Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 10:51 AM Feb 2016

In the United States, The Left is always childish, impractical, ignorant, silly, and unserious.

In the United States, The Left is always childish, impractical, ignorant, silly, and unserious. Liberal solutions to liberal concerns have been taken off the table, replaced at best with conservative solutions to liberal concerns. Serious people know such compromises can get through Congress with a bunch of bipartisanyship, until, as always, Lucy pulls the football away. And even when conservative solutions are proposed (tax credits! insurance exchanges! incentives!), they're a Rube Goldberg mess that people have to fight for constantly.

In the richest country in the world (close enough), life shouldn't be so hard.

http://www.eschatonblog.com/2016/02/the-left.html
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In the United States, The Left is always childish, impractical, ignorant, silly, and unserious. (Original Post) phantom power Feb 2016 OP
"bipartisanyship" ... Best made up word evah! hedda_foil Feb 2016 #1
Seriously did Sarah Palin write that? Initech Feb 2016 #4
maybe the left should look in a mirror hfojvt Feb 2016 #2
"a Democrat from a place like Montana or South Dakota should be more progressive" KamaAina Feb 2016 #3

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
2. maybe the left should look in a mirror
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 01:01 PM
Feb 2016

the left always seems to think that a Democrat from a place like Montana or South Dakota should be more progressive. As if that will not lead to a bunch of Republicans in Congress after the next election. Daschle wasn't good enough. So now we have Thune headed for his third term in a cakewalk (right now he has nobody running against him. Johnson was awful too, of course, but now we have Rounds, so we should be happy to be rid of Johnson.

It's pretty unserious to think that liberal legislation can pass without first electing a whole bunch of liberals.

Considering that it will take Republican votes to pass things, especially now, then unreasonable demands are not likely to fly, any better than pigs will. Consider the minimum wage. We are trying to raise it, what is a serious proposal? $7.75 is pretty reasonable, considering that the real value of the minimum wage in 1997 was $7.61 and in 1983 it was $7.97. As such, it is not even unreasonable to push for $8.25 (and then compromise on $7.75).

$15? No, you are out of your damned mind. That simply is NOT a serious proposal.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
3. "a Democrat from a place like Montana or South Dakota should be more progressive"
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 03:01 PM
Feb 2016

Does the name George McGovern ring a bell?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In the United States, The...