Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAm I the only person who instinctively factorises Jeb! as Jeb*eb*b?
Is anyone else unable to read it without expanding it that way?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1262 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Am I the only person who instinctively factorises Jeb! as Jeb*eb*b? (Original Post)
Donald Ian Rankin
Feb 2016
OP
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,836 posts)1. Jeb factorial?
That would expand him far more than he deserves. I always read Jeb! as a squeaky little yip, like the result of stepping on a chihuahua.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)3. Jeb! = Poppy*W*Jeb
He is the combined product of the whole family.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)2. e is not an integer
As the base of natural logs, you shouldn't be seeing e as an integer.
Jeb! is a poorly formed expression, that I see as Je*b!
Response to Donald Ian Rankin (Original post)
felix_numinous This message was self-deleted by its author.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)5. No matter how you expand it, the result is irrational
surrealAmerican
(11,364 posts)6. You win this thread!
If DUzys still existed, this would be one.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,361 posts)7. And with 'j' in it, it's imaginary, to an engineer (nt)
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)8. good point....
Although as an electrical engineer, I usually take capital J as current density (as in J*B being the electromotive force generated by a current density of J in a magnetic field B).
But, yeah, it's imaginary and irrational, much like Jeb's vanishing support.