General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhen will the lower middle class ( especially white men) realize that the rich play them?
They play them like a Stradivarius. Using the 4 strings of prejudice, hate, ignorance and fear to get them to dance to do their bidding. They do not not care 1 iota for these peoples lives, yet they line up like sheep to vote for the right. I am always amazed that ANYONE would vote based on what they hear of radio/T.V. and not what they see happening with their own two eyes.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)when we ban football. Until then the barbarism continues. Ring out yer dead!
valerief
(53,235 posts)that protects the oligarchy.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)but very few agree with me.
I love to find anti-football people, and now it's coming to light that head injuries destroy lives, finally!
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)who play football have been protecting their testicles for 100 years (with cups). Their brains, on the other hand?
Not sure what Darwin or Mendel would make of that
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)$ and scholarship for possible injury and shortened life span. Darwin wouldn't find it surprising at all but Marx would have more to say.
byeya
(2,842 posts)Gave up on baseball with the use of steroids.
Better off without the pro sports.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)but it looks like all sports extract a price. Badminton anyone?
RZM
(8,556 posts)In many places soccer is much more popular than any single sport is here. So it's pretty tough to argue that the problems you talk about are the fault of sports.
valerief
(53,235 posts)RZM
(8,556 posts)Since apparently that would free them from the shackles of enjoying balls being kicked and thrown around.
Maybe the explanation is a whole lot simpler. Perhaps . . . people just like sports. It's part of being human. Not everybody likes them, but a lot of people do.
Yes, governments have always tried to gain advantages from sports. But they didn't invent them, nor did they invent their appeal. Competitive activities can be lots of fun.
Kennah
(14,276 posts)Mass
(27,315 posts)Right now, they are lumped with people earning $200K+ a year, who are also seen as the middle class. Sorry, but their needs are not the same.
rfranklin
(13,200 posts)but that all got confused when dueto the efforts of unions they got good middle class buying power in the 1960's. A factory worker could send his kids to college and have a few toys plus a pension to look forward to in retirement. They forgot or never knew how they got all those nice things. Then, as the one percenters began to take it all away, they fell for the "affirmative action" is taking your jobs bullshit hook line and sinker.
valerief
(53,235 posts)byeya
(2,842 posts)And of course, Middle Income should be dropped in favor of a secure living wage or something similar.
brewens
(13,596 posts)Of course the wealthy say they don't have all the money. "Take it all and it still won't make a dent." They believe that. As if we would actually suggest "taking it all" and having taxed them reasonably all along wouldn't have made a huge difference.
Everybody is paid out of the same pot. If you let crooks at the top rake in billions through fraud and game the system to take all the money out of corporations, you come up short almost everywhere else.
They understand it when they are told it's wrong to give poor people money for doing nothing. They believe it when they are told any more help you give poor people will be taken out of their wallets. They don't understand that all along the 1% have been doing exactly that to help themselves. Of course if you tax the wealthy, it means they will have to pay higher taxes on their powerball jackpot when they win it.
bongbong
(5,436 posts)The corporatocracy controls everything & 99% of media. Failures, misery, wars, etc will all be blamed on "socialism" & "evil libruls". Uneducated fools will continue to lap up the lies.
Repeat ad nauseum.
valerief
(53,235 posts)As long as crap like that gets tossed around, personal security is not even an option.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)So long as we liberals insist that they are not, the answer to the OP's question is never.
bigbrother05
(5,995 posts)Until it becomes clear that someone else maintaining a decent standard of living and wage, even if a public employee, is not the reason they are struggling.
If you have a decent job, you might bitch about taxes, but in your heart you appreciate decent schools, good roads, and safe neighborhoods.
When you are on the edge or over the cliff, it is easier for smooth talking liars (or flame throwing radio hosts) to redirect your concerns to their preferred targets instead of the true source of the problem.
Just as absolute power corrupts absolutely, uncontrolled capitalism seeks absolute control.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)Speck Tater
(10,618 posts)there is no cure for stupid.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)when they can no longer feed and protect their children.
