General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsleftynyc
(26,060 posts)in 2008 when Hillary won the most votes in the NV caucus and got less delegates. Screwy rules in caucuses. My mother left the Democratic party because of that NV caucus. Voted for Pres Obama but left the party over the caucus rules.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)the rule might have been misinterpreted.
People are saying that rule 28 of of the Iowa caucus rule actually says that the 'winner' of the coin toss LOSES the delegate.
Say what? This is getting even weirder by the minute.
annabanana
(52,791 posts)but what an odd coda
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)I'd like to see a link to the actual rule itself, right now all I've seen is people saying that the winner of the coin toss is supposed to lose the delegate.
JonathanRackham
(1,604 posts)meow2u3
(24,772 posts)(at about :40)
Ya wanted me to cut the cards, now, didn't ya?
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)'... Note: In a case where two or more preference groups are tied for the loss of a delegate, a coin shall be tossed to determine who loses the delegate.'
I think it's too vague to proclaim 'the winner loses the delegate' even if it's written oddly. I imagine that at the time they flipped the coins, someone probably said 'If it's heads, Hillary loses the delegate, if it's tails, Bernie loses the delegate', and it was tails. So I don't think the rule 28 folks are going to get any real traction, or get anything overturned.
1939
(1,683 posts)but the state party needs to take a hard look at this for the future.