General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDon Siegelman Case: Federal judge says jury instructions were totally wrong
and don't exist under actual law.
http://legalschnauzer.blogspot.com/
Monday, February 1, 2016
Former federal prosecutor Stephen Feaga, in a recent op-ed piece for the Montgomery Advertiser, tried to convince the public that jury instructions in the Don Siegelman case were correct. We have shown that Feaga's claim is wildly off target, and a judge who has served on the federal bench in Alabama for 35 years agrees with us.
Myron Thompson, nominated by President Jimmy Carter in 1980, wrote in a 2012 opinion that jury instructions in federal bribery cases long have been filled with murky, inexact, confusing language. Thompson, writing in an opinion for the Alabama bingo trial (U.S. v. Milton E. McGregor, et al), said the problem goes beyond the case that sent Siegelman and codefendant Richard Scrushy to prison. Thompson said federal appellate courts and the U.S. Supreme Court have for years done a poor job of defining the line that marks legal and illegal transactions between public officials and campaign donors.
Thompson offered the jury instructions he crafted for the bingo case, which resulted in zero convictions, as an example of what should be consistently used across the country. Thompson even called on the nation's highest court to clarify the law, perhaps by using his suggested instructions.
It's now roughly three years later, and we've seen no clarity from the U.S. Supreme Court. Meanwhile, Siegelman remains in federal prison for "crimes" that might exist under the flawed jury instructions of former federal judge Mark Fuller--but do not exist under the actual law.
<snip>
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)OldHippieChick
(2,434 posts)Hopefully, this will help immensely.
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)That's a few too many days in jail already. Speaking of which, where's Rove lately?
librechik
(30,674 posts)I f this can't convince people of how crooked and grimy THE ACCEPTED AUTHORITIES are--well nothing will.
we are so screwed.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)1939
(1,683 posts)Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)librechik
(30,674 posts)How about this year, since it can't bite back at you politically (WTF, really???) anymore...
burrowowl
(17,641 posts)why haven't you pardoned him!
gregcrawford
(2,382 posts)... it's that piece of shit, Karl Rove, and anyone else that had a hand in this travesty.
I fuckin' HATE Republicans.
Iwillnevergiveup
(9,298 posts)"false imprisonment" verdict pays victims in Alabama.
midnight
(26,624 posts)"In his federal complaint, Joseph Siegelman states that the DOJ admits in the Conyers letter that several of its officials "acted improperly" in the Don Siegelman case. The complaint goes on to state:
Among those officials was the Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA) in charge of the Siegelman prosecution who communicated directly with the campaign manager of Mr. Siegelmans gubernatorial opponent. The letter discusses an email from the AUSA to the campaign manager informing him that the AUSA and a small group of like-minded conservative prosecutors within the U.S. Attorneys office were pursuing Siegelman.
The identity of the assistant U.S. attorney remains unknown, for now. But the campaign manager in question was identified more than a year ago as Rob Riley. From our original report on the subject:
A federal prosecutor communicated with prominent Alabama Republican Rob Riley during the investigation of former Democratic Governor Don Siegelman, according to a report released yesterday."
http://legalschnauzer.blogspot.com
d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)Inquiring minds wanna know! He's been there too long!