That time is on its way.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)what no beer
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)Iggo
(47,558 posts)And exactly.
meow2u3
(24,764 posts)In other words, the rich use wedge issues to pick their already thin pockets.
demilib
(100 posts)It reminds me of a quote I once read: " A lie can travel around the world before the truth gets out of bed in the morning."
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)1. Husband's 90-year-old aunt:
Democrats are evil. They want to kill babies. The Republicans want to stop abortion.
2. Husband's brother-in-law:
If Obama wins again, there will be race riots. We've had enough of this shit of having a black guy in the White House.
3. My elderly aunt
Democrats only want to give everything to minorities who take their food stamp money and buy steaks. They keep having babies on my dime.
This is the mentality we're up against and it's fueled to a great extent by FAUX "News" and to some extent by the MSM that does damn little to counter it - even though they know it's all bullshit.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)husband's brother-in-law and then stick around to watch his reaction when he watches it (and then, of course, report back to DU on same), your resulting escapade will last down through the ages. That's a promise
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)Maybe those two should have a conversation and clobber each other with their bat shit crazy.
treestar
(82,383 posts)I'd like to ask him why it takes re-election for those race riots to start. Why didn't they occur at the initial election? Perhaps BIL can explain that one.
SoutherDem
(2,307 posts)Because many in my family says the same thing.
wwytchwood
(31 posts)never - the scots-irish heritage
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)Socialists the remaining 89%.
The longer I live, the more credence I give to P.T. Barnum's observation that "there's a sucker born every minute."
byeya
(2,842 posts)The only consolation I harbor is that there was a fundy awakening during the 20s and these same people, or most of them, because ardent New Dealers. Of course, equal protection under the law wasn't an issue then so maybe I shouldn't feel consoled.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)the working class to rally around.
Today (after 30 years of Reagan-Bushism and 60-odd years of Red-bashing\baiting)??
See post #16 upthread for attitudes common among today's working class. (#2 opinion is my fav.)
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)The rich and entitled have always had a keen eye on their wallet and the ballot box. ALWAYS.
Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Who were the white men who created this country unwittingly serving?
Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)Capt.Rocky300
(1,005 posts)great Harry S. Truman quote, How many times do you have to get hit over the head until you figure out whos hitting you.
― Harry S. Truman
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)in his birthplace (Lamar, MO) and college in his youthful stomping grounds (Kansas City\Independence).
My favorite quote: "I don't give the Republicans hell. I just tell the truth and they think it's hell!" Never grows old.
onlyadream
(2,166 posts)You can't fix stupid.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)they would make more of an effort to represent the populace as a whole in an FDR style instead of triangulating, discouraging at least some FDR-type Democrats, and sharing votes with Republicans.
The way to win more votes for the left is to take action consistent with liberal and progressive values instead of taking the left for granted and giving excuses.
The "the lower middle class ( especially white men)" do not want to see another wage-lowering "free-trade" agreement, no matter what the excuse. They don't want to see another extension of the Bush tax cuts. They don't want to see another bail out for the super-rich. They don't want to see de facto immunity given to the banksters and openly admitted war criminals. They don't want to see endless wars, on credit with no participation of the super-rich except to collect more wealth.
The open failure to take action consistent with liberal and progressive values instead of taking the left for granted gives the propagandists at Faux News and elsewhere encouragement to continue with their propaganda and hate talk. Such propaganda and hate talk attracts some, but not all, of those in "the lower middle class ( especially white men)."
If this Administration would aggressively target and prosecute criminals whose policies are supported by the propagandists at Faux News and elsewhere, such as those who engaged in torture and other war crimes, it would take away support for Faux News and the other propagandists in the MSM.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)In fact, lower-class white men are more likely to vote dem than middle-class white men or upper-class white men, all else being equal. Not that it's done them any good for the last 40 years.
leftstreet
(36,109 posts)SoutherDem
(2,307 posts)Not until we separate the church and state.
