thick wallet, that's for sure.

 

coyote

(1,561 posts)
7. They want to get rid of cash because
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 02:06 PM
Feb 2016

they are introducing negative interest rates and there is no way to devalue cash unless you outlaw it. It´s a matter of time before they try to wipe it out. Its already starting the EU with the elimination of the 500 € and limits on cash transactions. Negative interest rates (NIRP) are coming.

unc70

(6,121 posts)
9. $100 is about the same as a $20 when I was young
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 02:43 PM
Feb 2016

And I think we still had larger denominations back then. I can remember when many places would not take $100 bills. Now every grocery register is full of them. Stupid idea to ban them.

ileus

(15,396 posts)
10. I spent 12 100 dollar bills on a new GSD this weekend.
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 02:50 PM
Feb 2016

8 hours of total driving and 1200 bucks later and we had a new member of the family.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It's Time To Kill The $10...