General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumspintobean
(18,101 posts)and my condolences for the loss of her friend.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Please realize, two people can be polar opposites in their legal opinions and yet still be the best of friends.
Notorious RBG has been deeply pained by the passing of one of the dearest friends she ever made during her life. Please respect that pain. I know I do.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)nichomachus
(12,754 posts)So she can be magnanimous. But this is typical in DC.
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)or who are not black youth being killed by guns and murderous cops can laugh along with the treacherous scalia.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)... people like Scalia are actively harmful. It isn't just a matter of opinion we're talking about. That man was in a position to actively harm people in this country, and he took every opportunity to do so. How she could be friends with that shitstain is beyond me.
Good-fucking-Riddance.
BuddhaGirl
(3,608 posts)"It's a very important thing to learn to talk to people you disagree with" -- Pete Seeger (1919-2014)
It may seem impossible to some, but it really IS possible to be friends with someone who is your ideological opposite.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)I could not be friends with someone I viewed as doing major evil.
Not possible for me. It's like when I hear that some celebrity that I like is a conservative repug, I cross them off my list because I know what that party stands for and the hurt it has done to the country and my people.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)Me neither. How could she? I must admit I do NOT get it. And it kind of lowers my opinion of her--was she really so liberal? Or was it the liberal part that made her put up with him, out of general tolerance and judicial comraderie and all that? DC two-faced getalong?
Ugh. He reminds me of some relatives of mine I DO NOT make time for. And that has been by far the best solution.
liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)He was a scumbag, not a good person. But they are not responsible for his actions. And I'm sure regardless they loved him. I'm not the type that says you shouldn't speak ill of the dead. If they were a bad person, then their death doesn't change that. But my philosophy is that you can "speak ill of the dead." but show some decency. Don't dance on their grave.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)And I'm betting she would be appalled at the grave dancing. I know I am.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)sus453
(164 posts)too. I find what he stood for to be lower than low, the worst. But he was a human being like all the rest of us, anf it's the end of a life; so to me it seems sort of low class to dance on anyone's grave.
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)scalia enabled bush to steal the white house.
scalia wanted to take health care away from American citizens.
he believes that corporations are people so that American elections can be bought.
- better to be a grave dancer that the grave maker or those who enable grave makers.
cstanleytech
(26,293 posts)not that I agree with him on that nor do I agree with him on the majority of his opinions.
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)he also believes that corporations are people and that the rich should have a freer voice than the poor.
liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)I respect Ruth. But I also have sympathy for Scalias family. They were victims of the loss of a love one. Whether he was a bad person or not. Celebrating death is something I wouldn't put past the rwers, but DUers? Come on guys! These past few days have been disappointing.
7962
(11,841 posts)But you know the answer, "But he really WAS a bad guy" so that makes it ok
liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)I think there are a lot of hypocrites around here.
How many OPs have I seen where "Have you read the comments to this story? Disgusting!!" is repeated by many. And yet we see the same crass crap from a lot of folks right here.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Instead, he decided to shit on people in my family.
If he had retired, I wouldn't give a shit about him dying.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)If people thought she was a DU member or even a browser, I suspect the tone here would have been far different.
I personally don't care for grave dancing. It makes me think of Hillary laughing about leaders we've killed. It's not becoming on her or anyone. Although I have to admit I laughed at a few of the funnier comments posted by comedians here.
Death isn't funny, no matter who it is. But, I can understand it. He did a lot of harm to this country, despite Ginsburg's feelings for him.
It is a relief that he is gone, but I was immediately saddened for Ginsburg upon hearing of his death, because I know how close they were.
Logical
(22,457 posts)Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)So I'm having a hard time giving a fuck what his friends have to say about him.
Marr
(20,317 posts)He was so very put-upon.
Ruth Bader Ginsberg knew Scalia personally. Most knew him only from the far-right decisions he made, and the personal indignities they felt in their own lives as direct a result. You defend that bigoted pig's memory if you like. I will not.
KentuckyWoman
(6,685 posts)rec.
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)I posted this LA Times article from last summer in a separate thread, but it seems appropriate here:
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-court-odd-couple-20150622-story.html
Despite their standing as the intellectual lions of the left and right, Ginsburg and Scalia have forged an uncommon bond on a court where close friendships outside of chambers are rare.
Their areas of agreement may be few which is likely to be the case this month when the justices decide whether gay and lesbian couples have a right to marry but they maintain a tone of respect.