Not until we educate the "lower middle class" to realize the 1% don't give a care for them.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)So long as we liberals continue to use the phrase "white male" as a pejorative, it's unlikely to change.
This thread is an excellent example of the kind of condescension that the normal person would find repellent.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2008/05/obama_and_orwell.html
The perennial struggle of Democratic contenders to appeal to ordinary Americans seems very much of a piece with Orwell's sharp descriptions. Election after election, Democrats argue that once Joe and Jane Sixpack fully grasp the wisdom of the latest six-point college-loan program, or of an 800-page health-care scheme, they will come to wave the Democratic banner. And, sometimes, these voters do just thatprovided that the candidate in question has demonstrated a sense that he or she is not treating them as the subject of an anthropological study. Bill Clinton had a full steamer trunk of domestic programs; he also was a product of Georgetown, Oxford, and Yale Law School. But his 18 years in the vineyards of Arkansas politics gave him the tools to compete for support on a more visceral level. Then there were Clinton's obvious tastes for earthly pleasuresfrom Big Macs to more intimate diversionswhich made it very hard to label him as an aloof elitist.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)so working class does not mean one has to be in the right wing tribe
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)I'm a liberal even though it means I have to associate with people who think that by virtue of my race/gender/profession, I'm probably an ignorant gun-toting drunken zealot for whom bowling and watching football is the limit of my cognitive capacity.
To them, It's incumbent on me to prove otherwise, and like most people, most white guys aren't adequately fact-driven to feel sufficient motivation to do so.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)As in social class, is real. They don't
Also when Horatio Alger stops being part of the myth.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)Fresh_Start
(11,330 posts)nt
Iggo
(47,558 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)Poor white soldiers, who believed they were fighting a common cause with the Confederacy, were put in front of the cannons first. They thought they had a common cause with the rich plantation owners, but the rich plantation owners considered them expendable. It seems like nothing has changed in the thinking.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)from. Forget the football we can always get rid of the electrical power. Oh there are some who are lower middle class that doesn't buy the bullshit.
Stargleamer
(1,989 posts)"The answer, my friend, is blowing in the wind, the answer is blowing in the wind"
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)you say "THEY don't care one iota for these peoples' lives"
but many of the replies here show that WE do not care one iota for these people. We have an unhealthy supply of contempt for them. Given that fairly obvious fact which is all to easily observed, doesn't it become a hard sell to convince these people we sneer at that WE care one iota for their lives?
Metaphorical death of a sales pitch.
Salesman rings the doorbell. Woman answers, salesman begins his pitch.
"Excuse me, ma'am, I can see you are a blithering idiot, probably too stupid to buy the fantastic product I am selling ..."
SpartanDem
(4,533 posts)and then wondering why we don't vote for them.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)RZM
(8,556 posts)Step one is not calling them stupid, racist, assholes. They will not listen to people who double-down on the condescension right out of the gate.
The right wing establishment may be playing a shell game with them, but at least they have the sense to not make fun of them while doing so.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)Among whites without a college degree, income has become a stronger predictor of the vote over time. But actually its those with less income, not more income, who are more likely to support Democratic presidential candidates. And again, there certainly no trend by which whites with below-average incomes and no college degree become more Republican.
http://electiondissection.blogspot.com/2012/02/some-more-data-on-voting-of-lower.html
The richer you are, the more likely you are to vote Republican. Middle-class whites more likely to vote Republican than lower-class ones.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)by the earth.
Seriously, the one unifying factor among nearly all Americans is their obsession with anything that comes out of that stupid box. They believe anything it tells them, they buy anything it sells, and will even compromise their personal beliefs and change their lives to conform with whatever it tells them is "cool, sexy, what-the-smart-people-are-doing, will make you better than you are, etc.", not matter how bizarre or contradictory to reality.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)Oh, they will be both white hot furious and crestfallen all at once but only after all the effective ladders have been pulled up will they see and anyone focused on a path to prevent such that depends on them seeing quicker is fooling themselves and everyone else as well.
