General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI am, for the first time, reading Zinn's-The People's History of the United States-
I would like to think that I "knew" this stuff before-but it is illuminated anew by his clear-headed and sensible prose.
I disregard moral relativism in general--it is clear that many of the time found slavery, etc to be wrong. I also know that people tend to give up their own moral feelings to those of the crowd. I know that I would likely not be a John Brown of the time, being a timid sort.
It is difficult to reconcile their beliefs with their deeds. It is truly, truly, hard to think that they thought they were not doing a great wrong when they said themselves that they were. When some freed their slaves posthumously. They knew-I know they did.
Oh-and the captains of industry--I wish there was a sufficient hell for these fuckers to burn in. But, alas--
KoKo
(84,711 posts)he had to say.
It has enlightened many minds and caused a backlash of vitriol in other minds.
It will be interesting to see what "new, first time reader" thinks about what Zinn had to say in his book.
digonswine
(1,485 posts)OffWithTheirHeads
(10,337 posts)but I have never read it. I'm going to put in a request at the library and give it a spin just based on your post.
digonswine
(1,485 posts)it is not a book for rolling through-leave it and come back to it.
OffWithTheirHeads
(10,337 posts)enough
(13,259 posts)A good historian can bring it into clarity and depth that wasn't there in what you thought you knew. I have this book on my wish list to read on audible books. Your post is reminding me to move it to the top of the list.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)DearAbby
(12,461 posts)They didn't teach that in history class eh?