Scalia, 79, and Ginsburg, 82, frequently dine and vacation together. Every Dec. 31, they ring in the new year together. Their relationship has even inspired an opera, set to debut this summer.
silverweb
(16,402 posts)Glorfindel
(9,730 posts)I'm sorry she lost her friend.
brer cat
(24,575 posts)shenmue
(38,506 posts)MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)I'm not happy with her at all.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)Chakab
(1,727 posts)to turn the US into some sort of theocracy based on his Catholic beliefs because they had nice conversations at dinner.
The man was a piece of shit who was actively working along side those four other assholes on the Court to roll back every advance that has been made on social issues in the US for the past half century.
Sorry, if you don't understand the reaction to Scalia's death because you likely aren't a member of a group that has been actively targeted by his rulings, but I am, and I feel entitled to do as much grave dancing as I want, irrespective of whatever the fuck the RBG and the morality police here on DU have to say about it.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)Hatred is a wasted emotion, IMO, and burns you out, I can say that from experience.
The day I let my hatred go was the day I found peace and serenity in my life.
Chakab
(1,727 posts)who wants to knock me down and kick my teeth out. I'm going to punch back.
good luck with that hatred, sooner or later, it will burn you out, I just hope you let it go before it does burn you out.
That said, Peace to you and yours.
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)but imagine away.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)...whose privilege insulates them from the impact of their "differences of opinion".
Nobody in Ginsburgs family is an African American voter in Texas.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Just like the parties, one has no class or taste and the other does.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)and don't pay attention to the haters here.
RIP Mr. Scalia and cross gently.
Condolences to his wife and children.
mountain grammy
(26,623 posts)The posters here are his victims. We are all his victims. Do I hate someone who can and does harm the general population? Guilty. But the real hater is dead and soon buried.
Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)and the people here hate us for hating, yet feel nothing but love for the guy who enabled and wanted Americans to die without healthcare and felt it was okay to steal the election for bush.
what is wrong with people?
Trump is the only one who publically called out the murderous and incompetent bushes for letting 911 happen and making up lies for invading Iraq. When I've pointed this out I've gotten scolded by the same 'poor scalia' type crap.
this really turns me off our side.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)Expressing condolences to him and his family is expressing love for him?
What a ridiculous statement.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)I, OTOH, refuse to let the hatred into my heart.
Peace to you and yours.
Hate is a most destructive emotion.
mountain grammy
(26,623 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)...who, to the end, wanted them locked up.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)spanone
(135,844 posts)both of them knew a time when politics were somewhat civil.
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)what kind of world do people make up?
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]A 90% chance of rain means the same as a 10% chance:
It might rain and it might not.[/center][/font][hr]
mcar
(42,334 posts)Pure class
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)has had an enormous impact on the country, just because she was good friends with Scalia, you now don't like her?
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)had. I'm sure kim jong un is great with a friend or two or funny, but I don't think his horrible actions can be overlooked.
oh - and scalia of course stole an American election for bush while claiming to be a 'great American'.
The hypocrisy is unrelenting and disgusting.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)Perhaps they held each other up. He might have been there for her when she lost her husband. She loved Italian opera and perhaps he did too. They lived in a little shell of a world but had to rely on one another for some strength and tenacity. She never deserted her liberal beliefs, tho, despite their friendship. So what's the big deal...
Beartracks
(12,816 posts)Excellent point.
I know many here at DU have no need for religion, but some of the basic precepts, like the Golden Rule and "love thy enemies as yourself" are hallmarks of magnanimity, generosity of spirit, and, frankly, liberalism.
To now "hate" Ginsburg because she happened to find something worthy of kindness and friendship even inside of a hateful man such as Scalia is just wrong.
Come on -- Luke could sense some good in Darth Vader, Jesus loved sinners, and Ginsburg found something to like even about Scalia. She knew him beyond the public persona and the court decisions and the legal philosophies -- which is to say, she knew him on a level far closer than anyone at DU can ever claim. No one here has a right to judge her.
====================
Hekate
(90,714 posts)....and on its worst days, that in even our friends.
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)or stealing an American election. That was scalia.
FourScore
(9,704 posts)Such a friendship is rare and wonderful. However, I do not care at all for Scalia's court decisions. He may have had all these wonderful attributes as a person, but the end result of his work was detrimental to so many. To say so is not to grave-dance. It is simply stating a fact. Having said that, my heart goes out to RBG and Scalia's family and friends who are experiencing a terrible personal loss.
lark
(23,105 posts)Scalia was an ass, but guess he was an affable and smart ass so she put the very best spin possible on his passing. it would be rude to point out that he was a politically driven jurist who truly cared nothing about the constitution except when he would use it to his own political advantage. When it was inconvenient, it was totally ignored. He was not consistent, he was a RW jerk.