As usual through history they will have to be run over or run around and allowed to resentfully and dishonestly play catch up after history has passed them by and even then a significant minority will ever work to restore the old order. What we deal with now are the sprouts of the last round of old seeds. None of this is new, just kinda new seeming to a brief frame of reference.
They won't be convinced or placated, they almost never are. Any examples are sparse even given a free hand to scour 10,000 years or so. They aren't going to sweep themselves into the dustbin of history nor will they be cajoled there. Sweeping is not a passive action, the dust gets a beating and thoroughly disrupted.
We are dead as fried chicken if we wait for these sleepers to awaken or dare fool our selves that everyone is convincible. Too damn many will consistently and willfully support the interests and whims of the ruling class, it is their nature. They crave such authority, it is their view of the natural order and I suspect can only be curbed over thousands of years that include major stress points that really shape the course of human events but even then it would not be eliminated because it is carried in the genes more than likely, a vestigial thing from ages gone past.
whistler162
(11,155 posts)Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)The AMT came along in the late 60's because people were fed up with the rich not paying taxes.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)not before.
alittlelark
(18,890 posts)Likely - never. They are deeply fearful . They see ppl that LOOK like them telling them that their blue collar fears are due to browns, blacks and the over-educated elite.....
They see 'the other side' populated with browns, blacks, WOMEN, LGBT .... Their fearful mind will not accept 'message'. They are too deep into FEAR.
I do feel sorry for them. When we had union strength we were able to help them assuage their fear enough to be able to THINK.
The Union busting that started in the '80's is bearing ugly fearful fruit.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)I have a die-hard Glenn Beck fan for a neighbor. He spouts the talking points so well. How the
rich are paying too many taxes and how the Bush tax cuts need to be extended. How Social
Security and other social programs are a waste of money--and how the banks need to be regulated
LESS.
All of the talking points--filtered down from the Koch Brothers, the elites, the millionaires and the billionaires--into
the mouths of the right-wing-talk-radio blowhards. People like my neighbor listen intently to the anger,
hyperbole, fear and general hysteria spewed daily on Beck, Fox and the rest of the right-wing shows. He thinks
he's a man-in-the-know--a real connoisseur of knowledge. Beck has him convinced that he has the "real scoop"
and that he's privy to the ultimate truth that the liberal media won't tell him.
Truth is--if you break it down--what my neighbor leverages is the welfare and continued power of millionaires,
billionaires, corporations and other mucky mucks who have destroyed our democracy and turned out government
into a bought-and-paid-for joke. Meanwhile, Mr. Neighbor rails against Obama and gives Republicans a free
pass at every turn. Meanwhile, these elites that my neighbor aids--are the ones who have decimated it all--by
purchasing the majority of our politicians in BOTH parties.
It's just pathetic how these middle-class white guys are used. I used to feel sorry for them. I don't anymore.
I have pity on how stupid and gullible they are. Furthermore, Beck has them convinced that they are the smartest
and most informed guys in the room--and that anyone who doesn't like Beck--is an idiot. So, intelligent and
rational conversation with these guys is utterly useless. The hubris of these people is intolerable. They are menaces
who are so blind to the fact that they are being used like cheap whores to toe the line for greedy power mongers who
laugh their assess off at people like my neighbor.
Seriously, the shit will really hit the fan when people like my neighbor realize what we all ready know--that both
parties have been commandeered by Fascists who hate democracy and "We The People". My neighbor points
the finger at Obama, but he's so blind and he's so brainwashed by Beck--that he doesn't see that it's the entire
system.
I actually think that Obama was and is a good guy. However, what has metastasized in our democracy--is bigger
and more powerful than the Presidency.
When these guys realize that they're had--I'd say that there will be a collective psychic meltdown in all of them, because
they've been the ones the most used and the most bamboozled. Beck practically has their egos tied up in all
of his lies being true. If it's not true, then they are the world's biggest idiotic sheep. And they are. They just
don't know it yet.
There will be hell to pay when these fools realize what's been going on.
0rganism
(23,957 posts)"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!"