Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 09:29 PM Feb 2016

New Hampshire Flooded By $100 Million in Political Ads

Money is gushing into New Hampshire as presidential candidates see the first in the nation primary as a make-or-break moment for their campaigns.

About $100 million has already been poured into broadcast and cable television ads courting voters for the Feb. 9 vote, according to estimates from Kantar Media's CMAG and an analysis by Ken Goldstein, a Bloomberg Politics analyst and University of San Francisco professor. In comparison, about $2 million had been spent in New Hampshire by this point in the 2012 race that ultimately came down to Mitt Romney and Barack Obama.

The spending in New Hampshire shows how American politics is being transformed by U.S. Supreme Court decisions in recent years that cleared the path for unbridled spending in elections. The sheer number of candidates and the lack of an incumbent in the race has also intensified the flow of money.

So far, the vast majority of New Hampshire ad spending—about 80 percent as of Feb. 1—has come from the Republican candidates and outside groups supporting them, according to Goldstein. Even Donald Trump, who rode a wave of free publicity through the early months of his campaign, began TV advertising in early January, according to CMAG.

Read the rest at: http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-02-03/new-hampshire-flooded-by-100-million-in-political-ads

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New Hampshire Flooded By $100 Million in Political Ads (Original Post) PoliticAverse Feb 2016 OP
The Gee Oh Pee Three HassleCat Feb 2016 #1
No shit, Sherlock NT 1939 Feb 2016 #2
That's a lot of money nt metroins Feb 2016 #3
I'm so glad I now live in a late primary state with a low population Warpy Feb 2016 #4
I find the amount of money spent on elections to be grotesque. Marrah_G Feb 2016 #5
What? RobertEarl Feb 2016 #6
I agree. bigwillq Feb 2016 #7
The fat cat media moguls are laughing all the way to the bank Brother Buzz Feb 2016 #8
 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
1. The Gee Oh Pee Three
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 09:32 PM
Feb 2016

Trump, Rubio and Cruz all see an opportunity, and they all want to get off to a fast start early in the game.

Warpy

(111,267 posts)
4. I'm so glad I now live in a late primary state with a low population
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 10:36 PM
Feb 2016

The only political ads I'd see around here are on the cable news channels I refuse to watch and on the local network channels that have nothing much on them.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
5. I find the amount of money spent on elections to be grotesque.
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 10:38 PM
Feb 2016

How many people could we house and feed for the amount of money spent on this bullshit?

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
6. What?
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 10:55 PM
Feb 2016

You want them to be taxed more so instead of trying to buy government they end up investing in government?

You must be one of them there socialists?

 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
7. I agree.
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 11:03 PM
Feb 2016

And a reason why I never donate. All these politicans are doing just fine without my money. I already donate enough of my money to this country.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New Hampshire Flooded By ...