Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 06:12 PM Feb 2016

Some history of the Supreme Court

I admit to a certain curiosity about history, and a certain bias towards facts.

In an attempt to find some, I turn to my copy of the Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court, which I sometimes scan. Concerning nominations it says

"From 1789 to mid 1992 the U.S. Senate has rejected 28 of the 143 nominees forwarded to it by presidents. (Eleven were not rejected per se but were simply not acted upon.)" p 692

Only five of those have been in the 20th century. Four of them the appointees of Republican Presidents. One by Hoover, two by Nixon and Robert Bork. Douglas Ginsburg was shot down before he was appointed by Reagan.

The other one was Chief Justice Earl Warren retired in June of 1968, but Republicans prevented the nomination of Abe Fortas because they expected to win the election. In that case though, there was not a vacancy of the court since Warren just stayed on.

There have been various periods when there were NOT 9 Supreme Court justices, the longest of which in recent history was 391 days from 14 May 1969 when Fortas was 'forced' to resign after a Life magazine story from 5 May until he was replaced by Harry Blackmun on 9 Jun 1970. That delay happened because not one, but TWO nominees were rejected by the Senate 45-55 and 45-51.

There were two delays of over 900 days in the 1840s and 1860s (because apparently two other justices died before the first one was replaced and it took multiple years before they were all replaced.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Some history of the Supreme Court (Original Post) hfojvt Feb 2016 OP
Scalia died at the worst possible time for the GOP. Rex Feb 2016 #1
I hope that is true hfojvt Feb 2016 #2
If Obama wants to have his nominee actually confirmed TeddyR Feb 2016 #3
 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
1. Scalia died at the worst possible time for the GOP.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 06:15 PM
Feb 2016

They now have to pretend outrage for 300 days and the electorate will not look kindly on them. A win win for dems.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
2. I hope that is true
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 06:36 PM
Feb 2016

Seems to me like the worst possible time for us. The Republicans can delay while their base gets fired up to vote to prevent the court from becoming liberal.

In some ways though I expect Obama to appoint a right-leaning moderate, and have liberals screaming at him.

But we will see. Time will tell.

 

TeddyR

(2,493 posts)
3. If Obama wants to have his nominee actually confirmed
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 08:07 PM
Feb 2016

Then that person will have to be a moderate at the least. And I don't get the sense that Obama would shy away from appointing a moderate. And I agree - a Supreme Court vacancy seems like more of a rallying point for the right than the left.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Some history of the Supre...