1939
(1,683 posts)if Ginsburg was the first to pass that Scalia would have been equally as classy. When you have class, you do not allow policy differences to obstruct.
My closest freint in my old age, an old friend from Vietnam, is somewhat to the right of Louis the IV. He refers to the president as "that marxist thug". He is still my friend as our shared experiences overweigh our political difference.
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)This is a very good example.
The damage done by fat tony will hurt American for generations. Any support for him is support for the damage done and yet to be done.
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)Obviously. And she proves, yet again, that she is a better person than most. We are lucky to have her on the bench.
Maru Kitteh
(28,340 posts)to hurt, to impede the natural course of simple human progress and well-being.
So on his grave I dance.
I cannot imagine what her solace may be, but I hope she finds it and her pain is eased soon. She is a remarkable person.
24601
(3,962 posts)defer to her judgment as it's based on on 1st hand experience. If anyone chooses to not trust her judgment, fine. But I do.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)No matter how good a companion he was, his actions were evil.
former9thward
(32,019 posts)I took a summer course that he taught 8 years ago. In person he was very funny and personable. At the end of the course he took 3 of us out for dinner at an Italian restaurant in Arlington, VA where he talked to us about the inner court workings.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)I'm sure it was because you are such a massive bleeding liberal, as you display in every single post on this board!
former9thward
(32,019 posts)He didn't know anyone's politics in the class. Why would any SC Justice care what a lowly law student thinks? I guarantee none of them do. You have very distorted view of the world if you think that stuff matters. Any law school student would go to dinner with any SC Justice no matter who they were. #liveintherealworld.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Although we'll never be invited, I'm glad that they enjoy their membership.
I'm sure his death was a loss to his friends and family. Luckily, I'm neither.
BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)Really.
Jake Stern
(3,145 posts)she has the luxury of not being impacted by the decisions in which he was with the majority.
I am not so blessed. Neither are millions like me.
He voted to deny me the health coverage (expanded medicaid) that has allowed me to seek timely medical attention without having to choose between health care and bills.
He voted to give corporations more of a voice in government than me.
He voted to deny my brother the right to marry the man he loves.
He voted to allow corporations to deny contraception coverage forcing my niece to pay out of pocket for something her insurance should cover.
Choose to dance on his grave because I have seen the real effects those votes had.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Some people got opera tickets.
Others were executed.
Oh well, just differences of opinion.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)What good does hate do? Nada.
Change is what matters.
I have a couple of dear friends who hold truly appalling viewpoints.
Do you think I'll make the world a better place by rejecting them?
On the contrary, I'll only add fuel to their tragically misguided fire.
I try very hard to convey my views by what I do, not what I say.
I think in at least one or two cases that I'm making progress.
"Love is the only answer, hate is the root of cancer then."
libodem
(19,288 posts)For her to resign next year and give Bernie a chance to nominate Barack.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)littlemissmartypants
(22,691 posts)7962
(11,841 posts)Those who celebrate the death of someone who SOMETIMES made court decisions they didnt like.
Most must not realize that the majority of SCOTUS decisions are not 5-4. As a matter of fact, many more were 9-0 than 5-4.
These grave dancers have no standing to post stories or statements about how "heartless" or "cruel" the GOP is when one of THEIR members says something insulting
I cant think of anyone I dislike (who isnt a terrorist or something like that) more than Dick Cheney. But I dont wish that his heart would explode like I've seen so many times here in reference to scalia.
RandiFan1290
(6,237 posts)Maybe you can find a 'safe space?'
7962
(11,841 posts)We have a LOT of hypocrites here. And so many of them are too bitter to even see it in themselves.
I imagine we wont see any posts from you criticizing the right when they say stupid things.
When RBG passes on, how quick will we see OPs bemoaning the grave dancing from the right?
As several above have stated, I thought DU was supposed to be better than that.
RandiFan1290
(6,237 posts)Might want to take a break if DU bothers you so much
7962
(11,841 posts)No better than those on the right, obviously.
RandiFan1290
(6,237 posts)You know that is what REALLY bothers you
former9thward
(32,019 posts)Obama gets to nominate a successor to Scalia. He does not get to replace him. What happens to the nomination is up to the Senate.
7962
(11,841 posts)Quite a stretch to equate being critical of people celebrating the death of a Justice to being bothered by who gets to pick a replacement.
Guess thats why I didnt say anything of the sort.
prayin4rain
(2,065 posts)thought they were the correct legal opinions, not because they were his personal beliefs?
SHRED
(28,136 posts)Scalia was horrible.
Kissinger is horrible.