General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI have one good thing to say about the Daily Mail.
They have great photos. Shit rag, but their photos are pretty much the best on the web. Case in point, the East coast storm.
CurtEastPoint
(18,652 posts)SamKnause
(13,108 posts)The photos are great.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)They must have a pretty strong US photography team.
frizzled
(509 posts)nt
MowCowWhoHow III
(2,103 posts)Strips away the text apart from photo captions and headline for context.
CommonSenseDemocrat
(377 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)I'm not sure what you are talking about. Maybe I just don't click on those articles.
CommonSenseDemocrat
(377 posts)Denzil_DC
(7,246 posts)But you can skip around all that if you try real hard.
Or there's the oh-so-well-illustrated spreads of whichever celebs of the day just happen to be pictured sunning themselves on a beach accompanied by cut-and-paste yada yada detailed commentary on their sex lives, curves, or lack of them, drooling over the skimpiness or voluminousness of their swimsuit, or the fact they've put on weight and let themselves go, how dare they, how could they not ...? But the pictures!
Or the latest scaremongering rightwing crap about asylum seekers, with just a smidgeon of fact mixed in, like all the best propagandists, or hatchet jobs on whatever the latest societal outgroup the Mail decides to pick on and incite its rabid commenters to pillory may be. Never a dull moment. But the pictures!
Or just about anything political that most of this forum rails vociferously, bitterly, and often at extreme length against on any given day. But the pictures!
But nice pics. Yeah, they've got that nailed. Let's link to them daily, mention them in passing so others link to them, reward them for their stances and send them ad revenue from a political board that used to think itself "underground," as long as they feed us just enough red meat by pandering to our prejudices, and we can look down our noses and call them a "rag" in an effort to inoculate ourselves while expressing approval, as if we're any better than those rabid commenters when it comes down to it. And then there's the pictures. We'll always have the pictures.
840high
(17,196 posts)mr blur
(7,753 posts)Started going downhill in the 1930s, when Rothermere, friend of Hitler and Mussolini, urged his readers to support the Blackshirts. Hasn't changed substantially since then.
I thought that DU was not in favour of linking to vile right-wing sources?
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)They always have pretty high res images. Only reason I go there. Their layout is good too.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)but he wants to be a paperback writer.
malaise
(269,093 posts)Give them that
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)Brickbat
(19,339 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)(or so I've been told)
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)Lately they've been playing more to the USA or I might get a USA version?
Anyway, I like to check out their sensationalist headlines and see what's up across the pond. The comments are brutal but sometimes insightful.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)I have to admit, I find it somewhat entertaining at times...
closeupready
(29,503 posts)they do some things well, in a technical sense. Sad how that works.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)at times. Hard to beat for photos though.