If The Constitution Is Not a Living Breathing Document

[erpowers]

If the founding fathers did not want the Constitution to be a living breathing document why did they allow for it to be amended. If the men who wrote the original document put forth a way for it to be amended that seems to show they wanted it to be a living breathing document. I assume those men realized the world would change in some way and thought there needed to be a way to meet those changes. Article V of the Constitution says in part, "The Congress, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution".

[Erich Bloodaxe BSN]

1. Look, if it were a 'living breathing' document, the Founders would have made it a corporation.

Cause we all know that corporations are people too, friend.