General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBush "Doubts" Sea Level Rise, Admits That He'd Move If He Had To; Invokes Garage-Man To Save Us
EDIT
Bush, once governor of Florida, has said he supports federal government support for basic research into low-carbon energy but, like Rubio, places his faith in the free market to deal with rising temperatures and the extreme weather events, drought and sea level rise they bring.
What we shouldnt try to do is pick winners and losers through the federal government, he said at a gathering in New Hampshire on Saturday, in a newly emerged video.
The market will work faster. Theres someone in a garage somewhere, parochially I hope its in Miami, thats going to have a clue, to have an answer to this. There are people well-intended on climate change but they need to be careful to not paint the apocalypse. Because we are not there. But we should be adapting.
Bush said he doubted sea level predictions for south Florida but, if they did come true, he has told his wife that they should move house.
EDIT
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jan/29/jeb-bush-marco-rubio-climate-change-garage?CMP=share_btn_tw
riversedge
(70,239 posts)CanonRay
(14,103 posts)the Republicans won't believe him because it's science.
n2doc
(47,953 posts)The GOP would be the first to ban it.
CanonRay
(14,103 posts)frizzled
(509 posts)nt
geomon666
(7,512 posts)That was to split the state in half so we could solve our own goddamn problems because people like you are so fucking useless that today we still can't get a single fucking thing done and now it's too late to really do anything about it.
ShrimpPoboy
(301 posts)The financial incentives to do something about climate change don't really exist yet and won't until it's too late. What a stupid, jingoistic response.
geomon666
(7,512 posts)"Somebody somewhere is going to solve the problem so I don't have to. What a great visionary leader I am."
Crock of shit.
hatrack
(59,587 posts)And speaking of thinking (or lack thereof), how about this National Journal article?
It's all about how disappointed environmentally-minded GOP donors are with this year's crop of candidates.
Really?
Really?? What did they think was going to happen?
Republican donor Andy Sabin had a great seat on the floor for Thursdays GOP presidential debate and found himself increasingly impressed with the way Ted Cruz answered some questions. But overall, Sabin left frustrated with a lack of discussion of his pet topics: energy and climate change. Zero. None. Its a nonissue, Sabin said. Just another lonely night in the life of a green GOP donor.
Sabin, president of the New York-based refining company Sabin Metal Corporation, may seem like a paradox. Hes given to Karl Roves Crossroads USA PAC and the state Republican Party, but also last year gave $3.5 million to Columbia Universitys school of climate-change law. Hes vowed to try to get the party to fight climate change, even as many standard-bearers on the Right deny that it is happening.
Even though the party on the whole hasnt embraced any climate-change action, there are a handful of donors trying to get the GOP on board. North Carolina businessman Jay Fasion, for example, got plenty of press over the summer (including in National Journal), for announcing a $10 million 501(c)(4) political action group and a $165 million foundation called ClearPath to back Republican candidates who want to work on clean energy.
So far in the presidential race, that money hasnt made much of a dentand now donors are left figuring out whats next.
EDIT
http://www.nationaljournal.com/s/355926/environmentalist-gop-donors-are-losing-hope
geomon666
(7,512 posts)Voting (and in the above case, donating) against your own best interests and against the best interests of every living creature on the planet. If you're that environmentally conscious, why in the every loving fuck of it all would you ever vote or donate to a republican? Especially these days.
It makes no sense.
tavernier
(12,392 posts)didn't she, each dumber than the next.
No wonder she didn't want Jeb! to run.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)I just shook my head.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)vacation homes not so much, they're fully insured.
hunter
(38,316 posts)... disposable people. Government subsidies for the most affluent, armed response against everyone else.
Remember George W. Bush and hurricane Katrina?
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)'homeless people' refugees were all over Houston, stuck in their cars, out of gas, no money, no help. lots of them kids, elderly people, pets it was was hot for days. electric was out here for about 3 weeks but it could have been so much worse for my family.
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)The free market cares about the environment exactly 0%. Exxon started to raise the alarm about global warming in the 1970s, but buried its own research because it realized it would rather make money right up until disaster struck.
The free market did nothing about smog until the government intervened.
Nothing about the ozone layer until government intervened.
Child labor. Egret feathers. Seatbelts and airbags. Slavery.
The free market takes action to put ethics, human health, the environment, or long-term thinking of any kind ahead of immediate profits approximately NEVER.