General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumshey media, there is no 'dispute' over who gets to nominate a supreme court justice or when.
just because the republican party dismisses President Obama, doesn't
change the truth. the President nominates a supreme court justice. period.
the american people have spoken and President Obama is the President.
randys1
(16,286 posts)SNL had a great video last night about Beyonce being Black, who knew
white people go crazy when they find out
Jenny_92808
(1,342 posts)Would you please provide a link because I would enjoy watching it.
herding cats
(19,565 posts)L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)herding cats
(19,565 posts)My tablet was getting all weird about letting me just link to the video.
randys1
(16,286 posts)malaise
(269,054 posts)Senator Warren said in a statement, "Senator McConnell is right that the American people should have a voice in the selection of the next Supreme Court justice. In fact, they did - when President Obama won the 2012 election by five million votes."
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)Article II
Section 1.
The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. ....
Section 2.
The President shall be commander in chief .....
He shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States, whose appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by law: but the Congress may by law vest the appointment of such inferior officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the courts of law, or in the heads of departments.
The President shall have power to fill up all vacancies that may happen during the recess of the Senate, by granting commissions which shall expire at the end of their next session.
spanone
(135,844 posts)will repeat ad nauseum.
they believe in the motto: "If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes true"
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)The last thing they want is for the dialogue to be about women's rights, abortion, all their losing single issues that so clearly determine voting.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)there are pro forma sessions scheduled.
Orrex
(63,216 posts)As in "The President appoints so-and-so to the Supreme Court."
Of course, anyone with a pulse knows that's not the case, but they're not the target audience. However, referring to it as "appointing" a justice, the media can then frame it as a direct confrontation between the President & the Congress, in which they portray the Congress as defying the President's will (for good or bad).
steve2470
(37,457 posts)It's not debatable whatsoever. True FearUncertaintyDoubt (FUD) in the political dialogue.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)What a lot of bs.
spanone
(135,844 posts)p.s. he's not popular with the wingnuts