Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSen. Mitch McConnell in 2005: 'The President, and the President alone, nominates judges'
Sen. Mitch McConnell, in 2005, defending the absolute right of a sitting president to nominate judges.
Take it from Sen. Mitch McConnell: for the Senate to block a sitting president from nominating a Supreme Court nomineenot just a specific nominee, mind you, but any nominee at all, would put the Constitution of the United States itself at stake. And he's a patriot, so he would never even consider such a thing.
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/2/13/1484831/-Sen-Mitch-McConnell-in-2005-The-President-and-the-President-alone-nominates-judges
"The Constitution of the United States is at stake. Article II, Section 2 clearly provides that the President, and the President alone, nominates judges. The Senate is empowered to give advice and consent. But my Democratic colleagues want to change the rules. They want to reinterpret the Constitution to require a supermajority for confirmation. In effect, they would take away the power to nominate from the President and grant it to a minority of 41 Senators."
"[T]he Republican conference intends to restore the principle that, regardless of party, any President's judicial nominees, after full debate, deserve a simple up-or-down vote. I know that some of our colleagues wish that restoration of this principle were not required. But it is a measured step that my friends on the other side of the aisle have unfortunately made necessary. For the first time in 214 years, they have changed the Senate's 'advise and consent' responsibilities to 'advise and obstruct.'"
Take it from Sen. Mitch McConnell: for the Senate to block a sitting president from nominating a Supreme Court nomineenot just a specific nominee, mind you, but any nominee at all, would put the Constitution of the United States itself at stake. And he's a patriot, so he would never even consider such a thing.
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/2/13/1484831/-Sen-Mitch-McConnell-in-2005-The-President-and-the-President-alone-nominates-judges
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 851 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sen. Mitch McConnell in 2005: 'The President, and the President alone, nominates judges' (Original Post)
cleanhippie
Feb 2016
OP
That weasel will claim things are now completely different because "Obama...unconstitutional.."
Human101948
Feb 2016
#2
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)1. Nice Research !!!
Human101948
(3,457 posts)2. That weasel will claim things are now completely different because "Obama...unconstitutional.."
Or some such dreck.
DFW
(54,405 posts)3. Didn't McConnell tell you?
He meant to add--"As long as the president is a Republican. Otherwise, my statement is inoperative."
randys1
(16,286 posts)4. Sorry, this is incorrect. He did NOT say this, what he said was
well, let me rephrase it for what he will say now, so to speak
or what he MEANT to say was
"As George W Bush is white, and a republican, he should nominate and we should vote"
underpants
(182,829 posts)5. Spot on
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)6. Good translation.