Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLarry Sabato: What We Learned From Iowa
U of VA Center for Politics:1. How real is Trumps support?
It wasnt the night Donald Trump had hoped for. By all accounts, Trump did not have a sophisticated get-out-the-vote machine in Iowa and he did not engage in the tedious, retail campaigning that has defined past Iowa races. That could have cost him the state. Trump was at about 30% in averages of pre-election polls, so he underperformed by about six points. That could be because he did not have the requisite ground game. It also could be because he made a classic frontrunners mistake last week: He played it safe and skipped a debate where he would have been a big target. Instead, he opened the door for another candidate, Marco Rubio, to grab some of his votes.
2. How hard will Sanders make Clinton work?
We could hear the collective exhale from the Clinton camp all over the country. It was a very tight race, yet Hillary Clinton quite narrowly jumped a major hurdle by defeating Bernie Sanders in a state where she finished third in 2008. As weve been suggesting for months, the two leadoff states of Iowa and New Hampshire were tailor-made for Sanders because of their liberal, white electorates Clinton does much better among nonwhite voters. But by holding off Sanders in Iowa, Clinton avoided what could have been an embarrassing 0-2 start in 2016. Even if Sanders wins New Hampshire, as currently expected, Clinton can just write off his victory as a result of regionalism. (Sanders is from neighboring Vermont, and New Hampshire has repeatedly backed candidates in both parties from the Northeast.) As the contest moves to the more diverse states of Nevada and South Carolina, the territory will be friendlier to Clinton. Nonetheless, Sanders has raised loads of small-dollar contributions and has a core of dedicated supporters, so the Democratic race could go on for a while, with Sanders winning here and there, especially in caucus states. However, Clinton remains a huge favorite for the Democratic nomination. Sanders (or any substitute later in the process) cannot defeat her unless scandal knocks Clinton from the race. In that sense, post-Iowa, Clintons real opponent for the party nomination is not Sanders, but the FBI.
3. What is the GOP leadership up to?
The story leading up to Iowa was that the GOP leadership was giving subtle support to Donald Trump because they preferred him over Ted Cruz. Gov. Terry Branstad and Sen. Chuck Grassley both said nice things about Trump in the leadup to the caucuses and bashed Cruz, and the press reported that many high-level members of the party would prefer Trump over Cruz as nominee, even if they preferred other candidates to that pair. But now that Cruz has won, we have to ask is the GOP establishment ever going to get anything they want in this race? One positive sign for Republican leaders is that Marco Rubio had a strong night he actually finished closer to Trump than Trump to Cruz. If Rubio can repeat that in New Hampshire he can start pushing establishment competitors Jeb Bush, Chris Christie, and John Kasich toward the exits.
4. Which candidates are on the chopping block?
We speculated last week that Mike Huckabee and Martin OMalley were not long for this race, and both quickly suspended their campaigns on Monday night. Its only a matter of time for Rick Santorum, who hardly has any money left, based on Federal Election Commission reports. Rand Paul only won about a fifth of the percentage of the vote that his father did four years ago, but he reportedly will fight on at least through New Hampshire. Ben Carson is reportedly not dropping out but is taking a quick (?) break back home in Florida. Carly Fiorina is an afterthought, and Bush, Christie, and Kasich need good showings in New Hampshire after combining for just about 7% of the vote which, combined, is less than Carsons fourth-place showing. Fiorina only got about 2% herself.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 700 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Larry Sabato: What We Learned From Iowa (Original Post)
brooklynite
Feb 2016
OP
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)1. The polling on T-Rump probably overestimates his vote share--his people
are less likely to show up to vote.
The Republicans already have their top 3.